accounting theory revision

profiley0useeefq8
lecture_4_positive_accounting_theory.zip

Lecture 4 Positive Accounting Theory/British Gas.docx

London Evening Standard 27 February 2013

11% profits rise as British Gas increases bills

Jonathan Prynn, Lucy Tobin, and Nicholas Cecil

British Gas sparked fresh fury today as it unveiled an 11 per cent surge in profits just weeks after pushing up bills to record levels.

Britain’s biggest energy supplier was accused of being “contemptuous of its customers” when it revealed that it made £606 million profit last year from the gas and electricity it sold to almost 16 million households.

Consumer groups and Labour MPs ripped into the company — owned by energy giant Centrica — and warned that thousands of pensioners will die this year because they cannot afford to turn the heating on.

British Gas raised its tariffs by six per cent in November, adding about £80 a year to the typical bill. This was despite profits at its residential energy supply arm shooting up by £62 million, or 11 per cent, last year.

Ann Robinson, director of consumer policy at price comparison website uSwitch.com, said: “Asking customers to swallow a six per cent winter price hike and then unveiling an 11 per cent increase in profits is tantamount to waving a red rag at a bull.”

Shadow consumer affairs minister Ian Murray said: “It is unacceptable that the Prime Minister is letting the energy companies get away with inflation-busting price rises when they are already making huge profits and pensioners, in particular, are having to choose whether to heat or eat.”

British Gas also confirmed that managing director Phil Bentley, 54, will step down as its boss at the end of June, although he will remain on the pay-roll until the end of the year “to ensure a smooth transition”. Mr Bentley will leave with Centrica shares, rights to long-term incentive bonuses and a pension pot expected to be worth up to £11 million in total, although he will not get a separate pay-off on top.

Company chiefs were despatched to TV and radio studios to defend the financial results after they were announced in the City at 7am. Centrica chief executive Sam Laidlaw said rises were justified by its huge investment in energy infrastructure to “keep the lights on” and said the profits rise was artificially boosted by the much colder weather last year compared with 2011.

The group needed to make a “fair and reasonable return so that we can continue to make our contribution to society and to invest”. Company bosses said it was “too early” to say whether there would be further tariff rises this year.

Consumer groups called for a more radical root and branch shake-up of Britain’s energy supply market.

Richard Lloyd, executive director of Which? said: “Prices will only be kept as low as possible if there is more effective competition and switching between energy companies.”

Answer the following three questions:

(1) How does this newspaper article relate to PAT’s political cost hypothesis?

(2) Would British Gas have faced similar criticism if it had reported a loss?

(3) What are the political costs British Gas faces as a result of the media attention?

1

Lecture 4 Positive Accounting Theory/PAT 2014 2015.pptx

Lecture 4

Positive Accounting Theory:

Accounting policy choice

1

D&U Chapter 7

R Chapter 5, Chapter 7

Roberts (2004): Criticism of agency theory (on blackboard)

Background reading

2

Positive accounting theories

Explain and predict accounting/financial reporting practice

e.g., why firms use specific accounting methods

Contrast with normative accounting theories

Prescribe how an item should be accounted for or how/when it should be disclosed

The prescription might depart from existing practice

3

Positive accounting theories

Started coming to prominence in mid 1960s

Paradigm shift from normative theories

Dominant research paradigm in 1970s and 1980s

Shift resulted from US reports on business education, and improved computing facilities enabling large-scale statistical analysis

4

Origins of positive accounting theories

5

Agency theory and the role of accounting information

Agency theory

Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

Corporate governance theories

Separation of ownership and control

Management – owners (shareholders)

Management - debt holders (lenders)

Moral hazard

Information asymmetry

Role of accounting in contracting process:

monitoring

bonding

Role of accounting in corporate governance mechanism

Accounting policy choice

Directing and controlling managerial behaviour

Disclosure

Managerial

self-interest:

Reporting bias

6

Agency theory concepts

6

6

Used to understand relationships whereby a principal employs the services of and delegates the decision making authority to an agent

Principal = shareholders

Agent = managers

Jensen and Meckling (1976):

“a contract under which one or more (principals) engage another person (the agent) to perform some service on their behalf which involves delegating some decision-making authority to the agent”

Agency Theory

7

8

Agency relationship

Asymmetric Information

8

8

Creates a moral hazard

Managers may undertake actions detrimental to shareholders

Leads to 3 ‘costs’

Monitoring costs

Bonding costs

Residual loss

Agency Theory

9

Monitoring costs

Costs incurred by principals to measure, observe, and control agent’s behaviour

Auditing, costs of setting up managerial compensation plan

Get passed on to agent

Bonding costs

Costs incurred bonding agent’s interests to those of the principals

Producing and providing financial statements, agreeing to link remuneration to firm performance

Residual loss

10

Agency costs

One particular type of positive accounting theory

Watts & Zimmerman (1978, 1986)

Watts, R. and J. Zimmerman (1978), “Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards,” The Accounting Review 53 (January), pp112-134.

Watts, R. and J. Zimmerman (1986), Positive Accounting Theory, Edgewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

11

Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)

Used to explain and predict accounting policy choice

Why do firms select particular accounting methods in favour of others?

Why do managers lobby regulators in regard to particular accounting methods?

“PAT…is concerned with explaining accounting practice. It is designed to explain and predict which firms will and which firms will not use a particular method…but it says nothing as to which method a firm should use” (Watts & Zimmerman, 1978)

Positive Accounting Theory

12

It examines a range of relationships between the entity and

Suppliers of equity capital (owners)

Managerial labour (management)

Debt capital (lenders or debt holders)

Based on the ‘rational economic person’ assumption

Positive Accounting Theory

13

Contracting theory

Suggests that the organisation is characterised as a legal ‘nexus of contracts’

With contracting parties having rights and responsibilities under these contracts

Positive accounting theory focuses on

Managerial contracts and

Debt contracts

These are agency contracts used to manage relationships where there is a separation between management and capital providers

Positive Accounting Theory

14

Agency theory identifies a number of problems that can exist between managers and owners

Contracts and accounting information can be used to ‘bond’ the interests of owners and managers

Addresses 3 specific problems

Horizon problem

Risk aversion

Dividend retention

Owner–Manager agency relationships

15

Shareholders: long-term horizon

Long-term growth and value of firm

Managers: short-term horizon

Short-term cash flows

Changing jobs, retirement

Short-term profitability

Delay upgrades to equipment, reduce R&D expenditure

Solution: Linking managerial rewards to long-term performance

Bonuses linked to share price, share-based compensation

16

Horizon problem

Shareholders: less risk-averse

Diversification of risk

Managers: more risk-averse

No diversification of risk

Linking bonus to profits

Solution: Limiting share-based compensation as managerial share ownership in the company increases

17

Risk aversion

Shareholders: prefer more dividends

Managers: prefer to maintain greater level of funds within the firm

Expand size of the firm

Pay their own salaries and benefits

Solution: paying bonus linked to dividend payout ratio; linking bonuses to profits

18

Dividend retention

When a lender agrees to provide funds to an entity there is the risk that the lending party may not repay those funds

Agency costs of debt include:

Excessive dividend payments

Leaves fewer assets to service debt

Underinvestment

Investment in high-risk projects may not be beneficial to debt holders as they have a fixed claim

Asset substitution

Claim dilution

The organisation may take on additional debt, with new debtholders competing with original debtholders for repayment

Manager–lender agency relationships

19

To avoid higher interest costs managers have incentives to show they are acting in a way that is not detrimental to lenders

Managers enter into debt covenants with lenders

Manager–lender agency relationships

20

Management: Want to satisfy shareholders and pay out high level of dividends

Lenders: Excessive dividend payments could lead to reduction in asset base securing debt

Solution: Covenants that restrain dividend policy and dividend payout as a function of profits

21

Excessive dividend payments

Managers may not want to invest in positive net present value projects, if projects would lead to increased funds being available to lenders

Lenders: In the case of bankruptcy any funds from these projects would go to creditors, rather than shareholders

Solution: covenants restricting investment opportunities of the firm; working capital ratios

22

Underinvestment

Management has incentives to invest in high risk assets or projects, as it may result in higher returns

Lenders do not want managers to invest in assets or projects of a higher risk level than agreed

Solution: debt contracts restricting investment opportunities; debt to tangible assets ratios

23

Asset substitution

Managers: may want to take on additional debt (of a higher priority)

Lenders: Additional debt increases risk that firms will not pay pack debt

Solution: leverage covenants (ratio of total liabilities to total tangible assets); interest coverage, current ratio constraints

24

Claim dilution

Accounting information forms one of the major components of both manager remuneration and lending contracts

For managers accounting information plays two roles in the contracting process:

Bonding: To write the terms of managerial contracts

Monitoring: To determine performance against the terms of the contracts and consequently the amount of bonus and other pay components managers will receive

Lenders look to regular financial updates to ensure companies are maintaining the terms of their covenants

Role of accounting information in reducing agency problems

25

Accountants use judgement to make a range of accounting decisions on a daily basis

Examples include:

Whether to expense or capitalise costs

What accounting estimates to use

What, where and how to disclose information

PAT (by Watts & Zimmerman, 1978, 1986) offers explanations of managers’ and accountants’ accounting choices

Using PAT to understand accounting choices

26

Not possible to write complete contracts, so managers are assumed to opportunistically act to maximise own wealth

