Week 5 - Discussion 1
CHAPIER l3 L.eadershrP
high impact players, r:bange .xgents,,driuers and tuinners'-peoplet who
arZ ertremely ftixible, bright, tactical and strate;gic, wlto can handkz a lot
of information, make decisions qu:ick,ly, ,motiuate others, chase cr mouing
target and sbake things up. Preuiously, (.orporate recruitirtg emphasized
cridentials [scboolinSl] and experience, tubicb are still important, but ...
yrou can,t te'ach good-ti,eadership or bow tc be excited about life"2
Robert Greenleaf, fol:mer director of Managenrent Research at Al'&T and founding director of the (lenter for Applied Ethics, said,
.'The leacler exists to
serve thJse whom he nominally leads, those who supposedly follow him. He (or
,l.l ,"r... their fulfillmenr as his (or her) principal aim."3 The servant-leader ,"r.., p.opre and their u,ork seriously, listens to and takes the lead from the ;";pr: heals, is self-effaci.g, and sees lhimsel I or herself as a steward.4
LEADERSHIP TRAITS Early theories about leadership suggested thaLt excellent leaders possessed certain
o"i*, o, personal characteriiticq th,at lay at the root of their abilitv to lead' Following lworld war II, the U.S. Army surveyed soldiers in an attempt to coln-
pit. "
tiriof traits sharecl by commanders rvhom s'ldiers perceiverJ as lcaders. ?he.es,rlting list, which included 14 traits, was clearly irLadequate to describe
lcadership. No t*o commanders displeryed all the traits, and rnany famous commanders lacked sever:ll'
More recently, Gary Yukl constructed 'a list of traits and skills commonly
associated with efiective leaders.i Figure 13..[ preserrts these traits. Yukl's list sug-
gests that a leader is strongly motivated to e:<cel ancl succeed
l*$rffi
Dkcus:; teodfifip skilts, ond befuio
troiB,
rs
INffIS sr0u5
il {, :\" i.t
*.r re: :'
.I ,'
, Adaptable
Alert to social environment
Ambitious and achievement-oriented
Assertive
Cooperative
,, Decisive
Dependable
Dominant (desires to influence others)
. Energetic (high activitY level) Persistent
Self<onfident
Tolerant of slress
Willing to asume resPonsibilitY
futrce Leodership in Otgonizotions,: /0 by Cary Yukl {O l9u1
E&-rcation, Inc., Upper Saddle River, Nl9/458
Cleverness (intelligence)
Conceptual ability
Creativity
Diplomacy and tact
Fluency in speaking
Knowledge about the grouP thsk
Organizational (administrative) ability
Penuasiveness
Socialability
,' f,
? q
;!
{
t I {.
by Prentice-Hall, Inc. Adapted with perrnission of Pearson
Do meqgd women approach leadership differently? A study of 2Js
1r+t mal*td.*8-female) owners cf privatelyheld firms with six lo 325 employees in a mid-sized ltlorlh American city presented at thre
annual meeting of the Academy of f\4anagement (Seattle, August 3-6)
revealed no significant difference between male and female executitre
leadership. However, the owners describe gender as having an impor-
tant leadership role in management.
As the authors put it:
Mole ond fenale owners tend to use different-ond gender- stereotypic*rhetoric to de:;cribe their opprooches to business.
The fe,nole owners were siqnilicontly more likely thon the mole
ownerc to describe their alesired relotionship with employees
in stereotypicolly feminine tenns, reveoling the view thot orgo'
nizotitrnol leoders should be responsive to ond empower the
personol growth of their sL,bordinotes... The mole owners werc
signifir.ontly more likely thon the fenole owne$ to describe their
desired relotionshi p with ern plctyees i n stereotypically moscul i ne
terns, expressing the view,thttt orgonizotionol leoders should
commond and co'ttrol their subordinotes to ochieve meosuroble
results far the firn.
The authors, Jennifer E. Cliff of the University of Alberta, Nancy
Langon of the University of British Columbia, and Howard E. Aldridt
of the University of North Carolina note, "Rather than conforming pri-
marily to the masculine model of organizing, it appears that both male
and female owners manage their firms with a mix of masculine and
feminine approaches." Men and women manaSe similarly, but talk
about it differentlv.
$ Select an image that represents leadership, and then write a l0$ word essay explaining why you selected that image. Compare
your image to that of your classmates. Do men and women (in
your class) represent leadership differently?
Source: Academy of Management Media Release, "When lt Comes to Leader-
ship, Gender Difference:; are More a Matter of Talk than Action, Study Finds,'
November 6,2003.
