qick 6 to 8

profilekelinc
week_4_assignment_1_grading_rubric.2html.html

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 250

Assignment 1: Organizational Analysis

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Describe the organization, what it does, the customers it serves, and its size.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely described the organization, what it does, the customers it serves, and its size.

Insufficiently described the organization, what it does, the customers it serves, and its size.

Partially described the organization, what it does, the customers it serves, and its size.

Satisfactorily described the organization, what it does, the customers it serves, and its size.

Thoroughly described the organization, what it does, the customers it serves, and its size.

2. Research the organization’s mission statement. Discuss the role HR will play (or does play) in fostering the organization’s mission statement. Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely researched the organization’s mission statement; did not submit or incompletely discussed the role HR will play (or does play) in fostering the organization’s mission statement.

Insufficiently researched the organization’s mission statement; insufficiently discussed the role HR will play (or does play) in fostering the organization’s mission statement.

Partially researched the organization’s mission statement; partially discussed the role HR will play (or does play) in fostering the organization’s mission statement.

Satisfactorily researched the organization’s mission statement; satisfactorily discussed the role HR will play (or does play) in fostering the organization’s mission statement.

Thoroughly researched the organization’s mission statement; thoroughly discussed the role HR will play (or does play) in fostering the organization’s mission statement.

3. Assess the common HR challenges facing this organization (e.g., high turn-over, low wages, lack of skilled workers, etc.). Recommend an HR strategy you would implement to overcome the challenges assessed.

Weight: 30%

Did not submit or incompletely assessed the common HR challenges facing this organization (e.g., high turn-over, low wages, lack of skilled workers, etc.); did not submit or incompletely recommended an HR strategy you would implement to overcome the challenges assessed.

Insufficiently assessed the common HR challenges facing this organization (e.g., high turn-over, low wages, lack of skilled workers, etc.); insufficiently recommended an HR strategy you would implement to overcome the challenges assessed.

Partially assessed the common HR challenges facing this organization (e.g., high turn-over, low wages, lack of skilled workers, etc.); partially recommended an HR strategy you would implement to overcome the challenges assessed.

Satisfactorily assessed the common HR challenges facing this organization (e.g., high turn-over, low wages, lack of skilled workers, etc.); satisfactorily recommended an HR strategy you would implement to overcome the challenges assessed.

Thoroughly assessed the common HR challenges facing this organization (e.g., high turn-over, low wages, lack of skilled workers, etc.); thoroughly recommended an HR strategy you would implement to overcome the challenges assessed.

4. Determine how effective your recommendation above will be to making the organization more competitive.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely determined how effective your recommendation above will be to making the organization more competitive.

Insufficiently determined how effective your recommendation above will be to making the organization more competitive.

Partially determined how effective your recommendation above will be to making the organization more competitive.

Satisfactorily determined how effective your recommendation above will be to making the organization more competitive.

Thoroughly determined how effective your recommendation above will be to making the organization more competitive.

5. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present