Operations Mang CASE 2

profilelilkittingurl
process_strategy.ppt

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Process, Volume, and Variety

Process Focus

projects, job shops (machine, print, carpentry)

Standard Register

Repetitive

(autos, motorcycles)

Harley Davidson

Product Focus

(commercial baked goods, steel, glass)

Nucor Steel

High Variety

one or few units per run, high variety

(allows customization)

Changes in Modules

modest runs, standardized modules

Changes in Attributes (such as grade, quality, size, thickness, etc.)

long runs only

Mass Customization

(difficult to achieve, but huge rewards)

Dell Computer Co.

Poor Strategy (Both fixed and variable costs are high)

Figure 7.1

Volume

Low Volume

Repetitive Process

High Volume

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Process Flow Diagram

Figure 7.2

Accounting

PRINTING DEPT

COLLATING DEPT

GLUING, BINDING, STAPLING, LABELING

POLYWRAP DEPT

SHIPPING

Vendors

Receiving

Warehouse

Purchasing

PREPRESS DEPT

Customer

Customer sales representative

Information flow

Material flow

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Process Strategies

  • How to produce a product or provide a service that
  • Meets or exceeds customer requirements
  • Meets cost and managerial goals
  • Has long term effects on
  • Efficiency and production flexibility
  • Costs and quality

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Process Strategies

Four basic strategies

  • Process focus
  • Repetitive focus
  • Product focus
  • Mass customization

Within these basic strategies there are many ways they may be implemented

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Process Focus

  • Facilities are organized around specific activities or processes
  • General purpose equipment and skilled personnel
  • High degree of product flexibility
  • Typically high costs and low equipment utilization
  • Product flows may vary considerably making planning and scheduling a challenge

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Process Focus

Print Shop

Many inputs

High variety of outputs

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Repetitive Focus

  • Facilities often organized as assembly lines
  • Characterized by modules with parts and assemblies made previously
  • Modules may be combined for many output options
  • Less flexibility than process-focused facilities but more efficient

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Repetitive Focus

Automobile Assembly Line

Raw materials and module inputs

Modules combined for many output options

Few modules

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Process Flow Diagram

Figure 7.3

Oil tank work cell

Shocks and forks

Handlebars

Fender work cell

Air cleaners

Fluids and mufflers

Fuel tank work cell

Wheel work cell

TESTING

28 tests

Roller testing

THE ASSEMBLY LINE

Engines and transmissions

Incoming parts

From Milwaukee on a JIT arrival schedule

Frame tube bending

Frame-building work cells

Frame machining

Hot-paint

frame painting

Crating

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Product Focus

  • Facilities are organized by product
  • High volume but low variety of products
  • Long, continuous production runs enable efficient processes
  • Typically high fixed cost but low variable cost
  • Generally less skilled labor

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Product Focus

Bottling Plant

Many inputs

Output variation in size, shape, and packaging

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Product Focus

Nucor Steel Plant

Continuous caster

Continuous cast steel sheared into 24-ton slabs

Hot tunnel furnace - 300 ft

Hot mill for finishing, cooling, and coiling

D

E

F

G

H

I

Scrap steel

Ladle of molten steel

Electric furnace

A

B

C

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Comparison of Processes

Table 7.2

Process Focus (Low volume, high variety) Repetitive Focus (Modular) Product Focus (High-volume, low-variety) Mass Customization (High-volume, high-variety)
Small quantity, large variety of products Long runs, standardized product made from modules Large quantity, small variety of products Large quantity, large variety of products
General purpose equipment Special equipment aids in use of assembly line Special purpose equipment Rapid changeover on flexible equipment

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Comparison of Processes

Table 7.2

Process Focus (Low volume, high variety) Repetitive Focus (Modular) Product Focus (High-volume, low-variety) Mass Customization (High-volume, high-variety)
Operators are broadly skilled Employees are modestly trained Operators are less broadly skilled Flexible operators are trained for the necessary customization
Many job instructions as each job changes Repetition reduces training and changes in job instructions Few work orders and job instructions because jobs standardized Custom orders require many job instructions

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Comparison of Processes

Table 7.2

Process Focus (Low volume, high variety) Repetitive Focus (Modular) Product Focus (High-volume, low-variety) Mass Customization (High-volume, high-variety)
Raw material inventories high JIT procurement techniques used Raw material inventories are low Raw material inventories are low
Work-in-process is high JIT inventory techniques used Work-in-process inventory is low Work-in-process inventory driven down by JIT, lean production

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Comparison of Processes

Table 7.2

Process Focus (Low volume, high variety) Repetitive Focus (Modular) Product Focus (High-volume, low-variety) Mass Customization (High-volume, high-variety)
Units move slowly through the plant Movement is measured in hours and days Swift movement of unit through the facility is typical Goods move swiftly through the facility
Finished goods made to order Finished goods made to frequent forecast Finished goods made to forecast and stored Finished goods often made to order

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Comparison of Processes

Table 7.2

Process Focus (Low volume, high variety) Repetitive Focus (Modular) Product Focus (High-volume, low-variety) Mass Customization (High-volume, high-variety)
Scheduling is complex, trade-offs between inventory, availability, customer service Scheduling based on building various models from modules to forecasts Relatively simple scheduling, establishing output rate to meet forecasts Sophisticated scheduling required to accommodate custom orders

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Comparison of Processes

Table 7.2

Process Focus (Low volume, high variety) Repetitive Focus (Modular) Product Focus (High-volume, low-variety) Mass Customization (High-volume, high-variety)
Fixed costs low, variable costs high Fixed costs dependent on flexibility of the facility Fixed costs high, variable costs low Fixed costs high, variable costs must be low
Costing estimated before job, not known until after job is complete Costs usually known due to extensive experience High fixed costs mean costs dependent on utilization of capacity High fixed costs and dynamic variable costs make costing a challenge

