I need someone helps me to write a Rhetorical Analysis essay

College is incredibly expensive, and it can even prevent an individual’s dream of someday attending their university of choice. With college tuition, room and board, and the various other fees involved in attending school nowadays, students and concerned families around the country wonder what else could possibly happen to make prices increase. One of the leading disputes occurring at the moment is whether or not universities should compensate student athletes. People believe this particular situation cannot necessarily benefit non-student athletes because it could potentially lead to an even larger increase in college fees for the average person. Furthermore, if student athletes do receive compensation, then they would lose the title and true meaning of being an “amateur athlete.” Nonetheless, there is still a substantial number of people who believe student athletes should be paid. In order to find out more about this topic, I studied Anthony J. Miller’s article “NCAA Division I Athletics: Amateurism and Exploitation”, which was posted in The Sport Journal on January 1, 2011. Miller’s message focuses on two major terms, amateurism and exploitation, and how each differentiates with the other. Also, he tells how it has an effect on the average student athlete. Miller uses a combination of credible author theories, specific terms, and real life examples in order to relay his message to his audience.

Miller’s article attempts to discover universities motives to exploit student athletes. Miller states the definition of “exploitation” used by A. Wertheimer, Senior Research Scholar at the Department of Bioethics, as “an individual gaining something by taking an unfair advantage of another individual.” On the other side of the argument, “amateurism” is simply defined as not receiving compensation in exchange of athletic or physical performance. According to Miller, the NCAA envisions its student athletes to be strictly students and not employees to their school in any way. In the article, Miller’s purpose is to distinguish between what it means to be exploited or remain amateur. He also explains how the two terms coexist and fit in with the current issue. Miller’s use of specific terminology offers readers a sense of credibility, especially when referring to Wertheimer.

Miller begins his article by briefly explaining how intercollegiate athletics came to be what it is today. Ultimately, Miller uses logical and historical facts detailing back to the beginning of the NCAA and how they have handled and treated student athletes in the past. Miller states that intercollegiate athletics began as student-run organizations and basically generated no profit for the individuals partaking in the events. As a result, the NCAA formed and college athletics practically transformed into a “multi-billion dollar industry” (Miller). Miller relates past to present in this excerpt and focuses on the many differences that have formed over the years.

Miller refers to noteworthy authors and their take on how the two terms connect, thus creating much credibility for his own article. To begin the main idea of his article, Miller focuses on a variety of arguments set forth by A. Wertheimer. Miller choses an argument that focuses on the effects of exploiting student athletes and how it may harm themselves as people. The specific phrase stated by Wertheimer is that “student-athletes (B) are being exploited by schools (A) because A is profiting thousands, sometimes millions, from B’s efforts while B is receiving nothing of lasting significance.”

In short, Miller intends to pull an audience in a way that would make people feel sympathetic for the athletes and the athletes’ futures. This is a prime example of using emotional strains in order to reach out to an audience without trying to manipulate them. This is a crucial point used in the article that really drags

Later in the text, Miller describes “mutually advantageous exploitation” (Miller). Miller defines mutually advantageous exploitation as meaning what one person gains from the other, the other person gains as well. This scenario dictates that both individuals end up in a much more favorable position than they were in before the event took place. Miller then goes on to give a brief occurrence of a talented high school male athlete from a low income family who got signed to a university with not only a great basketball program, but was also a prominent academic institution. Miller summarizes the success story of this individual by saying that he participated in the school’s basketball program and led his school to a couple of Final Four appearances in the NCAA Tournament as well as win a national championship. The student athlete then went on to be selected in the NBA Draft and receive several multi-million dollar contracts. In this case, no harm has been done in terms of exploitation. Miller uses the strategy of real life accounts and examples to strengthen his argument and make his audience follow what he is saying. This tactic is a way to get the audience more involved and know what is really going on.

Miller’s article reflects the culture of a university’s ability to recruit and sign student athletes. In addition to college culture, this issue also relates to the average student who is not an athlete. Most importantly, the text relates to the imperative feature of what it truly means to be a student athlete. Student athletes should always be considered amateurs in what they do. After all, they should be attending school in order to obtain a quality education.

To summarize, Miller’s article regarding compensation of student athletes begins with how the NCAA came to this standstill issue in the first place. He then describes the various types of amateurism and exploitation, which both terms have a deep impact on an individual’s beliefs regarding the issue. These two terms make up the bulk of the article and are used to describe every type of college student and what it means to be considered amateur or exploited. To conclude his article, Miller recaps all of the ethical questions and problems that result from this issue and that are being discussed today. Miller composed a professional opinionated essay using specific terminology and author accounts in order to fully back up his argument.

Work Cited

Miller, Anthony W. "NCAA Division I Athletics: Amateurism and Exploitation." The Sport Journal. 1 Jan. 2011. HighBeam Research. Web. 26 Jun. 2013.