Case Study BMGT 364

profileBigricker12
case_study_1_bmgt.docx

Case Study #1: Planning and Organizing

Instructions

 

Case Study #1:  Planning and Organizing

 

Students will read the case study that focuses on mission and vision, organizational structure and change and organizational culture and respond to the following requirements.

 

You have been hired as a consultant to help Joseph Jackson solve his organizational problems. You are to create a mini-management plan that structures the entire company.  The mini-management plan will include a mission and vision, structure and culture.

 

Resource that will help you develop the mini-management plan:

 

How to Make a Management Plan

http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/leadership/effective-manager/management-plan/main

 

Required Elements to Include in the Management Plan:

· Create mission and vision statements that align with what Joseph Jackson envisions for his company and explain why these statements are appropriate for Cyber Software, Inc;

· Create an organizational structure that aligns with the vision of Joseph Jackson

·  Explain why the structure is the most appropriate structure for Cyber Software, Inc;

· Explain why the other structures were not selected. (Must be accurate and use critical thinking when detailing why you chose a structure over another.)

· Illustrate the structure with an organizational chart with names, job titles, and direct reports;

· Develop profiles (bio that focuses on the jobs held including current position) for the management team (Be creative);

· Discuss in detail the culture Joseph Jackson will create for his new organizational structure and how he will make those changes;

· How will the changes in the organizing facet of the P-O-L-C framework prevent future mishaps;

· In completing this assignment students are to use critical thinking and use the jargon learned in the course. In doing so, students must use facts from the case study and make connections with concepts ideas and theories identified in the eBook.

 

Required Formatting of the Management Plan:

 

· This paper should be double-spaced, 12-point font, and between 5-7 pages in length excluding the title page and reference page.

· Title page with your name, the course name, the date, and the instructor’s name.

· An introductory paragraph, a summary paragraph and the use of headings are required;

· Use APA formatting for in-text citations and reference page.  You are expected to paraphrase and not use quotes other than in identifying the mission statement and vision statement.

·

· Write in the third person;

·

· ****Paper must site to textbook****

· Must have headings

· 1 inch margins

· 12pt times new roman.

· Must

 

Cyber Software, Inc Case Study

Planning and Organizing

Cyber Software, Inc. is a medium size manufacturer of cyber protection software products. The company has gross sales of 20 million dollars. Expenses are approximately 8 million dollars leaving an after tax profit of 10 million dollars per annum. Some of their major clients include local retail businesses as well as state and municipal governments. One medium sized client is the Baltimore City Government. Yesterday, the city found that their website was hacked and credit card information provided to pay water, sewer, real estate tax, and parking tickets was accessed. It was suspected that the hacking was part of the recent attacks by Russian cyber thieves.

Joseph Jackson is the CEO and owner of the corporation. Fortunately for Jackson the company was able to respond quickly and only 275 people were affected by the hacking. However, this was a wake up call for Jackson. He knew that if he was to continue growing the business he would have to develop better software as well as fast clean up procedures for the victims. Jackson felt it was imperative that the company always remain on the cutting edge of the industry so that his customers felt safe and trusted the company’s work. He took pride in the fact that the company has been capable of keeping his client’s information safe. In reaction to the break in at the City, and wanting to keep their business moving forward, Jackson decided that he would set up a separate division to work on new program development and a third division to focus on victim clean up and damage control. The third division he thought would provide a good selling point to potential new clients as none of his competitors offered this service.

The new development division required the hiring of four new program developers with extensive cyber security background. They all had good skills and some had actual experience in helping to uncover a few cyber thieves in the Target incident. They were creative and motivated to help protect people from having their property stolen. Knowing the nature of programmers Jackson did not structure the new development division so their progress or program approach was left to the programmers. In fact Jackson, in general, tried to keep the company as a whole free from a bureaucratic or structured environment. A year into the project the four programmers began to diverge so much in their programming approach that it became extremely expensive and in some ways they were wasting resources by covering similar ground. Nobody could agree as to which course was most effective.

In the client customer service division two programmers were hired as well as two experienced credit specialists, and two paralegals. Further, the division’s lack of structure has allowed a few strong personalities to emerge and the individuals cannot seem to get along. Like the new development division, customer service seems to be spinning their wheels in developing standard procedures and credit protection help for victims.

Also, both divisions were pulling people from their existing clients to help work on the project. Jackson knew that interfacing with ongoing work would help but it was ad hoc and disturbing existing work. Jackson could see that he would have to rethink his position on structure and “free” work environment if the company was to continue to grow.

It was time for an organizational structure and plan. A review of the budget revealed that the company could afford to allocate $1,500,000 to the operation of the two divisions before they have a sellable product. Existing salaries and expenses are at $750,000. This means that they have one year to get viable projects on the market.

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/img/0/Shared.Main.actHide.png?v=10.3.0.791-144Hide Rubrics

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/img/0/Shared.Main.infInfo.gif?v=10.3.0.791-144

Rubric Name: Written Assignment (20%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Criteria

Outstanding

Superior

Good

Substandard

Failure

Critical Thinking/Reasoning

7 points

demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking, is consistent in accurately interpreting questions & material; provides solid assumptions, reasoning & claims; provides thorough analysis & evaluation with sound conclusions

5.95 points

shows good critical thinking; accurately interprets most questions & material; usually identifies relevant arguments/reasoning/claims; offers good analysis & evaluation with fairly sound conclusions

5.25 points

shows occasional critical thinking; questions & material is at times accurately interpreted; arguments/reasoning/claims are occasionally explained; offers fair analysis & evaluation with a conclusion

4.55 points

shows little critical thinking, misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates; justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions

3.85 points

lacks critical thinking consistently offers biased interpretations; ignores or superficially evaluates; argues using poor reasoning, and/or unwarranted claims

Application of Concepts/Development

7 points

arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts

5.95 points

arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate student’s understanding of the material and concepts

5.25 points

arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material

4.55 points

arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; student may resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the material

3.85 points

a meaningful attempt to explain or support ideas does not exist

Attention to Instructions

3 points

demonstrated full understanding of requirements; responded to each aspect of assignment

2.55 points

demonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment

2.25 points

demonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment

1.95 points

failed to show a firm understanding of requirements; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment

1.65 points

did not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements

Clarity; including grammar

2 points

writing is clear and easy to follow; grammar and spelling are all correct; formatting gives a professional look and adds to readability

1.7 points

most ideas are presented clearly; occasional spelling and/or grammar issues

1.5 points

wordy; some points require rereading to understand fully; more than an occasional spelling and/or grammar

1.3 points

unclear and difficult to understand; frequent spelling and grammar issues

1.1 points

largely incomprehensible writing/poorly written in terms of mechanics and structure

Adherence to APA style (6th ed.)

1 point

no APA style errors

0.85 points

attempts in-text citation and reference list but 1 or 2 APA style errors are present

0.75 points

attempts in-text citation and reference list; APA style errors are present; inconsistencies in citation usage can be found throughout the document

0.65 points

attempts either in-text citation or reference list but omits the other

0.55 points

no attempt at APA style

Overall Score

Outstanding 18 or more

Superior 16 or more

Good 14 or more

Substandard 12 or more

Failure 0 or more