CAPM of Pepsi Co.
ASSURANCE OF LEARNING EXERCISE 3D: DEVELOPING A COMPETITIVE PROFILE MATRIX FOR MCDONALD’S CORPORATION
PURPOSE:
Monitoring competitors’ performance and strategies is a key aspect of an external audit. This exercise is designed to give you practice evaluating the competitive position of organizations in a given industry and assimilating that information in the form of a Competitive Profile Matrix.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Gather information from Assurance of Learning Exercise 1A. Also, turn back to the Cohesion Case and review the section on competitors (pages 33-35).
2. On a separate sheet of paper, prepare a Competitive Profile Matrix that includes McDonald’s, Burger King Holdings, and Yum! Brands, Inc.
3. Turn in your Competitive Profile Matrix for a class work grade.
TEACHING NOTES:
Answers to this question will vary depending on the factors chosen and the competitors analyzed.
The following is what a typical answer might look like.
· List critical success factors identified in the internal and external analysis.
· Assign to each factor a weight from .0 (not important) to 1.0 (very important). These weights show the relative importance. The total of all the weights should equal 1.0.
· Assign a 1-4 rating to each factor to describe the factor: 1= major weakness, 2 = minor weakness, 3 = minor strength, and 4 = major strength.
· Multiply each factor’s weight by its rating to get a weighted score.
· Sum the weighted scores for each variable to determine the total weighted score for the organization.
· Do the same for one or more competing organizations using the same critical success factors and weights.
|
|
|
McDonald's |
YUM! Brands |
Burger King |
|||
|
Critical Success Factors |
Weight |
Rating |
Score |
Rating |
Score |
Rating |
Score |
|
Global Presence |
0.13 |
4 |
0.52 |
3 |
0.39 |
2 |
0.26 |
|
Market Share |
0.07 |
4 |
0.28 |
3 |
0.21 |
3 |
0.14 |
|
Product Quality |
0.09 |
3 |
0.27 |
2 |
0.18 |
4 |
0.36 |
|
Customer Satisfaction |
0.08 |
2 |
0.16 |
3 |
0.24 |
4 |
0.32 |
|
Financial Stability |
0.14 |
4 |
0.56 |
2 |
0.28 |
3 |
0.42 |
|
Technology |
0.08 |
4 |
0.32 |
3 |
0.24 |
3 |
0.16 |
|
Product Development |
0.05 |
4 |
0.20 |
3 |
0.15 |
2 |
0.10 |
|
Brand Awareness |
0.16 |
4 |
0.64 |
3 |
0.48 |
3 |
0.32 |
|
Price Competitiveness |
0.13 |
4 |
0.52 |
3 |
0.39 |
3 |
0.26 |
|
Diversification |
0.07 |
3 |
0.21 |
4 |
0.28 |
3 |
0.14 |
|
TOTALS: |
1.00 |
|
3.68 |
|
2.84 |
|
2.48 |
Source: Dale Wiersema. 2009. McDonald’s Corporation Strategic Management Plan.