qick 6 to 8
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
|
Points: 250 |
Assignment 1: Organizational Analysis |
||||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 60% F |
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Describe the organization, what it does, the customers it serves, and its size. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely described the organization, what it does, the customers it serves, and its size. |
Insufficiently described the organization, what it does, the customers it serves, and its size. |
Partially described the organization, what it does, the customers it serves, and its size. |
Satisfactorily described the organization, what it does, the customers it serves, and its size. |
Thoroughly described the organization, what it does, the customers it serves, and its size. |
|
2. Research the organization’s mission statement. Discuss the role HR will play (or does play) in fostering the organization’s mission statement. Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely researched the organization’s mission statement; did not submit or incompletely discussed the role HR will play (or does play) in fostering the organization’s mission statement. |
Insufficiently researched the organization’s mission statement; insufficiently discussed the role HR will play (or does play) in fostering the organization’s mission statement. |
Partially researched the organization’s mission statement; partially discussed the role HR will play (or does play) in fostering the organization’s mission statement. |
Satisfactorily researched the organization’s mission statement; satisfactorily discussed the role HR will play (or does play) in fostering the organization’s mission statement. |
Thoroughly researched the organization’s mission statement; thoroughly discussed the role HR will play (or does play) in fostering the organization’s mission statement. |
|
3. Assess the common HR challenges facing this organization (e.g., high turn-over, low wages, lack of skilled workers, etc.). Recommend an HR strategy you would implement to overcome the challenges assessed. Weight: 30% |
Did not submit or incompletely assessed the common HR challenges facing this organization (e.g., high turn-over, low wages, lack of skilled workers, etc.); did not submit or incompletely recommended an HR strategy you would implement to overcome the challenges assessed. |
Insufficiently assessed the common HR challenges facing this organization (e.g., high turn-over, low wages, lack of skilled workers, etc.); insufficiently recommended an HR strategy you would implement to overcome the challenges assessed. |
Partially assessed the common HR challenges facing this organization (e.g., high turn-over, low wages, lack of skilled workers, etc.); partially recommended an HR strategy you would implement to overcome the challenges assessed. |
Satisfactorily assessed the common HR challenges facing this organization (e.g., high turn-over, low wages, lack of skilled workers, etc.); satisfactorily recommended an HR strategy you would implement to overcome the challenges assessed. |
Thoroughly assessed the common HR challenges facing this organization (e.g., high turn-over, low wages, lack of skilled workers, etc.); thoroughly recommended an HR strategy you would implement to overcome the challenges assessed. |
|
4. Determine how effective your recommendation above will be to making the organization more competitive. Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely determined how effective your recommendation above will be to making the organization more competitive. |
Insufficiently determined how effective your recommendation above will be to making the organization more competitive. |
Partially determined how effective your recommendation above will be to making the organization more competitive. |
Satisfactorily determined how effective your recommendation above will be to making the organization more competitive. |
Thoroughly determined how effective your recommendation above will be to making the organization more competitive. |
|
5. 3 references Weight: 5% |
No references provided |
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
|
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% |
More than 8 errors present |
7-8 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |