75 Question English Exam
specific peer reviewed articles. useful database recommendations. the names of useful subject-specific resources. reference books. |
teeter-totter square peg evidence triangle |
Credibility Relevance of subject matter Ease with which it was found online Expertise of author |
link scholars to clear positions. selectively pick data to support their own views. identify foundational theories and positions. Start to see structure of a conversation. |
To avoid conflict To summarize the achievements of others To complicate the issues To offer something new and interesting |
True False |
Fear of looking foolish prevents writers from excelling. Time and effort are the most important criteria to better writing. Writing what you believe readers will want to hear will help you overcome fear. Modeling your own writing on someone else’s will help you overcome fear. |
one subordinate clause. a predicate. a subject and a verb. one noun phrase. |
the guilt-trip fallacy. the argument-from-envy fallacy. the red herring fallacy. the argument-from-pity fallacy. |
Author's Last Name, Initials. (Publication Year). Title of book. Location: Publisher Author's Last Name, Initials. Title of book. Location: Publisher (Publication Year) Title of book. Author’s Last Name, First Name. Location: Publisher (Publication Year) Title of book. Author’s Last Name, Initials. Location: Publisher (Publication Year) |
It is formed after consulting existing research. It has an obvious “yes” or “no” answer. It includes large generalizations on several topics. It features very emotional language that is casual in tone. |
Fill a gap in knowledge. Evaluate the effectiveness of a methodology. Argue based upon a personal belief. Solve problems. |
Writers should follow a strict schedule and not skip around. Students should avoid locating new sources and be satisfied with what has been written. Writers should review their work and revise periodically. Students must work ahead and complete upcoming stages early. |
It can show that your research is well rounded. It can undermine your own argument and render it less persuasive. It can challenge your credibility as a trustworthy researcher. It can cause you to misuse sources. |
The school board finally announced their decision Friday. He was audited because he was never on time with his taxes. The dog was running so fast that it crashed into the fence. Mary didn’t think she was in trouble, but she was in trouble. |
an interesting problem to be solved. a potential affirmation of faith and beliefs. an area with limited perspectives and little to uncover. a randomly selected topic being researched by force. |
Accessing Google Scholar’s broad database Using a specialized database at a library Searching the dictionary Viewing specific encyclopedias online |
One that includes other researchers’ analysis One that offers just facts or information One that offers you new perspectives One that includes at least one of the BEAM elements |
expert testimony. historical narrative. facts/statistics. guesswork. |
attaching the fragment to a nearby complete sentence. revising the fragment to include whatever is missing, such as a subject or verb. rewriting the fragment so that it expresses a complete thought. All of the above |
True False |
Try writing about your confusion. Copy/paste the views of another author. Go looking for more sources. Pick another research topic. |
The reasonableness of the researcher’s argument Proof of credentialed and professional writing Financial backing from a large corporation An indication of evidence and engagement with other researchers |
Reminding readers of the logic of your argument Conveying your most important idea Asking a series of general questions related to the topic Emphasizing your contributions to the conversation |
provide new information to reinterpret previous researchers’ findings. examine corrections to possible errors in previous research. repeat well-established information without further discussion. explore answers to questions arising from previous research. |
How other researchers have framed their questions What existent data proved useful in previous research Popular opinions on their topic False starts other researchers have taken |
it explains the contents of a source with quotes and citations. it articulates ideas in a complex manner that ties analysis together. it explains implications of ideas and the importance of the research. it encourages readers to pursue the topic further. |
True False |
historical drama. a secondary source. a primary source. None of the above |
Understanding the sequence of ideas Understanding patterns in ideas Understanding relationships between evidence Understanding concepts in the abstract |
Survey the writing for overviews and summaries first. Clear your mind of questions and expectations. Avoid making comparisons to other writings. Consider what the writer knows instead of what you believe you know. |
establish the limited nature of your views and experiences. test your views and experiences by including other evidence. describe your values and experiences so that you win the debate. consider the values and experiences of others. |
The federal government has had a courteous and supportive relationship with Planned Parenthood and other women’s health facilities for decades; however, funding from federal coffers should not be spent on procedures that are deemed unethical and murderous in the eyes of taxpayers. In this paper, I will explain my views on abortion. This paper will show that women’s health issues are important in America today and why Planned Parenthood should continue to receive federal funding. |
ending the sentence where the comma is and starting a new sentence. replacing the comma with a semicolon to connect the two independent clauses. All of the above None of the above |
