FOR A-plus writer
Movie Review Rubric
|
|
|
10 |
8.5 |
7.5 |
5 |
|
|
Criteria 1 Engagement of the Reader 10 points
|
Hooks the readers and captures attention in a way that demands to be read. |
Generates interest early on and maintains it throughout. |
Presents in a lackluster manner, generates ambivalence in the reader. |
Fails to hook the reader and capture attention. |
|
|
Criteria 2 Organization 10 points |
Includes effective introduction, developed body, and satisfying conclusion; functions as a whole with a clear flow and purpose. |
Includes introduction, body, and conclusion; essay moves forward purposefully. |
It’s hard to tell where the beginning, middle, and end are; focus wanders. |
No clear beginning, middle, or end; lacks focus. |
|
|
Criteria 3 Grammar and Mechanics 10 points
|
Consistently free of errors with grammar and mechanics. |
Reasonably free of errors with grammar and mechanics. |
Lacks control of errors with grammar and mechanics. |
No control of errors with grammar and mechanics. |
|
|
Criteria 4 Summary 10 points |
Provides a brief summary of film without disclosing ending, includes enough information to satisfy reader. |
Provides a summary that is either a little too long or not long enough but does not give away ending, is not quite as compelling. |
Provides a summary either much too short or much too long, may be vague or tell too much. |
Provides little or no significant summary. |
|
|
Criteria 5 Opinion/Critique 20 points |
Opinion of the film is clearly articulated and is supported throughout review. |
Opinion of the film is somewhat clear and is supported throughout most of review. |
Opinion of the film is unclear or vague with little support throughout the review. |
Opinion is missing/no support in the review. |
|
|
Criteria 6 Supporting Details 20 points
Criteria 7 Incorporation of secondary source 20 points |
Substantial details from the movie strongly support opinion. Quotations, scenes, and characters are specifically referenced.
Outside source is integrated carefully and consciously into the essay, connecting clearly to the writer’s own ideas. All in-text and Works Cited formatting is correct. |
Details from the movie support opinion. Some quotations, scenes, and characters are specifically referenced.
Outside source is smoothly incorporated into the essay with small errors in formatting within essay or on Works Cited page |
Few details from the movie and little evidence support opinion. Rare references are made to quotations, scenes, and characters.
Outside source is indicated in the paper, but it does not connect well to the review/serious Errors in formatting. |
No details from the movie and little evidence offered to support opinion. Fails to reference quotations, scenes, or characters.
No outside source is incorporated into the text of the essay or there is no Works Cited page to indicate where reference originated
|
Total Points Earned:
Film Review
Draft due: Monday, April 27th/Tuesday, April 28th (complete draft)
Final due: Wednesday, April 29th/Thursday, April 30th (a minimum of two full pages, typed and double-spaced)
Please craft a well-crafted and well organized film review for the movie, Argo. What did you think of the movie? Remember, a review is the writers informed opinion about a subject, and what led you to have such feelings about it. When you are writing a film review, you must consider all of the components that make a movie either successful or unsuccessful. Think about the choices that the filmmakers made in order to get you to feel one way or another throughout the movie.
Although this review will be primarily your own thoughts on the movie, you must also incorporate one outside source into your paper. You may bring in historical information or compare/contrast another review with your own. You must document this additional source within the paper itself (in-text parenthetical citations) and on a Works Cited page.
Your final essay will be a minimum of two full pages, typed and double-spaced in Times New Roman font. This should be written in 5 paragraph essay format, with an introduction that includes a thesis, at least 3 body paragraphs and a conclusion.