i need help with a chemistry lab report?
Malansari23
report_instructions_.xlsxSheet1
| Pts earned | Pts available | Item | Validity |
| Point Code: Missing (0), Inadequate (1), needs Improvement(2) Complete (3). If Total not 3 than scores are 0, 50, 75, or 100% of total | |||
| Title | Paper Chromatography Partial | ||
| 1 | Descriptive title that refers to the main point(s) in the report and is not the one from the manual. Also includes Partner, TA, and section. Plug in deduction as negative number. (0, 0.5, 0.75, 1) | ✔ | |
| Purpose | |||
| 3 | This can be a listing of several points, goals, and or claims. They should include both general and detailed purposes. Was the goal the answer to a scientific question, identification of a compound, or develop a technique or something else? | ✔ | |
| 3 | What will the final claim (conclusion) be? If you know the claim, it can clarify what the purpose was or should have been. (Normally you would start with the purpose and proceed toward the claim at the end) | ✔ | |
| 0 | 6 | Purpose Total | ✔ |
| Introduction | |||
| 3 | Explain what chromatography is, the theory behind it, and why we’re using it here. | ✔ | |
| 1 | Explain what a mobile phase is and explain what a stationary phase is. (0, .5, .75, or 1) | ✔ | |
| 1 | Include and explain Rf equation. Numbered. (0, .5, .75, or 1) | ||
| 3 | Why do some analytes move faster than others? | ✔ | |
| 3 | Include hypothesis (or purpose) | ✔ | |
| 1 | Intext citations (0, .5, .75, or 1) | ||
| 3 | Overall quality of the introduction and setup for the full report. | ||
| 0 | 15 | Introduction Total | ✔ |
| Experimental | |||
| 1 | Citation of handout | ✔ | |
| 3 | Brief, clear description of the procedure so the reader need not have the manual to understand the data and discussion. | ✔ | |
| 1 | Details of any changes (omissions/ additions), Mentioned specifically changes – 2.5 cm on paper, toothpicks, etc. | ✔ | |
| 1 | Written in paragraph form, not a list of steps. | ✔ | |
| 0 | 6 | Experimental Total | ✔ |
| Data & Results | Two tables - no discussion necessary | ||
| 3 | Table 1 for food dyes | ✔ | |
| 3 | Table 2 for M&M dyes. (including identification of matching Food dyes if any) | ✔ | |
| 0 | 6 | Data & Results Total | ✔ |
| Discussion & Conclusion | Answers to question (7) (0, 0.5, 0.75, 1) | ||
| 1 | Question 1 a and b | ✔ | |
| 1 | Question 2 | ✔ | |
| 1 | Question 3 | ✔ | |
| 1 | Question 4 | ✔ | |
| 1 | Question 5 | ✔ | |
| 1 | Question 6 | ✔ | |
| 1 | Question 7 | ✔ | |
| 0 | 7 | Discussion Total | ✔ |
| References | |||
| 1 | Listed more than one reference (minimum 2) Lary Sanders: Lary Sanders: Change - compare with Spectroxc., others & 1220. Need more flexibility?? plagarism | ✔ | |
| 1 | Listed reference in APA MLA or ACS format | ✔ | |
| Deduction: Information from sources not cited. ( paraphrased - no intext citation but referenced -2, direct quote but did not intext site but did reference-4 , direct quote/copy not referenced - AIV process) | |||
| 1 | Used in-text citations | ✔ | |
| 0 | 3 | References Total | ✔ |
| Total | Other considerations | ||
| 3 | Proper use of spelling, grammar, and punctuation | ✔ | |
| 3 | Report Organized (lacks coherence (0) , minimal organization (1), some areas of difficulty (2), Org. enhances ideas (3 ) | ||
| 3 | Writing has good flow and sentence fluency | ||
| Other Deduction or addition (Explain) | |||
| 0 | 53 | Report Overall Grade | ✔ |
| 0.00 | Report Percentage | ||
| 0.00 | 25.00 | Out of 25 points | |
| Late Points | max days | ||
| 20 | 20 | Days Late | |
| -25 | -25 | Point deduction for late work (calculated automatically). | ✔ |
| -25.0 | total points | ||
| 0.00 | 25 | Final Report Points out of 25 | |
| 0.0% | 100.0% | Final Report percentage out of 100% |
Comments:
