Simulation Review

Criterion

Unsatisfactory

Satisfactory

Exceptional

1. Content

Phase I: Cost cutting options, loan selection, and outcomes.

Did not identify which cost cutting or loan options were selected or the outcomes of the selection

Identified the cost cutting options and loan selected as well as the outcome of the decisions

In addition to meeting the requirements of satisfactory, compared/contrasted the decisions made to the optimal decisions recommended by the simulation and explained/defended decisions

Score

0

2

3

Phase II: Funding options for equipment acquisition and the outcomes of the decisions

Did not identify the selected funding options

Identified the equipment acquisition strategies and their outcomes

In addition to meeting the requirements of satisfactory, compared/contrasted the decisions made to the optimal decisions recommended by the simulation and explained/defended decisions

Score

0

2

3

Phase III: Funding options for capital expansion and the outcome of the decision

Did not identify the selected funding option

Identified the selected funding option and the outcome of that decision

In addition to meeting the requirements of satisfactory, compared/contrasted the decisions made to the optimal decisions recommended by the simulation and explained/defended decisions

Score

0

2

3

Summary: What did you learn, what would you do differently, and how will you apply this in the future

Did not explain what was learned or what would be done differently or how it would be applied in the future.

Provided an explanation of what was learned, what would be done differently and how it will be applied in the future.

Score

0

1

N/A

2. Organization/Development

Quality and Organization of the Writing

The paper does not meet the target word length and/or is poorly organized with clumsy transitions from point to point and introductory and summary paragraphs may not be fully developed or engage the reader.

The paper meets the target word length but is poorly organized with clumsy transitions from point to point and introductory and summary paragraphs may not be fully developed or engage the reader.

The paper is very well organized with introductory paragraph that engages the reader, summary paragraph that communicates writer’s perspectives and excellent transition from point to point.

Score

0

4

6

3. Mechanics

APA Requirements, Spelling, Grammar, and Citation

The paper is not formatted correctly in accordance with APA requirements, contains several spelling and grammatical errors and references are not correctly cited

The paper is materially formatted correctly in accordance with APA requirements and contains minor spelling and grammatical errors.

The paper is formatted correctly in accordance with APA requirements and contains no spelling or grammatical errors.

Score

0

3

4

Comments

Final Score: 20