Aims and background Choosing an appropriate market entry mode is an important decision-making process for international businesses when they expand their business to foreign markets. Appropriate decision on entry mode is more likely to occur when solid an

profiledodo123
simtopic5.ppt

International Business: Actions
Internationalisation Theories and Practices (I)

Business College

School of Management

Key Questions

  • What approaches to global strategy do firms take?
  • How do organisations internationalise?
  • How does international business manage its internal operations globally?
  • How does international business manage its external operations (e.g. relationship with the host country/communities)?

Key Learning Objective

  • This session will help you to understand the concepts of:

1) Michael E. Porter’s Diamond Model

2) Global Strategy – Ghosal & Nohria Matrix

3) Born Global Concept

Michael E. Porter’s Diamond Model

  • Porter argues that nations can create factors that promote competitive advantage of nations as well as stronger level of FDI.

RMIT University

School of Management

*

School of Management

Examples of National competitive Advantages

  • Abundant, low-cost labor in China
  • Mass of IT workers in India
  • Huge reserves of bauxite in Australia
  • Abundant agricultural land in the USA
  • Oil in Saudi Arabia

RMIT University

School of Management

*

School of Management

Michael E. Porter’s Diamond Model

RMIT University

School of Management

*

School of Management

Michael Porter’s Diamond Model:
Sources of National Competitive Advantage

Firm strategy, structure, and rivalry – the presence of strong competitors at home serves as a national competitive advantage

Factor conditions – labour, natural resources, capital, technology, entrepreneurship, and know how

Demand conditions at home – the strengths and sophistication of customer demand

Related and supporting industries – availability of clusters of suppliers and complementary firms with distinctive competences

RMIT University

School of Management

*

School of Management

*

Industrial Clusters

  • A concentration of suppliers and supporting firms from the same industry located within the same geographic area
  • Examples include: the Silicon Valley, fashion cluster in northern Italy, pharma cluster in Switzerland, footwear industry in Pusan, South Korea, and the IT industry in Bangalore, India
  • Can serve as a nation’s export platform

RMIT University

School of Management

*

School of Management

National Policy

  • Proactive economic development plan enacted by the government to nurture or support promising industries sectors.
  • Typical initiatives:

Tax incentives

Investment incentives

Monetary and fiscal policies

Rigorous educational systems

Investment in national infrastructure

Strong legal and regulatory systems

  • (Examples: Japan, Dubai, and Ireland)

RMIT University

School of Management

*

School of Management

Activity 1: Diamond Model

  • Please discuss the concept of Porter’s diamond model and apply it to one industry in one country.

RMIT University

School of Management

*

School of Management

Bartlett and Ghoshal’s Model of Internationalization Strategy

RMIT University

School of Management

*

School of Management


Source: Adapted from Bartlett and Ghoshal (1991)., Managing Acrocc Border, Harvard Business Press.

*

International strategy

  • Create value by transferring valuable core competencies to foreign markets that local competitors lack.
  • Centralise product development functions at home
  • Establish manufacturing and marketing functions in local country but head office exercises tight control over it
  • Limit customization of product offering and market strategy

Strategy effective if firm faces weak pressures for local responsive and cost reductions

Multidomestic strategy

  • Main aim is maximum local responsiveness.
  • Customize product offering, market strategy including production, and R&D according to national conditions
  • Generally unable to realize value from experience curve effects and location economies.
  • Possess high cost structure.

Global strategy

  • Focus is on achieving a low cost strategy by reaping cost reductions that come from experience curve effects and location economies.
  • Production, marketing, and R&D concentrated in few favorable functions.
  • Market standardized product to keep cost low.
  • Effective where strong pressures for cost reductions and low demand for local responsiveness.

Transnational strategy

  • To meet competition firms aim to reduce costs, transfer core competencies while paying attention to pressures for local responsiveness
  • Global learning

Valuable skills can develop in any of the firm’s world wide operations

Transfer of knowledge from foreign subsidiary to home country, to other foreign subsidiaries

  • Transnational strategy difficult task due to contradictory demands placed on the organization

Example : Caterpillar

Activity 2: IB Strategies in Action

  • In your team, please select one MNC and discuss their strategy and identify which of the 4 strategies that best suits your company. Why? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the strategy?

Born Global

  • The ‘Born Global’ concept was coined in a survey for The Australian Manufacturing Council by the McKinsey Consultants
  • In Australia, a new breed of exporting companies, which contributed substantially to the nation's export capital, was then emerging. The creation of these exporters though not unique to the Australian economy, reflects 2 fundamental phenomena of the 1990s:

1.Small is beautiful

2.Gradual internationalization is dead

Born Global

  • Amongst the Born Global firms, in Australia, there are several high-tech firms, but the typical firm uses well-known technology.
  • These firms have experienced higher growth rates than other industries in Australia and a large growth in their export compared to their home-market sales.
  • A major factor in the explanation of the Born Global phenomenon (McKinsey & Co., 1993) is the management’s commitment to internationalization.
  • Another major factor is the firm’s ability to standardize production, marketing, etc. in a global niche instead of developing customized products.

Factors Supporting ‘Born Global’

  • Dramatic increases in speed, quality and efficiency of international communication and transportation have reduced the transaction costs of multinational interchange.
  • Increasing homogenization of many markets in distant countries has made the conduct of international business easier to understand by everyone.
  • International financing opportunities are increasingly available.
  • Human capital is internationally mobile.

Activity: Born Global
[Synthesise]

  • In your team, please select 1 company that is considered ‘Born Global’ and identify factors promoting the company to become a ‘born global’ company.

References

  • Ghoshal, S., & Nohria, N. (1993), “Horses for courses: Organizational forms for multicultural corporations”, Sloan Management Review, Winter 1993, pp. 27, 31.
    Johanson, J., Vahlne, J.-E. (1977), "The internationalization process of the firm – a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments", Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 8 No.1, pp.23-32.
  • Madsen, T.K., Servais, P. (1997), "The internationalization of born globals: an evolutionary process?", International Business Review, Vol. 6 No.6, pp.551-81.
  • Oviatt, B.M., McDougall, P.P. (1994), "Toward a theory of international new ventures", Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 25 No.1, pp.45-64.
  • Oviatt, B.M., McDougall, P.P. (1995), "Global start-ups: entrepreneurs on a worldwide stage", Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 9 No.2, pp.30-44.

Future Reading

Anderson, Erin and Hubert Gatignon. 1986. Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis.  Journal of International Business Studies, 17: 1-26.

Kogut, B. and H. Singh. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19: 411-432.

- Hennart, J.-F. and Y.-R. Park. 1993. Greenfield vs. acquisition: The strategy of Japanese investors in the United States. Management Science, 39(9): 1054-1070.

- Hennart, J. F., and Reddy, S. 1997. The Choice Between Mergers/Acquisitions and Joint Ventures: The Case of Japanese Investors in the United States. Strategic Management Journal 18: 1-12.

- Barkema, H. G. and Vermeulen, F. 1998. International Expansion Through Start-up or Acquisition: A Learning Perspective. Academy of Management Journal 41: 7-26.

- Brouthers, K. D. and Brouthers, L. E. 2000. Acquisition or Greenfield Start-up? Institutional, Cultural and Transaction Cost Influences. Strategic Management Journal 21: 89-97.