No list of leadershrp traits and skills carr be definitive, however, because no two leaders are exactlJ/ alike. Different leaclers vvorking with different people in different siruations need different traits. tf people in charge possess what is needed vvhen it is needed, they should be abler to exercise effective leaclership.
William Feace, a former executive with Westinghouse and United Technol- ogies, is currently director and execr.rtive consultant with Doctus Management (lonsultancy of Clhester:, England. In the course of his career) Peace learned that certain traits servc him well in management jobs. ln a:n article for Haruard Busi' ness Reuiew, Peace noted the importance of :intelligence, energy, confidence, and responsibility. I-Iq cliffered from some observt:rs in his emphasis on candor, sensi- tivity, and a "cert:lin willingness to suffer the painful consequences of unpopular decisions." Peace called using these traits in nlanagement "soft management."6 As this chapter:'s !'aluing Diversity feature proints out, personal traits are often perceivecl as masculine or feminine.
Leadership Skills A person's skills ilre thr: competencies and caLpabilities he or she possesses. Look again at Figure 13.1, and notice that many of the skills Yukl identified are primar- ily usefuL in dr:aling with others. These skills include diplomacy, fluency in speech (communication skills), persuasiveness, and social r:bility. Some of the traits listed imply the exisrence of skills. Iror example, being decisive means that one has skill in making decisions by both rational and intuitive means.
Chris Carrey, formr:r president of Datatr:c Industries, which makes in-store computer systems, believes that subordinates should evaluate their bosses in what he callsreuerse performance ret,iews.l.[e had his 318 employees score their managers' skills in arcas such as coaching, listening, pr:aising, and responsiveness.
442
CHAPfER l3 L€:adersnlP
:mployees rated upper managei:s in terms of support of employees' articulation
,f go"ir, aftention to employee_ideas, and fairness. The survi:ys were i:Il1on)'mous'
rnd the results were shared. [;ormal, top-rJorarn appraisals followed within a
,""i[. "s.rreduling rhe reviewt; back-to-bac,k underscores the far:t thzit e!'(]ryone
:an perform better andeveryone has a chance t,c say how tLrat w:ill happen'"7
LeadershiP Behaviots
GaryYuklandhiscolleaguesdeterminedlgcategclrieso{..m.eanringhuiarrdmea. ,-hf.;f."dership U.n""uiot
t Figure 13.2 presents the Yukl group's catr:gorics
along with definitions "nd e*""tf its' As you examine these behaviors-ther things
leaders do in the .".r;;;;;rlrlir. or leadership-relate them ro the tr:rits and
skills discussed earliei. Then iirrk rhe conceprs to what you kno,rv about l'ruman
behavior and motivation as described in C'hapter 12'
TheGrstbehaviorYukllisted,p"tfotn.'"nt':emphasis'remaiLnsapopularfo- *, r* ."n"gers and business *.i,.rt. The movement in busines;s
today is; to pay
il;l; f", *"n", they learn arLd to reward them for their individual ancl group
performanc.. et f-vonatll Ptt''"ht-ical' "M'anagers and workers tacl'lie new
undertakings rn teams, whicfr ger bonuses if theii ideas f1y,"e Ily putting their
emphasis and money *her. th.i, words are, company nlanagers ernphasize per-
formance and ProductivitY'
MANAGEM ENr vEllru! EAD]EB9H ry- Management and leadership ;tre not synonyms'
Managert.pl.""t' organiire' staff'
lead, and conrrol. Thef -ight or might not br: efiective in influenci'g threir sub-
ordinates or team Inttt"tJ'" "t 'ni achieve go:rls' Ideally'.leadership and man-
.g.-.*-rr.ius combine to allow a manager to function as a leader, as Figure l3'3
suggests. -I.n" -"."g", *h., giu.. nrde., and r:xplicit instructions
to experienced
people, for instance' is not lez.cli,.'g but actually irnpeding productlvity. Planrring
effectively helps one to become a manager; enabling others to plan effectively
isle"ding.Leadersempower--'theygivepeop,lethethingstheyngedtOgrow'to change, I.rd to cope with cha'ge. Leaders crearp
and share visiot'rs, generatlng
strategies to bring the visions t') realtty'
A"ccording to D"t"t..,, clnris Carey, empowering people r€qrrj1s5 a corporate
culturethatmakesempowerlllentacorevalue.Hiscompanyworkr:dhar:dtc,cre- ate a culture tt"t rr"r-'"r "its,:clre values: horresty, openness' effIpowerlTlent'
and
acceptance of failure'" 1o
JohnKotterandJamesFleskett,irtCo,'rporateCulture_,'lndPer|ormance, listed organizations that hacl rnade maior culiural changes"fhe
[cederr; of rhese
;;;;;";i;rs first had to realize that change was needed.. Then they had to com-
municate to employees the Iacts that point,ed to:r crisis or lPotelltial crisis' so
il;;;1"y.., *ouiJp..cei'e the need ro change. Finally, as l(.tter a.r1 Heskett
described, Performed as follows:
deuelopedorclarifiedtl'.teiruisio.nsc',fwhatchangeswereneeded'...After perceiuingsomeminimt.tmreadinesstlnthepartofthei.rmanagers,tbe iiodrrc th"en began comntunicating their uisi'cns of
wbat cltangt:s were nec-
essary.Theseui'sionsalut'ayscarri"d.so*egemeraltnessdge;.aboutkeycon- stituencres, rspn'iotiy '"t;tLmers""
IAlso] itcluded u'as in'formation aLt<tut
more specific strategies Ltnd practices that w'ere seen (ts needed to tleal u"itb
the cuirent business clift'ate or competitiue situation'| l
CHAPTER l5 Lea'lersnrP
*. planning: The extent to which a leader de,:ides how to organize and schedule lvork ef{iciently, plans how to tttain work-unit obiecives'
and makes contingerrcy plans for potential problems
Exonple:My supervisgr suggested a shortcut that allows us to prepare our finarrcial statements in three days instead of the four days
it
used to take.
ll. Coordinating: The r:xtent to which a lead,:r coordinates the work of subordinalles, emphasizes the importante of coordination' and
encourages subordinates to coordinate their activities'
Exonple:My supervisor encouraged subordinates who were ahead in their work to help those who were behind' By helping
each
otn.i ar the different parts 0f the prolect will be ready at the samr: time.
15. work facilitation: Ihe extent to which a leader obtains for subordinates any necessry supplies, equipment, support services' or other
resources; eliminate; problems in the worl< environment; and removes other ob$acles that interfere with the work'
Exomple:|askedmybosstoordersomes'upp|ies,andheanangedtogetthenrrightaway.
16. Repr*cilarion: I he extent t0 which a klader establishes contacls with other lgroups and important
people n the organization,
oersuades them to appreciate and support the leaderb work unit, and influences superiors and outsiders to
promote and defend the
interesls of the worl: unit.
Exonple:My supennsor met with the datrr processing manager to ask for revisions to the computer
program:;' The revised programs
will meet our needs more ef{ectively'
17. tntenction facililrtion: The extent to urhich a leader tries to gel subordinates to be filendly with each othtr, cooperate, share
information and idera:;, and help each oth'3r'
Exomple:rhe sales manager took the group out to lunch to give r:verybody a chance to get to know the neur sales representatrve'
l& Gonflict managenrent The extent to wlrich a leader restrains subordinates flom fighting and arguing, encc'urages them to resolve
--- .*ni,fr in a coistru<live manner, and he:lps settle disagreement; between subordinates'
Exomple:rwomembers of the department who were working together on a project had a dispute The manager met
with them to help
resolve the matter.
lg. criticismdisriplirne: The extent to which a leader critrcizes or disciplines a subordinate who shows consistently poor performance,
violates a rule, or 6sobeis an order. Disciplinary actions include rtfficial warnings, reprimands, suspensions, and dismissals'
Exomple:rhesuperrvrsgr, concerned that a subordinate repeatedly made the:;ame kinds of errors, made sure that the
subordinate was
aware of expectations concerning quality
futrce: Leodershipinorgoniat,ions,p r0bycaryull (o1981 byprenticeHall, Inc. lrdaptedwithp,e:rmissionof PearsonEducaton, lnc,UpptrsaddleRiver'NJ
g,458.
As the leaders,.sisions ancl strategies were collLveled, thLey won allics and
became role models; for other manaLgeri. "Their ability tD change and play a use-
ful leadership rol. n4;.,"led that othi, could also."12 Such leaders:rre often called
,i"r7rr*"ri"nal ltti'ders because they are able to create fundamental changes in
their organizarions,values, missioni and cultures. Figr.rre: 13,.4, which is based
o., ;otr.r"fo,ter,s *c,rk, f.rrth". differentiates between l:nanagement a.d leader-
ship. Notice how l(,ctter's list of leadership behavirlrs emphasiz:es people skills
and motivational c'onnecttons' Kotter notes that "A few ... corporate change efforts have
bei:n very success-
ful. A few have bee' utter failures. liost fall s'mewhere in betvreen, with a distinct
tilt toward the lou,er: end of the scarle."13 why so fevr-big successi:s? Management
iln g., tt".f. in the planning phase or be trapped with a culture'.a decision struc-
i"t.ip.".ti.es, and people who resist change' "A paralyzed ":1'::3,i'iagement often'comes from hcrving too many nlanagers and not erlotlgh
leaoers' "