ENG 315 Assignment 2.2- Tonisk Only

Points: 150

Assignment 2.2: Justification Report – Part 2

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Research the two (2) alternatives (i.e. possible solutions) that you’ve identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Record bibliographic information during research.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e. possible solutions) that you’ve identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Did not submit or incompletely recorded bibliographic information during research.

Insufficiently researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e. possible solutions) that you’ve identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section.Insufficientlyrecorded bibliographic information during research.

Partially researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e. possible solutions) that you’ve identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Partiallyrecorded bibliographic information during research.

Satisfactorily researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e. possible solutions) that you’ve identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section.Satisfactorilyrecorded bibliographic information during research.

Thoroughly researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e. possible solutions) that you’ve identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section.Thoroughlyrecorded bibliographic information during research.

2. Use what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.

Insufficiently usedwhat you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.

Partially usedwhat you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.

Satisfactorily used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.

Thoroughly used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.

3. Organize the assignment by your criteria. Explain in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Next, explain how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely organized the assignment by your criteria. Did not submit or incompletely explained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Did not submit or incompletely explained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.

Insufficiently organized the assignment by your criteria.Insufficientlyexplained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion.Insufficientlyexplained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.

Partially organized the assignment by your criteria.Partiallyexplained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion.Partiallyexplained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.

Satisfactorily organized the assignment by your criteria.Satisfactorilyexplained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion.Satisfactorilyexplained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.

Thoroughly organized the assignment by your criteria.Thoroughlyexplained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion.Thoroughlyexplained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.

4. Briefly summarize in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternativessection.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternativessection.

Insufficiently summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from theEvaluation of Alternativessection.

Partially summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternativessection.

Satisfactorily summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternativessection.

Thoroughly summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternativessection.

5. Include a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.

Insufficiently Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.

Partially Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.

Satisfactorily Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.

Thoroughly Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.

6. 4 References

Weight: 5%

No references provided.

Insufficiently included the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Partially included the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Satisfactorily included the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Thoroughly included required number of references; all references high quality choices.

7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements.

Weight: 25%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present