Article Analysis
|
Points: 240 |
Assignment 1: Article Analysis |
||||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable (Below 60% F) |
Meets Minimum Expectations (60-69% D) |
Fair (70-79% C) |
Proficient (80-89% B) |
Exemplary (90-100% A) |
|
1. Provide a brief overview / synopsis of the issue. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely provided a brief overview / synopsis of the issue. |
Insufficiently provided a brief overview / synopsis of the issue. |
Partially provided a brief overview / synopsis of the issue. |
Satisfactorily provided a brief overview / synopsis of the issue. |
Thoroughly provided a brief overview / synopsis of the issue. |
|
2. Discuss the model or economic theory that relates to the issue presented in the news article. Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely discussed the model or economic theory that relates to the issue presented in the news article. |
Insufficiently discussed the model or economic theory that relates to the issue presented in the news article. |
Partially discussed the model or economic theory that relates to the issue presented in the news article. |
Satisfactorily discussed the model or economic theory that relates to the issue presented in the news article. |
Thoroughly discussed the model or economic theory that relates to the issue presented in the news article. |
|
3. Discuss what economic theory states and predicts about the issue presented in the news article. Weight: 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely discussed what economic theory states and predicts about the issue presented in the news article. |
Insufficiently discussed what economic theory states and predicts about the issue presented in the news article. |
Partially discussed what economic theory states and predicts about the issue presented in the news article. |
Satisfactorily discussed what economic theory states and predicts about the issue presented in the news article. |
Thoroughly discussed what economic theory states and predicts about the issue presented in the news article. |
|
4. Assess how the situation / issue presented in the news article aligns with economic theory. Weight: 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely assessed how the situation / issue presented in the news article aligns with economic theory. |
Insufficiently assessed how the situation / issue presented in the news article aligns with economic theory. |
Partially assessed how the situation / issue presented in the news article aligns with economic theory. |
Satisfactorily assessed how the situation / issue presented in the news article aligns with economic theory. |
Thoroughly assessed how the situation / issue presented in the news article aligns with economic theory. |
|
5. 2 references Weight: 5% |
No references provided |
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
|
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% |
More than 8 errors present |
7-8 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |