solutions pro paper

OTL540 Critical Thinking Rubric - Module 3

Meets Expectation Approaches Expectation

Below Expectation

Limited Evidence

Content, Research, and Analysis 21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points Requirements All required

components of the Training Design Template were present and included adequate detail, including: • Couse goals • Learning modules

and objectives • Learning resources • Learning activities • Discussion

question(s) • Self-assessment

opportunities • Graded

assignments

The Training Design Template was missing one component or one component did not include enough detail.

The Training Design Template was missing two components or two components did not include enough detail.

The Training Design Template was missing three or more components or three or more components did not include enough detail.

17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points Content Demonstrates strong

or adequate knowledge of the ADDIE design phase presented in the module; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

Failed to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points Sources Cites and integrates

two credible sources as specified in description.

Cites and integrates one credible source as specified in description.

Cites and integrates sources but each lacks credibility or a clear application to the assignment.

Cites and integrates no sources.

OTL540 Critical Thinking Rubric - Module 3 Mechanics and Writing 9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points Demonstrates proper use of APA style

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than one significant error.

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than two to three significant errors.

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with four to five significant errors.

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with more than five significant errors.

Total points possible = 75