|
Rating
|
Excellent
|
Good
|
Acceptable
|
Developing
|
Unacceptable
|
Score
|
|
Points
|
40-36
|
35-32
|
31-28
|
27-24
|
23 - 0
|
SCORE
|
|
Career Paper
(40 points for this section)
|
- Managerial accounting is described in detail.
- Difference between managerial and financial accounting is described in detail.
- Users of financial and managerial accounting information are identified correctly.
- How managerial accounting information is useful for decision-making was defined.
- The profession of managerial accounting was revealed with certain jobs identified.
- The role of ethics for a managerial accountant was presented through and explanation of the IMA Statement of Ethical Practice.
|
Details of at least one of the required elements to the left are weakly presented or missing.
|
Details of at least two of the required elements to the left are weakly presented or missing.
|
Details of at least three of the required elements to the left are weakly presented or missing.
|
Details of at least four of the required elements to the left are weakly presented or missing.
|
|
|
Writing & Grammar (1 point each)
|
|
Criterion
|
Factor
|
Level of Performance
|
Level of Performance
|
Level of Performance
|
|
|
|
Satisfactory - 1
|
Developing – 1/2
|
Unsatisfactory - 0
|
|
Content
|
Thesis Statement
|
Easily Identifiable and Clearly Stated Thesis; Establishes a Point of View
|
Somewhat Identifiable or Ambiguous Thesis and Point of View
|
Not Identifiable Thesis and Point of View
|
|
|
Development
|
Focuses on and Fulfills the Thesis Statement
|
Diverges from Focus and Development of Thesis Statement
|
Fails to Focus on and Develop Thesis Statement
|
|
|
Support
|
Ample, Relevant, and Specific Support Addressing Multiple Perspectives of the Thesis
|
Limited or Overly General Support and Minimal Perspectives Addressed
|
Lacks Sufficient Support or Provides Irrelevant Support
|
|
|
Citations
in-text
references
|
Appropriately Formatted and Support
Thesis
|
Lapses in Appropriate Format and/or Support for Thesis
|
Missing , Irrelevant, or No Useful Documentation
|
|
Organization
|
Logical Order
|
Clear Order and Structure with an Introduction, Body and Conclusion
|
Lapses in Order and Structure
|
Lacking Order and Unstructured
|
|
|
Transitions/ Connection of Ideas
|
Uses a Variety of Appropriate Transitions, and Establishes Connections to Thesis
|
Lapses in Transitions and Disjointed Connection of Ideas
|
Lacks Transitions and Does Not Connect Ideas
|
|
Writing Conventions
|
Word Level
word choice
diction
|
Appropriate Academic Language, Variety, Word Choice and Usage
|
Limited Academic Vocabulary and Lapses in Word Choice and Usage
|
Simplistic Vocabulary, Incorrect Word Choice, Numerous Errors in Word Usage
|
|
|
Sentence Level
syntax,
run-ons, fragments, agreement
|
Complete and Correct Sentences, Varied in Structure and Length
|
Little Sentence Variety, Some Interference with Meaning, and Simple or Repetitive Constructions
|
No Variety in Sentences, Errors in Structure That Interfere with Reader's Understanding
|
|
|
Mechanics
punctuation, capitalization, spelling
|
Few Mechanical Errors. Meaning is not Compromised
|
Some Mechanical Errors that Occasionally Interfere with Meaning
|
Many Mechanical Errors that Seriously Interfere with Meaning
|
|
|
Document Design
page layout, margins, indentations
|
Paper Properly Formatted
|
Inconsistent Formatting
|
Lacks Proper Format
|
|
Total Overall Points
(out of 10)
|
|
|
|
|
josDse
acc122_careerpaper_rubric.docx
0
