ISFM Trends and Practical Application in Information Systems Management
CAPSTONE LESSONS LEARNED
An important aspect of learning and retaining significant lessons learned is reflecting on, capturing and documenting those lessons. Learning comes through reflection, so take some time to think about the topics listed below.
Assignment
The deliverable is a Word document that addresses the following:
1. Your learning
· New concepts or skills you learned in this class – briefly summarized
· Review the Course Outcomes and determine whether these have been met for you, commenting on each one and how well prepared you feel you are to do each of the outcomes “in the real world”
2. Teamwork
· What you learned about team work – the good, the bad and the ugly
· What went well and why
· What did not go well and why
· An assessment of how your team performed
· How you could improve your own team work, or what you wish you had done differently
· What you could do to improve the outcome of future teams you participate in, or what you wish the team had done differently
· Other lessons learned about team and group work
3. Business Case evaluation
· Which of the teams’ projects you assess to be the best and why. This will have no effect on the grading of the projects, but is designed to help you assess what makes a good business case and an effective team.
Grading
Your “Capstone Lessons Learned” will be graded based on coverage of the topics listed above and the quality and depth of your reflective analysis, with a lesser emphasis on grammar, format, etc.
GRADING RUBRIC:
|
Criteria |
90-100% Far Above Standards |
80-89% Above Standards |
70-79% Meets Standards |
60-69% Below Standards |
< 60% Well Below Standards |
Possible Points |
|
Coverage of topics |
9-10 Points
The lessons learned document thoroughly covers each of the assigned topics. |
8 Points
The lessons learned document covers each of the assigned topics completely. |
7 Points
The lessons learned document covers each of the assigned topics. |
6 Points
The lessons learned does not cover all assigned topics. |
0-5 Points
No assigned topics are covered. |
10
|
|
Analysis |
72-80 Points
Each topic is addressed in sufficient depth to demonstrate sophisticated and reflective analysis and critical thinking. |
64-71 Points
Each topic is addressed in sufficient depth to demonstrate reflective analysis and critical thinking. |
56-63 Points
Analysis is adequate to explain topics and demonstrates reflective analysis and critical thinking. |
48-55 Points
Analysis is adequate or some topics may be lacking in sufficient depth to demonstrate reflective analysis and critical thinking. |
0-47 Point
No analysis is provided, or little effort is demonstrated. |
80 |
|
Format |
9-10 Points
Submission reflects effective organization and sophisticated writing; follows instructions provided; uses correct structure, grammar, and spelling; presented in a professional format using Word; any references used are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style. |
8 Points
Submission reflects effective organization and clear writing; follows instructions provided; uses correct structure, grammar, and spelling; presented in a professional format using Word; any references used are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style. |
7 Points
Submission is adequately organized; follows instructions provided; contains few errors in structure, grammar, and spelling; presented using Word; any references used are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style. |
6 Points
Submission may not be well organized, and/or does not follow instructions provided; and/or contains multiple grammar and/or spelling errors; and/or is not in Word; and/or does not follow APA style for references and citations. |
Document is extremely poorly written and does not convey the information. |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL Points Possible |
100 |
June 28, 2014