Business Requirements
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
| Points: 110 |
Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements |
||||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 60% F |
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
Section 1: Business Requirements Document |
|||||
|
1ai. Describe and define the scope of the project. Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely described and defined the scope of the project. |
Insufficiently described and defined the scope of the project. |
Partially described and defined the scope of the project. |
Satisfactorily described and defined the scope of the project. |
Thoroughly described and defined the scope of the project. |
|
1aii. Speculate as to how to control the scope. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely speculated as to how to control the scope. |
Insufficiently speculated as to how to control the scope. |
Partially speculated as to how to control the scope. |
Satisfactorily speculated as to how to control the scope. |
Thoroughly speculated as to how to control the scope. |
|
1aiii. Identify possible risks, constraints, and assumptions. Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely identified possible risks, constraints, and assumptions. |
Insufficiently identified possible risks, constraints, and assumptions. |
Partially identified possible risks, constraints, and assumptions. |
Satisfactorily identified possible risks, constraints, and assumptions. |
Thoroughly identified possible risks, constraints, and assumptions. |
|
1aiv. Describe the relationship and integration between systems and infrastructure. Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely described the relationship and integration between systems and infrastructure. |
Insufficiently described the relationship and integration between systems and infrastructure. |
Partially described the relationship and integration between systems and infrastructure. |
Satisfactorily described the relationship and integration between systems and infrastructure. |
Thoroughly described the relationship and integration between systems and infrastructure. |
|
1av. Speculate upon potential outsourcing or offshoring needs. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely speculated upon potential outsourcing or offshoring needs. |
Insufficiently speculated upon potential outsourcing or offshoring needs. |
Partially speculated upon potential outsourcing or offshoring needs. |
Satisfactorily speculated upon potential outsourcing or offshoring needs. |
Thoroughly speculated upon potential outsourcing or offshoring needs. |
|
1avi. Identify and justify the necessary resources including staffing that are necessary. Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely identified and justified the necessary resources including staffing that are necessary. |
Insufficiently identified and justified the necessary resources including staffing that are necessary. |
Partially identified and justified the necessary resources including staffing that are necessary. |
Satisfactorily identified and justified the necessary resources including staffing that are necessary. |
Thoroughly identified and justified the necessary resources including staffing that are necessary. |
|
1avii. Define relevant terms that will be used throughout project. Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely defined relevant terms that will be used throughout project. |
Insufficiently defined relevant terms that will be used throughout project. |
Partially defined relevant terms that will be used throughout project. |
Satisfactorily defined relevant terms that will be used throughout project. |
Thoroughly defined relevant terms that will be used throughout project. |
|
1b. 2 references Weight: 5% |
No references provided |
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
|
Section 2: Revised Project Plan |
|||||
|
2. Update the project plan from Project Deliverable 1: Project Plan Inception, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) sub-tasks. Weight: 5% |
Did not submit or incompletely updated the project plan from Project Deliverable 1: Project Plan Inception, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) sub-tasks. |
Insufficiently updated the project plan from Project Deliverable 1: Project Plan Inception, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) sub-tasks. |
Partially updated the project plan from Project Deliverable 1: Project Plan Inception, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) sub-tasks. |
Satisfactorily updated the project plan from Project Deliverable 1: Project Plan Inception, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) sub-tasks. |
Thoroughly updated the project plan from Project Deliverable 1: Project Plan Inception, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) sub-tasks. |
|
3. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% |
More than 8 errors present |
7-8 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |