essay
UNIVERSITY OF GLOUCESTERSHIRE
Business School
Cultural Issues in Management 2014-2015
|
1. Module code and title |
BM6102 Cultural Issues in Management
|
|
2. Module tutor |
Colin Simpson [email protected]
|
|
3. Tutor with responsibility for this Assessment |
This is your first point of contact. |
|
4. (Element number), Weighting, Type and Size of Assessment
|
002: 60% Coursework: Standard (1500 words or equivalent)
You will be penalised according to the Academic Regulations for Taught Provision if you exceed the size limit. |
|
5. Submission deadline
|
19th Jan 2015
Your attention is drawn to the penalties for late submission; see Academic Regulations for Taught Provision
|
|
6. Arrangements for submission |
· You are advised to submit work electronically by midday (British local time) to ensure that technical support is available should you encounter any issues with the electronic submission process. · The maximum size for an individual file to be uploaded is 5MB. You should use the following convention for naming your file: 'Bloggs_J_ s0123456_XX101_A1' (for example, Joe Bloggs –student number s0123456 – submitting a file for XX101 assessment task 1). You are also advised to add this information to the header section of your submitted document. · All files must be submitted as Word documents. · Information about electronic submission, including a set of Frequently Asked Questions, is available at https://infonet.glos.ac.uk/departments/adu/ema/Pages/emastudents.aspx · Enter the following text: “BM6102 assignment 2” in the 'Please enter the subject of your assignment' box.
|
|
7. Date and location for return of work |
Efeedback will be provided by 16th Feb 2015
|
|
8. Disabled students
|
Alternative assessment arrangements may be made, where appropriate, for disabled students. However, these will only be implemented upon the advice of the Disability Advisor. Disabled students wishing to be considered for alternative assessment arrangements must give notification of the disability (with evidence) to the Disability Advisor by the published deadlines.
|
|
9. University Regulations for Assessment
|
All assessments are subject to the Academic Regulations for Taught Provision. These include regulations relating to Errors of Attribution and Assessment Offences. In exercising their judgement, Examiners may penalise any work where the standard of English, numeracy or presentation adversely affects the quality of the work, or where the work submitted exceeds the published size or time limits, or where the work fails to follow normal academic conventions for acknowledging sources.
See endnote |
10. The requirements for the assessment
Using the same organisation as in your first assignment, write a report for the Human Resources department outlining what you consider to be the most important elements of IHR and giving recommendations as to how these elements could be effectively incorporated into their cultural training programmes. 1500 words+/-
11. Assessment criteria
This assessment seeks to assess the following:
· Your ability to locate and engage with academic materials
· Your ability to present a critical account of academic literature
· Your ability to relate academic materials to lecture content
· Your ability to apply content to real organisations
0 – 20%: Students will fail this assignment if they do not attempt to answer the question in clear English.
20-29%: An attempt is made to answer the question, but the work does not refer explicitly to concepts or theoretical frameworks discussed on this module.
30-39%: To achieve a mark in this band, students must have followed the instructions in the assignment brief, but the work may contain substantial errors and/or present a poor level of written English. Concepts and theoretical frameworks from this module are mentioned, but there is little evidence that they have been understood.
40-49%: To achieve a pass mark for this assignment students are required to produce a report which properly address the issues outlined in the assignment brief. Quotations should be attributed clearly using the Harvard referencing format. Marks will be lost for errors of attribution, poor language or incoherence.
50-59%: Higher marks will be awarded for well-structured work which demonstrates a clear understanding (through detailed analysis) of the various matters covered by the cultural briefing.
60-69%: Higher marks will be awarded for logical consistency, elegant argumentation and a high standard of presentation.
70+: Higher marks will be awarded for work which makes exceptionally well justified recommendations with reference to readings and cases studied on this module. At this level, a critically reflective perspective should be evident, for example, by showing how best practice is based on learning from some of the experiences of companies discussed in this module.
85+: Marks in this bracket will be awarded for outstanding quality of presentation and content.
12. Special instructions
Your submission should be written in a report format (1500 words).
· Use the same organisation as in paper 001.
· Your briefing might include but not be limited to the following issues: styles of management, the creation of cross-cultural teams, attracting & recruiting employees, training employees for expatriate assignments, national negotiating styles and training employees for the challenges of cross-cultural management, etc.
· Your recommendations should be clearly supported by references to academic literature
Endnote
Careful referencing of sources is vital when making use of the work of others. You are expected to employ the referencing conventions recommended in the Course. These conventions apply to information taken from internet sources, as well as books, journals and lectures. If you are unsure of the way to reference properly, seek advice from a member of staff before you submit the assessment. These are some of the points you should check before submitting your work:
· are all direct quotations, from both primary and secondary sources, suitably acknowledged (placed in quotation marks or indented)?
· have you provided full details of the source of the quotation, according to the referencing convention used in the Course?
· have you acknowledged the source of ideas not your own, even if you are not quoting directly from the source?
· have you avoided close paraphrase from sources? (Check that you are not presenting other people’s words or phrasing as if they are your own.)
· if you have worked closely with others in preparing for this assessment, is the material you are presenting sufficiently your own?
· http://insight.glos.ac.uk/departments/lis/resources/Documents/Harvard_quickref_09-10.pdf
C:\FASQC\Templates etc\Module Guide Template\EXAMPLE Module Guide.docx
C:\FASQC\Templates etc\Module Guide Template\EXAMPLE Module Guide.docx Page 3 of 7