Labor relation

MGT 441 Project Paper Guidelines

Instructions: You will complete an in-depth analysis of a current labor event in one of the following countries: China, Hong Kong, France, England/UK, Germany, or Mexico. Pick a single specific topic of labor relations to evaluate, such as strikes, formation, impasse resolution, etc. Pick one of the listed countries to investigate how the chosen labor relations topic is complied with or handled in that country. Research the Internet for 3-5 reputable sources regarding how the issue in the comparison country is handled. Reference the textbook and any chosen additional outside research sources as to how the chosen topic is handled in the United States prepare a comparison between the United States and the chosen alternate country regarding that aspect of labor relations; for instance, a comparison of how negotiation impasse in labor relations bargaining is handled in China compared to the United States. Comparative graphs are encouraged. Also, you are required to integrate the SLU core value of community by discussing it within the context of your paper. Your paper will be in APA style and in Microsoft Word (.doc or.docx) or rich text format (.rtf), and it will be 5-7 pages in length not including a title page or reference page and any graphics chosen. You must include references to articles or news events discussed as well as at least three additional references to include the text. Refer to the rubric on the next page for grading criteria. Your Project Paper must be completed and submitted to the Dropbox no later than Sunday 11:59 PM EST/EDT of Module 7. (This Dropbox basket is linked to Turnitin.)

Rubric: Name: ___________________________________________ Date: _______________________ Students will complete the assignment with attention to the following criteria: Rating Scale Exemplary: Corresponds to an A- to A (90-100%)

Proficient: Corresponds to B- to B+ (80-89%) Basic: Corresponds to C- to C+ (70-79%) Novice: Corresponds to D to D+ (60-69%) Not Attempted: Corresponds to an F (0-59%)

Elements

Criteria

Score (pts)

Not Attempted (Criterion is missing or

not in evidence)

Novice (does not meet expectations; performance is substandard)

Basic (works towards meeting

expectations; performance needs improvement)

Proficient (meets expectations;

performance is satisfactory)

Exemplary (exceeds expectations;

performance is outstanding)

Substance of Content 30%

Content lacking any substance. No key points are addressed 0 – 17.9 pts

Content has little-to-no substance. One or two key points are addressed 18.0 – 20.9 pts

Content has limited substance. Some key points are addressed 21.0 – 23.9 pts

Content is substantive. Most key points are addressed

24.0 – 26.9 pts

Content is very thorough and substantive. All key points are addressed 27.0 – 30 pts

___/30

Development, & Logical flow of ideas from one section to

another 20%

No evidence of logical flow or organization 0 – 11.9 pts

Little evidence of logical flow. Organization is demonstrated only to a slight degree 12.0 – 13.9 pts

Content is partially developed to a logical degree. Basic organization is demonstrated 14.0 – 15.9 pts

Content is developed in a logical sequence. Proficient organization is demonstrated. 16.0 – 17.9 pts

Content is developed in a very logical sequence. Exceptional organization is demonstrated 18.0 – 20 pts

___/20

Integration of SLU Core Value of Community

20%

No mention of core value 0 – 11.9 pts

Some mention of, but no integration of core value 12.0 – 13.9 pts

Some mention of and limited integration of core value 14.0 – 15.9 pts

Satisfactory integration of core value 16.0 – 17.9 pts

Excellent and thorough integration of core value 18.0 – 20 pts

___/20

Writing Mechanics & Formatting

30%

Does not demonstrate proper use of grammar, punctuation, organization, vocabulary, and spelling. 0 – 8.9 pts

Demonstrates limited use of grammar, punctuation, organization, vocabulary, and spelling.

9.0 – 10.4 pts

Demonstrates basic use of grammar, punctuation, organization, vocabulary, and spelling. 10.5 – 11.9 pts

Demonstrates proficient use of grammar, punctuation, organization, vocabulary, and spelling. 12.0 – 13.4 pts

Demonstrates exemplary use of grammar, punctuation, organization, vocabulary, and spelling. 13.5 – 15 pts

___/15

___/15

No evidence of a response 0 – 8.9 pts

Does not include APA formatting for citations, references, and headings. 9.0 – 10.4 pts

Attempts APA formatting for citations, references, and headings, but has many errors. 10.5 – 11.9 pts

Demonstrates APA formatting for citations, references, and headings, but has some errors. 12.0 – 13.4 pts

Demonstrates correct APA formatting for citations, references, and headings. 13.5 – 15 pts

_____/100 points

Comments/Feedback: