Strategic Management ( 6 questions)

profileodehe
guidelines_for_exam__papers.doc

Category

5 Excellent

3 Adequate

1 Poor

1. -Writing Process

Organization/ Clarity

*Writing engages reader and enhances his/her understanding of the topic.

*Vocabulary & sentence structure are

sophisticated and appropriate for the

discipline

*Writing clearly demonstrates an effective

pattern of organizing that facilitates the

reader’s understanding.

*Papers have an effective beginning,

sophisticated development, and thoughtful

conclusion.

*Demonstrates use of a carefully executed

writing process.

* Writing enables reader to understand ideas with little or no re-reading.

* Vocabulary and sentence structure are adequate, especially for discipline, but may lack sophistication.

* Writing follows an appropriate pattern of organization.

* Incomplete execution of writing process.

* Writing requires reader to frequently re-read in order to understand ideas or writing is so confusing that reader fails completely to understand ideas.

* Simplistic word choice limits description and/ or expression

* Redundancies distract and confuse reader.

* Writing’s overall structure lacks coherence and organization.

* No apparent writing process used.

2. Explanation/ Evidence

* Main points clearly stated and well

advanced.

* Statements substantially supported with compelling evidence.

* Effectively addresses audience.

* Main points adequately stated.

* Statements sufficiently supported with relevant evidence.

* Partially addresses audience.

* Main points not clearly stated.

* Statements insufficiently supported or supported with irrelevant evidence.

* Misses audience.

3. Critical Thinking

* Insightful, well-articulated analysis, synthesis, and critique of the subject

* Sustains a well-focused analysis, connecting ideas in a sophisticated and logical manner.

* Thoughtfully considers multiple viewpoints / positions where appropriate.

* Cogent, clear analysis, synthesis, and critique of the subject.

* Connects ideas logically.

* Identifies multiple viewpoints where appropriate.

* Superficial and/or poorly articulated analysis of subject.

* Fails to connect ideas logically.

* Ignores or superficially evaluates multiple viewpoints.

4. Research Techniques

* Uses appropriate materials from a variety of resources to support ideas.

* Consistently employs a standard documentation style.

* Adequately uses appropriate materials from a variety of resources to support ideas.

* Employs a standard documentation style with few errors.

* Fails to select and synthesize appropriate resources.

* Makes significant errors in documentation style.

5. Mechanics / Usage

* Sophisticated use of grammatical conventions

* Writing is virtually free from the kinds of errors that distract from meaning and readability

* Grammatical structures are generally appropriate, although not necessarily perfect.

* Occasional errors may distract from meaning and readability.

* Grammatical errors are so obvious

that they seriously distract readers.

Guidelines for Writing Examinations and Final Project Papers

Developed by Joseph A. Huggins

Examination questions should be at least one and a half pages in length each.

Final project paper should be at least ten pages in length.

See syllabus also for writing guidelines