|
Points: 200
|
Assignment 2: Human Resource Strategy
|
|
Criteria
|
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
|
Fair
70-79% C
|
Proficient
80-89% B
|
Exemplary
90-100% A
|
|
1. Compare and contrast the two (2) industries you have identified in terms of size, products, services, customers, economic and regulatory environment. Weight: 20%
|
Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the two (2) industries you identified in terms of size, products, services, customers, economic and regulatory environment.
|
Partially compared and contrasted the two (2) industries you identified in terms of size, products, services, customers, and economic and regulatory environment.
|
Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the two (2) industries you identified in terms of size, products, services, customers, economic and regulatory environment.
|
Thoroughly compared and constrasted the two (2) industries you identified in terms of size, products, services, customers, economic and regulatory environment.
|
|
2. Describe the mission, vision, values and core business practices of each of the companies you selected.
Weight: 15%
|
Did not submit or incompletely described the mission, vision, values and core business practices of each of the companies you selected.
|
Partially described the mission, vision, values and core business practices of each of the companies you selected.
|
Satisfactorily described the mission, vision, values and core business practices of each of the companies you selected.
|
Thoroughly described the mission, vision, values and core business practices of each of the companies you selected.
|
|
3. Recommend three to five (3-5) possible HR strategies that will support each organization’s mission, vision, values and core business practices for each company. Support your recommendations.Weight: 20%
|
Did not submit or incompletely recommended three to five (3-5) possible HR strategies that would support each organization’s mission, vision, values and core business practices for each company or support your recommendations.
|
Partially recommended three to five (3-5) possible HR strategies that would support each organization’s mission, vision, values and core business practices for each company. Partially supported your recommendations.
|
Satisfactorily recommended three to five (3-5) possible HR strategies that would support each organization’s mission, vision, values and core business practices for each company. Satisfactorily supported your recommendations
|
Thoroughly recommended three to five (3-5) possible HR strategies that would support each organization’s mission, vision, values and core business practices for each company. Thoroughly supported your recommendations.
|
|
4. Identify how your recommended HR strategies will promote a competitive advantage for each company within their industry. Provide a rationale for your position.Weight: 20%
|
Did not submit or incompletely identified how your recommended HR strategies would promote a competitive advantage for each company within their industry. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.
|
Partially identified how your recommended HR strategies would promote a competitive advantage for each company within their industry. Partially provided a rationale for your response.
|
Satisfactorily identified how your recommended HR strategies would promote a competitive advantage for each company within their industry. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.
|
Thoroughly identified how your recommended HR strategies would promote a competitive advantage for each company within their industry. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.
|
|
5. 4 references
Weight: 5%
|
No references provided
|
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.
|
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
|
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
|
|
6. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting
Weight: 5%
|
Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
|
Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
|
Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
|
Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
|
|
7. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and reference section
Weight: 5%
|
Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section.
|
In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style.
|
Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style.
|
In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style.
|
|
8. Information Literacy/Integration of Sources
Weight: 5%
|
Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations.
|
Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
|
Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
|
Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
|
|
9. Clarity and Coherence of Writing
Weight: 5%
|
Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
|
Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
|
Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
|
Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
|