Strategic Management ( 6 questions)
|
Category |
5 Excellent |
3 Adequate |
1 Poor |
|
1. -Writing Process Organization/ Clarity |
*Writing engages reader and enhances his/her understanding of the topic. *Vocabulary & sentence structure are sophisticated and appropriate for the discipline *Writing clearly demonstrates an effective pattern of organizing that facilitates the reader’s understanding. *Papers have an effective beginning, sophisticated development, and thoughtful conclusion. *Demonstrates use of a carefully executed writing process. |
* Writing enables reader to understand ideas with little or no re-reading. * Vocabulary and sentence structure are adequate, especially for discipline, but may lack sophistication. * Writing follows an appropriate pattern of organization. * Incomplete execution of writing process. |
* Writing requires reader to frequently re-read in order to understand ideas or writing is so confusing that reader fails completely to understand ideas. * Simplistic word choice limits description and/ or expression * Redundancies distract and confuse reader. * Writing’s overall structure lacks coherence and organization. * No apparent writing process used. |
|
2. Explanation/ Evidence |
* Main points clearly stated and well advanced. * Statements substantially supported with compelling evidence. * Effectively addresses audience. |
* Main points adequately stated. * Statements sufficiently supported with relevant evidence. * Partially addresses audience. |
* Main points not clearly stated. * Statements insufficiently supported or supported with irrelevant evidence. * Misses audience. |
|
3. Critical Thinking |
* Insightful, well-articulated analysis, synthesis, and critique of the subject * Sustains a well-focused analysis, connecting ideas in a sophisticated and logical manner. * Thoughtfully considers multiple viewpoints / positions where appropriate. |
* Cogent, clear analysis, synthesis, and critique of the subject. * Connects ideas logically. * Identifies multiple viewpoints where appropriate. |
* Superficial and/or poorly articulated analysis of subject. * Fails to connect ideas logically. * Ignores or superficially evaluates multiple viewpoints. |
|
4. Research Techniques |
* Uses appropriate materials from a variety of resources to support ideas. * Consistently employs a standard documentation style. |
* Adequately uses appropriate materials from a variety of resources to support ideas. * Employs a standard documentation style with few errors. |
* Fails to select and synthesize appropriate resources. * Makes significant errors in documentation style. |
|
5. Mechanics / Usage |
* Sophisticated use of grammatical conventions * Writing is virtually free from the kinds of errors that distract from meaning and readability |
* Grammatical structures are generally appropriate, although not necessarily perfect. * Occasional errors may distract from meaning and readability. |
* Grammatical errors are so obvious that they seriously distract readers. |
Guidelines for Writing Examinations and Final Project Papers
Developed by Joseph A. Huggins
Examination questions should be at least one and a half pages in length each.
Final project paper should be at least ten pages in length.
See syllabus also for writing guidelines