Teacher Leader Analysis Paper Rubric
|
Criteria |
Emerging |
Meets |
Exceeds |
|
Issue, Challenge, or Problem to be Addressed |
Issue, challenge, or problem was minimally identified
|
Issue, challenge, or problem was identified
|
Issue, challenge, or problem was clearly identified
|
|
Evaluate the issue |
Evaluated the challenge vaguely in relation to five primary areas: Background, Need, Constraints, Resources Available, and Resources Needed |
Evaluated the challenge objectively and thoroughly in relation to five primary areas: Background, Need, Constraints, Resources Available, and Resources Needed |
Evaluated the challenge more objectively and thoroughly in relation to five primary areas: Background, Need, Constraints, Resources Available, and Resources Needed |
|
Mission Statement |
A concise description of the purpose for creating an action plan to address the problem and how it will be addressed was minimally articulated |
A concise description of the purpose for creating an action plan to address the problem and how it will be addressed was articulated |
A concise description of the purpose for creating an action plan to address the problem and how it will be addressed was clearly articulated |
|
Goals |
Goals minimally identified by: S specific M measurable A achievable R realistic T time-bound |
Goals identified by: S specific M measurable A achievable R realistic T time-bound |
Goals identified were clearly by: S specific M measurable A achievable R realistic T time-bound |
|
Action Steps |
Action steps were minimally developed with little specification provided for: · Who will be responsible for coordinating or carrying out the action? · A time by which that action might occur. · The intended outcome of the action |
Action steps were developed including specification provided for: · Who will be responsible for coordinating or carrying out the action? · A time by which that action might occur. · The intended outcome of the action |
Action steps were clearly developed including defined specification provided for: · Who will be responsible for coordinating or carrying out the action? · A time by which that action might occur. · The intended outcome of the action |
When it comes to evaluation of issues, the teacher would gauge on whether the student vaguely touched on primary areas of the issue in question. One would have evaluated the issue to standards if their response comprehensively tackled all segments of the issue in question. Thirdly the issue would have been intensively dealt with beyond what was expected.
The writing of the mission statement should not just be obscurely articulated without recommendations of implementing the mission. One would be deemed to have fairly examined the mission statement if they gave an in-depth description of the purpose of having an action plan and outlined steps to be taken in order to achieve the expected action. One would have gone beyond fair articulation of the action plan, if they adduced the plan critically with a precise order of duties and obligations of parties to the action plan and gave expected estimates of achievement.
Every action plan has a goal to meet. Goals are to be identified through the Specific Measurable Achievable Realistic Time-bound. This means that the goals are to be achievable and realistic on a critically emphasized and researched manner. The benchmark for this goal determining should not be mere identification of the goal but should be clear and concise.
In conclusion, Action steps should be specific enough to deduce what every party to the action plan would be obligated to do. Sheer statement of statement would be undermining the objective of the action plan.