Based on the ‘rational economic person’ assumption

Known as ex post perspective

Considers opportunistic actions after contracts have been put in place

Managers make accounting choices which:

Increase managerial compensation  bonus hypothesis

Avoid defaulting on debt repayments  debt hypothesis

Decrease political cost  political cost hypothesis

27

Managerial opportunistic behaviour

Agency contracts can explain managerial accounting choices:

Managers and accountants, acting in self interest, are likely to ensure their own bonuses are maximised and the entity is not at risk of breaching debt contracts

The political cost hypotheses suggests that there are times entities, for political reasons, will actively reduce their reported profits

Accounting estimates

28

Three key hypotheses frequently used in PAT literature to explain and predict support or opposition to an accounting method:

Bonus plan hypothesis

Debt hypothesis

Political cost hypothesis

Research assumes managers will act opportunistically when selecting methods

29

Key hypotheses underlying the opportunistic perspective

Managers of firms with bonus plans are more likely to use accounting methods that increase current period income

Also called management compensation hypothesis

Action increases the present value of bonuses paid to management

30

Bonus plan hypothesis

Incentives to manipulate accounting numbers

Rewarding managers on the basis of accounting profits may induce them to manipulate accounting numbers

Will affect their rewards

Bonuses based on profits cause short-term rather than long-term focus

May affect investment in positive NPV projects if returns not expected to be consistent

31

Bonus plan hypothesis

Remuneration can be tied to:

Profits of the firm

Sales of the firm

Return on assets

All based on output from the accounting system

May also be rewarded in line with market price of the firm’s shares

32

Bonus schemes

May be more appropriate to remunerate managers in terms of market value

Methods include:

Cash bonus based on share price increases

Shares

Options to shares

33

Market-based bonus schemes

Managers have incentives to increase the value of the firm

Problems include:

Share price also affected by factors beyond the control of managers, e.g., general market movements

Only senior managers likely to have a significant impact on share value

With share options potential for manipulation both around grant dates and exercise dates

34

Market-based bonus schemes

The higher the firm’s debt/equity ratio, the more likely managers use accounting methods that increase current period income

Also called debt/equity hypothesis

The higher the debt/equity ratio, the closer the firm is to the constraints in debt covenants

Covenant violation results in costs of technical default

35

Debt hypothesis

In the absence of safeguards to protect the interests of debtholders, it is assumed they will require the firm to pay higher costs of interest to compensate

If firms contract not to pay excess dividends, take on high levels of debt or invest in risky projects, then they can attract debt at lower cost

36

Use of debt contracts

Ex post, the incentive to manipulate numbers increases as the constraints approach violation

Managers found to manipulate accounting accruals in the years before and the year after violation of a debt agreement

37

Debt contracts: Manager’s incentive to manipulate

Large firms rather than small firms are more likely to use accounting choices that reduce current period reported profits

Size is a proxy variable for political attention

Reduction of reported income is hypothesised to reduce the possibility that people will argue that the organisation is exploiting other parties

38

Political cost hypothesis

Costs resulting from political attention from government, lobby groups etc.

Commonly directed at larger firms

Indication of market power

May result in increased taxes, increased wage claims, product boycotts etc.

Firms likely to adopt accounting methods to reduce profits to lower political scrutiny

39

Political costs

Politicians know that highly profitable companies could be unpopular with members of constituency

Politicians could win votes by taking actions against the companies

Argue that in public interest even though in own interest

May rely on reported profits to justify actions

Provides incentives for firms to reduce reported profits

40

Actions of politicians

PAT would hold that:

Managers on compensation contracts which have bonuses tied to a current measure of entity performance would prefer to capitalise costs  manage earnings upwards

Entities with lending agreements with a leverage covenant, would prefer to capitalise costs  manage earnings upwards

Entities in the public eye would prefer to expense costs  manage earnings downwards

Example: Expensing versus capitalising costs

41

Summary: Manager – shareholder/ debtholder relationship in PAT

42

Agency theory originates in economics

Agency theory has been very influential in accounting research

Assumptions about accounting policy choice (PAT)

Informs corporate governance mechanisms

43

Summary

Accounting information plays an important role in the design of contracts between management and shareholders, management and debt holders, and the organisation and society  PAT accounting policy choice for opportunistic reasons

44

Summary

Key assumptions of agency theory:

Human behaviour: Self-interested utility maximisation (rational, self-interested, and risk averse)

Relationship between the firm and its environment/society: Firm is a nexus of contracts

45

However …

What if managers are irrational/emotional and their behaviour conforms to social norms and rules?

What if managers are not inherently self-interested, but the incentive contracts foster self-interested behaviour? (Roberts, 2004)

46

Human behaviour

What if the firm is an integral part of society?

What is organisational practices can be explained by conformity to social/industry norms?

47

Environment

image1.jpeg

image2.emf

oleObject1.bin