TinselWriter
4.1 Underdevelopment as a Coordination Failure
• A newer school of thought on problems of economic development
• Coordination failures occur when agents’ inability to coordinate their actions leads to
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 4-2
inability to coordinate their actions leads to an outcome that makes all agents worse off.
• This can occur when actions are complementary, i.e.,
• Actions taken by one agent reinforces incentives for others to take similar actions
4.2 Multiple Equilibria: A Diagrammatic Approach
• Often, these models can be diagrammed by graphing an S-shaped function and the 45º line
• Equilibria are
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 4-3
• Equilibria are
– Stable: function crosses the 45º line from above
– Unstable: function crosses the 45º line from below
Figure 4.1 Multiple Equilibria
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 4-4
4.3 Starting Economic Development: The Big Push
• Sometimes market failures lead to a need for public policy intervention
• The Big Push: A Graphical Model, 6 assumptions – One factor of production
– Two sectors
– Same production function for each sector
– Consumers spend an equal amount on each good
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 4-5
– Consumers spend an equal amount on each good
– Closed economy
– Perfect competition with traditional firms operating, limit pricing monopolist with a modern firm operating
• Conditions for Multiple Equilibria • A big push may also be necessary when there are:
– Intertemporal effects
– Urbanization effects
– Infrastructure effects
– Training effects
Figure 4.2 The Big Push
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 4-6
Why the Problem Cannot be Solved by a Super-Entrepreneur
• Super Entrepreneur?
– Capital market failures
– Cost of monitoring managers- Asymmetric Information
– Communication failures
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 4-7
– Communication failures
– Limits to knowledge
– Lack of any empirical evidence that would suggest this is possible
In a Nutshell: Big Push Mechanisms
• Raising total demand
• Reducing fixed costs of later entrants
• Redistributing demand to later periods when other industrializing firms sell
• Shifting demand toward manufacturing goods
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 4-8
• Shifting demand toward manufacturing goods (usually produced in urban areas)
• Help defray costs of essential infrastructure (a similar mechanism can hold when there are costs of training, and other shared intermediate inputs)
4.4 Further Problems of Multiple Equilibria
• Inefficient Advantages of Incumbency
• Behavior and Norms
• Linkages
• Inequality, Multiple Equilibria, and Growth
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 4-9
• Inequality, Multiple Equilibria, and Growth
4.5 Michael Kremer’s O-Ring Theory of Economic Development
• The O-Ring Model
– Production is modeled with strong complementarities among inputs
– Positive assortative matching in production
• Implications of strong complementarities
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 4-10
• Implications of strong complementarities for economic development and the distribution of income across countries
4.6 Economic Development as Self- Discovery
• Hausmann and Rodrik: A Problem of Information
• Not enough to say developing countries should produce “labor intensive products,” because there are thousands of them
• Industrial policy may help to identify true direct and indirect domestic costs of potential products to specialize in, by:
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 4-11
domestic costs of potential products to specialize in, by:
• Encouraging exploration in first stage
• Encouraging movement out of inefficient sectors and into more efficient sectors in the second stage
4.6 Economic Development as Self- Discovery
• Three building blocks of the theory; and case examples of their reasonableness in practice:
– Uncertainty about products can produce efficiently (evidence: India’s success in information technology was unexpected; reasons for Bangladesh’s efficiency in hats vs Pakistan’s in bedsheets is not clear)
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 4-12
in hats vs Pakistan’s in bedsheets is not clear)
– Need for local adaptation (evidence: seen in cases such as shipbuilding in South Korea)
– Imitation can be rapid (e.g. the spread of cut flower exporting in Colombia)
4.7 The Hausmann-Rodrik-Velasco Growth Diagnostics Framework
• Focus on a country’s most binding constraints on economic growth
• No “one size fits all” in development policy
• Requires careful research to determine the
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 4-13
• Requires careful research to determine the most likely binding constraint
Figure 4.3 Hausmann-Rodrik-Velasco Growth Diagnostics Decision Tree
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 4-14
Concepts for Review
• Agency costs
• Asymmetric information
• Big push
• Complementarity
• Congestion
• Information externality
• Linkage
• Middle-income trap
• Multiple equilibria
• O-ring model
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 4-15
• Coordination failure
• Deep intervention
• Economic agent
• Growth diagnostics
• O-ring production function
• Pareto improvement
• Pecuniary externalities
• Poverty trap
• Prisoners’ dilemma
Concepts for Review (cont’d)
• Social returns
• Technological externality
• Underdevelopment trap
• Where-to-meet dilemma
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 4-16