Writing Assignment
Excellent (5 pts.) Good (4 pts.) Fair (3 pts.) Below Expectations (2 pts.) Poor (1 pt.)
Content Specifically defines 3 strengths/themes in your
own words.
Content is very easy to understand.
Clearly defines 3 strengths/themes in your
own words though not as
in-depth.
Content is easy to understand though there
are a few ideas or
sentences that are unclear
or are wordy.
Generally defines 3 strengths/themes and/or
does not thoroughly
define in your own words.
Content can generally be understood but ideas are
not specific and can be
difficult to interpret.
Defines 3 strengths/themes but does not define them in
your own words.
Content can be understood but ideas are basic, brief,
and choppy.
Does not have all of the
requirements of
the assignment.
Content is unclear and
ideas are not
very well
articulated.
Organization Well-organized and easy to read.
Sequence is logical and effective.
Has strong, embedded transitions.
Format is standardized with well-defined
headings.
Nicely organized though the format could be easier
to read.
Format is mostly standardized though some
headings are not easy to
define.
Attempts to organize the material though it is not
easy to read and headings
are not well defined.
Reflects no attempt to establish order.
Some categories are defined while others are not defined
at all.
Organization causes
confusion.
Details/Support Uses specific examples from professional or from
personal experiences to
highlight strengths/themes.
Uses interesting, varied and ample detail, which
engages the reader.
Uses specific examples from class or from personal
experiences to highlight
strengths/themes.
Uses a great deal of interesting, varied and
ample detail, but does not
paint a full picture
Uses specific examples from class or from
personal experiences to
highlight claim/s
Uses a moderate amount of detail, but still leaves
the reader with a cloudy
image and more questions
Uses general examples from class or from personal
experiences to highlight
claim/s
Uses general examples to convey experience or
personal assessment but not
specific enough.
Missing specific
examples or
details.
Professional
Writing
Contains sentences that vary in beginning,
structure and length.
Writing is professional.
Contains some sentences that vary in beginning,
structure and length.
Writing is solid but could be more professional.
Contains limited sentences that vary in
beginning structure and
length.
Writing is good but uses colloquial terms.
Contains simple, repetitive sentence beginnings,
structure and length.
Has short, choppy sentences.
Writing is too casual
No sentence structure.
Writing is unclear and too
casual.
Technical
Writing
Uses correct capitalization.
Writes with correct grammar and usage
(subject/verb agreement,
irregular noun forms, verb
forms).
Uses correct spelling and writing is professional.
Uses correct capitalization most of the time.
Uses correct end punctuation
Attempts to write with correct grammar and usage;
occasional errors do not
distort meaning.
Uses spelling that is usually correct, especially
on common words.
Uses inconsistent capitalization.
Uses end punctuation inconsistently.
Makes errors in grammar and usage that may
interfere with meaning.
Misspells common words.
Uses incorrect capitalization.
Uses incorrect end punctuation; or omits
punctuation
Makes frequent errors in grammar and usage that
affect meaning.
Makes frequent spelling errors that significantly
impair readability.
Errors make it difficult to
understand.