PAPER

MGT425

Critical Thinking Rubric - Module 3

Criteria Meets Expectation Approaches Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence

Content, Research, and Analysis

25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points

Requirements Includes all of the

required components, as

specified in the

assignment.

Includes most of the

required components, as

specified in the

assignment.

Includes some of the

required components, as

specified in the

assignment.

Includes few of the

required components,

as specified in the

assignment.

25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points

Content Demonstrates strong or

adequate knowledge of

the materials; correctly

represents knowledge

from the readings and

sources regarding

implementation of

leadership theories,

building effective teams,

and addressing

challenges associated

with team cohesion.

Some significant but not

major errors or omissions

in demonstration of

knowledge regarding

implementation of

leadership theories,

building effective teams,

and addressing challenges

associated with team

cohesion.

Major errors or

omissions in

demonstration of

knowledge regarding

implementation of

leadership theories,

building effective teams,

and addressing

challenges associated

with team cohesion.

Fails to demonstrate

knowledge of the

materials regarding

implementation of

leadership theories,

building effective

teams, and addressing

challenges associated

with team cohesion.

25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points

Analysis Provides strong or

adequate thought,

insight and analysis of

concepts and

applications of leadership

theories and teamwork.

Some significant but not

major errors or omissions

in thought, insight and

analysis of concepts and

applications of leadership

theories and teamwork.

Major errors or

omissions in thought,

insight and analysis of

concepts and

applications of

leadership theories and

teamwork.

Fails to demonstrate

thought, insight and

analysis of concepts and

applications of

leadership theories and

teamwork.

Mechanics and Writing

17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points

Demonstrates

college-level

proficiency in

organization,

grammar and

style.

Project is clearly

organized, well written,

and in proper format as

outlined in the

assignment. Strong

sentence and paragraph

structure; few errors in

grammar and spelling.

Project is fairly well

organized and written,

and is in proper format as

outlined in the

assignment. Reasonably

good sentence and

paragraph structure;

significant number of

errors in grammar and

spelling.

Project is poorly

organized; does not

follow proper paper

format. Inconsistent to

inadequate sentence

and paragraph

development; numerous

errors in grammar and

spelling.

Project is not organized

or well written, and is

not in proper paper

format. Poor quality

work; unacceptable in

terms of grammar and

spelling.

17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points

Demonstrates

proper use of

APA style

Project contains proper

APA formatting,

according to the CSU-

Global Guide to Writing

and APA Requirements,

with no more than one

significant error.

Few errors in APA

formatting, according to

the CSU-Global Guide to

Writing and APA

Requirements, with no

more than two to three

significant errors.

Significant errors in APA

formatting, according to

the CSU-Global Guide to

Writing and APA

Requirements, with four

to five significant errors.

Numerous errors in APA

formatting, according to

the CSU-Global Guide to

Writing and APA

Requirements, with

more than five

significant errors.

Total points possible = 130