Teacher Leader Analysis Paper Rubric

profileSola.89
analysis_of_a_teacher_1.docx

Criteria

Emerging

Meets

Exceeds

Issue, Challenge, or

Problem to be Addressed

Issue, challenge, or problem was minimally identified

Issue, challenge, or problem was identified

Issue, challenge, or problem was clearly identified

Evaluate the issue

Evaluated the challenge vaguely in relation to five primary areas: Background, Need, Constraints, Resources

Available, and Resources Needed

Evaluated the challenge objectively and thoroughly in

relation to five primary areas: Background, Need, Constraints, Resources

Available, and Resources Needed

Evaluated the challenge more objectively and thoroughly in

relation to five primary areas: Background, Need, Constraints, Resources

Available, and Resources Needed

Mission Statement

A concise description of the purpose for creating an action plan to address the problem and how it will be addressed was minimally articulated

A concise description of the purpose for creating an action plan to address the problem and how it will be addressed was articulated

A concise description of the purpose for creating an action plan to address the problem and how it will be addressed was clearly articulated

Goals

Goals minimally identified by:

S specific

M measurable

A achievable

R realistic

T time-bound

Goals identified by:

S specific

M measurable

A achievable

R realistic

T time-bound

Goals identified were clearly by:

S specific

M measurable

A achievable

R realistic

T time-bound

Action Steps

Action steps were minimally developed with little specification provided for:

· Who will be responsible for coordinating or carrying out the action?

· A time by which that action might occur.

· The intended outcome of the action

Action steps were developed including specification provided for:

· Who will be responsible for coordinating or carrying out the action?

· A time by which that action might occur.

· The intended outcome of the action

Action steps were clearly developed including defined specification provided for:

· Who will be responsible for coordinating or carrying out the action?

· A time by which that action might occur.

· The intended outcome of the action

It is every teachers responsibility to evaluation every action, problem question fairly. Where a teacher has presented an Issue, Challenge, or Problem to be addressed by students it is expected that they have an evaluation threshold. The teacher is expected to evaluate every response independently and merge every answer on the levels. The first being whether the issue was partially addressed, the second being whether the problem was adequately addressed and whether the challenge was completely solved and exceeded expectations.

When it comes to evaluation of issues, the teacher would gauge on whether the student vaguely touched on primary areas of the issue in question. One would have evaluated the issue to standards if their response comprehensively tackled all segments of the issue in question. Thirdly the issue would have been intensively dealt with beyond what was expected.

The writing of the mission statement should not just be obscurely articulated without recommendations of implementing the mission. One would be deemed to have fairly examined the mission statement if they gave an in-depth description of the purpose of having an action plan and outlined steps to be taken in order to achieve the expected action. One would have gone beyond fair articulation of the action plan, if they adduced the plan critically with a precise order of duties and obligations of parties to the action plan and gave expected estimates of achievement.

Every action plan has a goal to meet. Goals are to be identified through the Specific Measurable Achievable Realistic Time-bound. This means that the goals are to be achievable and realistic on a critically emphasized and researched manner. The benchmark for this goal determining should not be mere identification of the goal but should be clear and concise.

In conclusion, Action steps should be specific enough to deduce what every party to the action plan would be obligated to do. Sheer statement of statement would be undermining the objective of the action plan.