Operations Mang CASE 2
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Process, Volume, and Variety
Process Focus
projects, job shops (machine, print, carpentry)
Standard Register
Repetitive
(autos, motorcycles)
Harley Davidson
Product Focus
(commercial baked goods, steel, glass)
Nucor Steel
High Variety
one or few units per run, high variety
(allows customization)
Changes in Modules
modest runs, standardized modules
Changes in Attributes (such as grade, quality, size, thickness, etc.)
long runs only
Mass Customization
(difficult to achieve, but huge rewards)
Dell Computer Co.
Poor Strategy (Both fixed and variable costs are high)
Figure 7.1
Volume
Low Volume
Repetitive Process
High Volume
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Process Flow Diagram
Figure 7.2
Accounting
PRINTING DEPT
COLLATING DEPT
GLUING, BINDING, STAPLING, LABELING
POLYWRAP DEPT
SHIPPING
Vendors
Receiving
Warehouse
Purchasing
PREPRESS DEPT
Customer
Customer sales representative
Information flow
Material flow
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Process Strategies
- How to produce a product or provide a service that
- Meets or exceeds customer requirements
- Meets cost and managerial goals
- Has long term effects on
- Efficiency and production flexibility
- Costs and quality
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Process Strategies
Four basic strategies
- Process focus
- Repetitive focus
- Product focus
- Mass customization
Within these basic strategies there are many ways they may be implemented
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Process Focus
- Facilities are organized around specific activities or processes
- General purpose equipment and skilled personnel
- High degree of product flexibility
- Typically high costs and low equipment utilization
- Product flows may vary considerably making planning and scheduling a challenge
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Process Focus
Print Shop
Many inputs
High variety of outputs
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Repetitive Focus
- Facilities often organized as assembly lines
- Characterized by modules with parts and assemblies made previously
- Modules may be combined for many output options
- Less flexibility than process-focused facilities but more efficient
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Repetitive Focus
Automobile Assembly Line
Raw materials and module inputs
Modules combined for many output options
Few modules
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Process Flow Diagram
Figure 7.3
Oil tank work cell
Shocks and forks
Handlebars
Fender work cell
Air cleaners
Fluids and mufflers
Fuel tank work cell
Wheel work cell
TESTING
28 tests
Roller testing
THE ASSEMBLY LINE
Engines and transmissions
Incoming parts
From Milwaukee on a JIT arrival schedule
Frame tube bending
Frame-building work cells
Frame machining
Hot-paint
frame painting
Crating
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Product Focus
- Facilities are organized by product
- High volume but low variety of products
- Long, continuous production runs enable efficient processes
- Typically high fixed cost but low variable cost
- Generally less skilled labor
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Product Focus
Bottling Plant
Many inputs
Output variation in size, shape, and packaging
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Product Focus
Nucor Steel Plant
Continuous caster
Continuous cast steel sheared into 24-ton slabs
Hot tunnel furnace - 300 ft
Hot mill for finishing, cooling, and coiling
D
E
F
G
H
I
Scrap steel
Ladle of molten steel
Electric furnace
A
B
C
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Comparison of Processes
Table 7.2
| Process Focus (Low volume, high variety) | Repetitive Focus (Modular) | Product Focus (High-volume, low-variety) | Mass Customization (High-volume, high-variety) |
| Small quantity, large variety of products | Long runs, standardized product made from modules | Large quantity, small variety of products | Large quantity, large variety of products |
| General purpose equipment | Special equipment aids in use of assembly line | Special purpose equipment | Rapid changeover on flexible equipment |
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Comparison of Processes
Table 7.2
| Process Focus (Low volume, high variety) | Repetitive Focus (Modular) | Product Focus (High-volume, low-variety) | Mass Customization (High-volume, high-variety) |
| Operators are broadly skilled | Employees are modestly trained | Operators are less broadly skilled | Flexible operators are trained for the necessary customization |
| Many job instructions as each job changes | Repetition reduces training and changes in job instructions | Few work orders and job instructions because jobs standardized | Custom orders require many job instructions |
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Comparison of Processes
Table 7.2
| Process Focus (Low volume, high variety) | Repetitive Focus (Modular) | Product Focus (High-volume, low-variety) | Mass Customization (High-volume, high-variety) |
| Raw material inventories high | JIT procurement techniques used | Raw material inventories are low | Raw material inventories are low |
| Work-in-process is high | JIT inventory techniques used | Work-in-process inventory is low | Work-in-process inventory driven down by JIT, lean production |
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Comparison of Processes
Table 7.2
| Process Focus (Low volume, high variety) | Repetitive Focus (Modular) | Product Focus (High-volume, low-variety) | Mass Customization (High-volume, high-variety) |
| Units move slowly through the plant | Movement is measured in hours and days | Swift movement of unit through the facility is typical | Goods move swiftly through the facility |
| Finished goods made to order | Finished goods made to frequent forecast | Finished goods made to forecast and stored | Finished goods often made to order |
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Comparison of Processes
Table 7.2
| Process Focus (Low volume, high variety) | Repetitive Focus (Modular) | Product Focus (High-volume, low-variety) | Mass Customization (High-volume, high-variety) |
| Scheduling is complex, trade-offs between inventory, availability, customer service | Scheduling based on building various models from modules to forecasts | Relatively simple scheduling, establishing output rate to meet forecasts | Sophisticated scheduling required to accommodate custom orders |
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Comparison of Processes
Table 7.2
| Process Focus (Low volume, high variety) | Repetitive Focus (Modular) | Product Focus (High-volume, low-variety) | Mass Customization (High-volume, high-variety) |
| Fixed costs low, variable costs high | Fixed costs dependent on flexibility of the facility | Fixed costs high, variable costs low | Fixed costs high, variable costs must be low |
| Costing estimated before job, not known until after job is complete | Costs usually known due to extensive experience | High fixed costs mean costs dependent on utilization of capacity | High fixed costs and dynamic variable costs make costing a challenge |
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Mass Customization
- The rapid, low-cost production of goods and service to satisfy increasingly unique customer desires
- Combines the flexibility of a process focus with the efficiency of a product focus
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Mass Customization
Table 7.1
Vehicle models 140 260
Vehicle types 18 1,212
Bicycle types 8 19
Software titles 0 300,000
Web sites 0 46,412,165
Movie releases 267 458
New book titles 40,530 77,446
Houston TV channels 5 185
Breakfast cereals 160 340
Items (SKUs) in 14,000 150,000
supermarkets
Number of Choices
Early 21st
Item Early 1970s Century
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Mass Customization
Modular techniques
Effective scheduling techniques
Rapid throughput techniques
Figure 7.5
Mass Customization
Repetitive Focus
Modular design
Flexible equipment
Process-Focused
High variety, low volume
Low utilization (5% to 25%)
General-purpose equipment
Product-Focused
Low variety, high volume
High utilization (70% to 90%)
Specialized equipment
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Crossover Charts
Figure 7.6
Fixed costs
Variable costs
$
High volume, low variety
Process C
Fixed costs
Variable costs
$
Repetitive
Process B
Fixed costs
Variable costs
$
Low volume, high variety
Process A
Fixed cost Process A
Fixed cost Process B
Fixed cost Process C
Total cost
Total cost
Total cost
V1
(2,857)
V2
(6,666)
400,000
300,000
200,000
Volume
$
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Changing Processes
- Difficult and expensive
- May mean starting over
- Process strategy determines transformation strategy for an extended period
- Important to get it right
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Process Analysis and Design
- Flow Diagrams - Shows the movement of materials
- Time-Function Mapping - Shows flows and time frame
- Value Stream Mapping - Shows flows and time and value added beyond the immediate organization
- Process Charts - Uses symbols to show key activities
- Service Blueprinting - focuses on customer/provider interaction
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Time-Function Mapping
Figure 7.7
Customer
Sales
Production control
Plant A
Warehouse
Plant B
Transport
Move
Receive product
Extrude
Wait
Move
Wait
Wait
Order product
Process order
Wait
12 days
13 days
1 day
4 days
1 day
10 days
1 day
0 day
1 day
52 days
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Time-Function Mapping
Figure 7.7
Customer
Sales
Production control
Plant
Warehouse
Transport
Move
Receive product
Extrude
Wait
Order product
Process order
Wait
1 day
2 days
1 day
1 day
1 day
6 days
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Process Chart
Figure 7.8
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Service Blueprint
- Focuses on the customer and provider interaction
- Defines three levels of interaction
- Each level has different management issues
- Identifies potential failure points
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Service Blueprint
Level
#3
Figure 7.9
Personal Greeting
Service Diagnosis
Perform Service
Friendly Close
Customer arrives for service
Warm greeting and obtain service request
Direct customer to waiting room
Notify customer the car is ready
Customer departs
Customer pays bill
Perform required work
Prepare invoice
Yes
Yes
Level
#1
Level
#2
Potential failure point
Notify
customer
and recommend
an alternative
provider
No
Standard request
Determine specifics
Can
service be
done and does customer approve?
No
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Process Analysis Tools
- Flowcharts provide a view of the big picture
- Time-function mapping adds rigor and a time element
- Value stream analysis extends to customers and suppliers
- Process charts show detail
- Service blueprint focuses on customer interaction
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Service Process Matrix
Figure 7.10
Degree of Customization
Low
High
Degree of Labor
Low
High
Mass Service
Professional Service
Service Factory
Service Shop
Private banking
Commercial banking
Law clinics
General-
purpose law firms
Specialized hospitals
Hospitals
Limited-service stockbroker
Full-service stockbroker
Boutiques
Warehouse and catalog stores
Retailing
Fast food restaurants
Fine-dining restaurants
No frills airlines
Airlines
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Service Process Matrix
- Labor involvement is high
- Selection and training highly important
- Focus on human resources
- Personalized services
Mass Service and Professional Service
Service Factory and Service Shop
- Automation of standardized services
- Low labor intensity responds well to process technology and scheduling
- Tight control required to maintain standards
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Improving Service Productivity
Table 7.3
| Strategy | Technique | Example |
| Separation | Structure service so customers must go where service is offered | Bank customers go to a manager to open a new account, to loan officers for loans, and to tellers for deposits |
| Self-service | Self-service so customers examine, compare, and evaluate at their own pace | Supermarkets and department stores, internet ordering |
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Improving Service Productivity
Table 7.3
| Strategy | Technique | Example |
| Postponement | Customizing at delivery | Customizing vans at delivery rather than at production |
| Focus | Restricting the offerings | Limited-menu restaurant |
| Modules | Modular selection of service, modular production | Investment and insurance selection, prepackaged food modules in restaurants |
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Improving Service Productivity
Table 7.3
| Strategy | Technique | Example |
| Automation | Precise personnel scheduling | Automatic teller machines |
| Scheduling | Precise personnel scheduling | Scheduling ticket counter personnel at 15-minute intervals at airlines |
| Training | Clarifying the service options, explaining how to avoid problems | Investment counselor, funeral directors, after-sale maintenance personnel |
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Equipment and Technology
- Often complex decisions
- Possible competitive advantage
- Flexibility
- Stable processes
- May allow enlarging the scope of the processes
*
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
7 – *
Improving Service Processes
- Layout
- Product exposure, customer education, product enhancement
- Human Resources
- Recruiting and training
- Impact of flexibility
*