Subject search Keyword search Dictionary search Author/title search |
to locate open-ended questions for further consideration. to find new ways to gather and interpret data. to discover new questions to ask. to uncover new relationships. |
Allowing evidence to speak for itself Showing a clear, logical connection Letting common sense prevails Staying firm to personal beliefs |
dismissal from the university. a failing course grade. a failing assignment grade. All of the above |
The expertise to use logic to solve a problem The ability to provide a clear answer to a question Open-mindedness about alternative thinking The discipline to conduct research thoroughly |
John bought some new shoes and wore them to a party. We can go see a movie, or we can get something to eat. When you get there, please remember to call me. None of the above |
Inquisitiveness Expertise Persistence Research skills |
True False |
They may be subject to editorial review or review by industry practitioners. They make assertions without always providing readers with verification of evidence. They are written primarily to educate or entertain. They use a broad citation system to document sources. |
discovery of what your research means. determining how to frame an argument. focusing only on proving your thesis. being open-minded about potential changes. |
Providing exhibits to elaborate the problem Filling gaps in conversation Supporting the argument about the causes of a problem Supporting traditional views without question |
True False |
The researcher will get off track on the issue. The writer will lose focus on the main purpose. New data will complicate the issues and cause disarray. The researcher’s understanding will deepen. |
Construct perfectly formed ideas Paraphrase ideas of others Explain complicated passages Respond to significant quotations |
Enclosing words from the writer in quotation marks Using attributional phrases when including a writer’s ideas Summarizing and paraphrasing in your own words without citation Including an in-text citation at the end of the sentence |
True False |
True False |
the straw-man fallacy. the red-herring fallacy. the relativist fallacy. the subjectivist fallacy. |
True False |
Keeping readers’ needs and limits in mind Repeatedly covering known and familiar concepts Complicating ideas as your reader develops knowledge Blending discussion of abstract ideas with concrete examples |
incorrectly – affects is usually a noun. incorrectly – affects is usually a verb. correctly – affects is usually a noun. correctly – affects is usually a verb. |
the post-hoc fallacy. the red-herring fallacy. the group-think fallacy. the hasty-generalization fallacy. |
they insert passion into an otherwise boring discussion. they insist that all people should share the author’s personal values. they encourage us to ignore competing viewpoints. they give too much weight to our own experiences. |
Insight into your perspective Extensive details about your topic Comparison to similar topics Contrasts with familiar topics |
True False |
the puzzling phenomenon you want to explain. a description of your approach to the research. the conclusions you have reached. a summary of different research articles on the topic. |
it has been paraphrased nine times. no page number is available and the quote occurs in the ninth paragraph. the full citation can be found on page nine of the research paper. None of the above |
You must demonstrate knowledge of a subject. You must include credible, scholarly research. You must actively respond to the experts in your writing. You must seek to correct other studies. |
a primary source. a secondary source. a tertiary source. None of the above |
They reveal unseen dimensions to an issue. They create upheaval around issues. They accept common practices and policies. They restate accepted wisdom on an issue. |
Definitive answers External concepts not used as evidence Theories and alternative perspectives A different view of an issue unrelated to essential questions |
Being explicit about your research purpose Being specific in your claims Being clear on the issues you’ll cover Being careful not to take a position |
Elaborate stories that capture the reader’s imagination A measured, serious tone of voice A heated dispute between the writer and opposing viewpoints A dismissive attitude toward alternate ideas |
Writers will probably meet all research needs. Writers will need multiple examples of all four kinds of sources. Any single source will probably feature more than one of the BEAM categories. Writers will only need one source to serve all four functions. |
True False |
True False |
They encourage readers to interpret evidence and think critically. They establish the undisputed facts of the topic. They make a convincing argument on one side of the debate. They display various works of art from different historical eras. |
My short-term goal is to learn how to search the library databases more effectively. One way determination can be learned and developed is by creating short-term goals, such as learning how to use the internet, and long-term goals, like earning a Bachelor's degree. You must be determined to meet your goals in order to succeed. |
credible arguments. accurate information not subject to debate. criticism of other researchers’ work. important methods used to interpret evidence. |
A belief that all information is common knowledge The pressure to succeed at all costs A failure to understand what constitutes plagiarism Thinking that no one will ever notice the plagiarism |
They discover that no resources exist on their topic of interest. They search randomly for general information. They are unfamiliar with Google Scholar and other library databases. They are unaware of differences between academic and popular sources. |