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Mass Customization

  • The rapid, low-cost production of goods and service to satisfy increasingly unique customer desires
  • Combines the flexibility of a process focus with the efficiency of a product focus

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Mass Customization

Table 7.1

Vehicle models 140 260

Vehicle types 18 1,212

Bicycle types 8 19

Software titles 0 300,000

Web sites 0 46,412,165

Movie releases 267 458

New book titles 40,530 77,446

Houston TV channels 5 185

Breakfast cereals 160 340

Items (SKUs) in 14,000 150,000

supermarkets

Number of Choices

Early 21st
Item Early 1970s Century

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Mass Customization

Modular techniques

Effective scheduling techniques

Rapid throughput techniques

Figure 7.5

Mass Customization

Repetitive Focus

Modular design

Flexible equipment

Process-Focused

High variety, low volume

Low utilization (5% to 25%)

General-purpose equipment

Product-Focused

Low variety, high volume

High utilization (70% to 90%)

Specialized equipment

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Crossover Charts

Figure 7.6

Fixed costs

Variable costs

$

High volume, low variety

Process C

Fixed costs

Variable costs

$

Repetitive

Process B

Fixed costs

Variable costs

$

Low volume, high variety

Process A

Fixed cost Process A

Fixed cost Process B

Fixed cost Process C

Total cost

Total cost

Total cost

V1

(2,857)

V2

(6,666)

400,000

300,000

200,000

Volume

$

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Changing Processes

  • Difficult and expensive
  • May mean starting over
  • Process strategy determines transformation strategy for an extended period
  • Important to get it right

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Process Analysis and Design

  • Flow Diagrams - Shows the movement of materials
  • Time-Function Mapping - Shows flows and time frame
  • Value Stream Mapping - Shows flows and time and value added beyond the immediate organization
  • Process Charts - Uses symbols to show key activities
  • Service Blueprinting - focuses on customer/provider interaction

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Time-Function Mapping

Figure 7.7

Customer

Sales

Production control

Plant A

Warehouse

Plant B

Transport

Move

Receive product

Extrude

Wait

Move

Wait

Print

Wait

Order product

Process order

Wait

12 days

13 days

1 day

4 days

1 day

10 days

1 day

0 day

1 day

52 days

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Time-Function Mapping

Figure 7.7

Customer

Sales

Production control

Plant

Warehouse

Transport

Move

Receive product

Extrude

Wait

Print

Order product

Process order

Wait

1 day

2 days

1 day

1 day

1 day

6 days

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Process Chart

Figure 7.8

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Service Blueprint

  • Focuses on the customer and provider interaction
  • Defines three levels of interaction
  • Each level has different management issues
  • Identifies potential failure points

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Service Blueprint

Level

#3

Figure 7.9

Personal Greeting

Service Diagnosis

Perform Service

Friendly Close

Customer arrives for service

Warm greeting and obtain service request

Direct customer to waiting room

Notify customer the car is ready

Customer departs

Customer pays bill

Perform required work

Prepare invoice

Yes

Yes

Level

#1

Level

#2

Potential failure point

Notify
customer
and recommend
an alternative
provider

No

Standard request

Determine specifics

Can
service be
done and does customer approve?

No

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Process Analysis Tools

  • Flowcharts provide a view of the big picture
  • Time-function mapping adds rigor and a time element
  • Value stream analysis extends to customers and suppliers
  • Process charts show detail
  • Service blueprint focuses on customer interaction

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Service Process Matrix

Figure 7.10

Degree of Customization

Low

High

Degree of Labor

Low

High

Mass Service

Professional Service

Service Factory

Service Shop

Private banking

Commercial banking

Law clinics

General-

purpose law firms

Specialized hospitals

Hospitals

Limited-service stockbroker

Full-service stockbroker

Boutiques

Warehouse and catalog stores

Retailing

Fast food restaurants

Fine-dining restaurants

No frills airlines

Airlines

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Service Process Matrix

  • Labor involvement is high
  • Selection and training highly important
  • Focus on human resources
  • Personalized services

Mass Service and Professional Service

Service Factory and Service Shop

  • Automation of standardized services
  • Low labor intensity responds well to process technology and scheduling
  • Tight control required to maintain standards

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Improving Service Productivity

Table 7.3

Strategy Technique Example
Separation Structure service so customers must go where service is offered Bank customers go to a manager to open a new account, to loan officers for loans, and to tellers for deposits
Self-service Self-service so customers examine, compare, and evaluate at their own pace Supermarkets and department stores, internet ordering

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Improving Service Productivity

Table 7.3

Strategy Technique Example
Postponement Customizing at delivery Customizing vans at delivery rather than at production
Focus Restricting the offerings Limited-menu restaurant
Modules Modular selection of service, modular production Investment and insurance selection, prepackaged food modules in restaurants

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Improving Service Productivity

Table 7.3

Strategy Technique Example
Automation Precise personnel scheduling Automatic teller machines
Scheduling Precise personnel scheduling Scheduling ticket counter personnel at 15-minute intervals at airlines
Training Clarifying the service options, explaining how to avoid problems Investment counselor, funeral directors, after-sale maintenance personnel

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Equipment and Technology

  • Often complex decisions
  • Possible competitive advantage
  • Flexibility
  • Stable processes
  • May allow enlarging the scope of the processes

*

© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

7 – *

Improving Service Processes

  • Layout
  • Product exposure, customer education, product enhancement
  • Human Resources
  • Recruiting and training
  • Impact of flexibility

*