Operation managemnt

profileNAFASAUSA
navigating_security_in_the_cloud.pdf

www.pwc.com/security

Navigating security in the cloud

Advisory Services

Security

Cloud computing is rapidly moving into the mainstream. The benefits are undeniable, but look at whether your security needs are met.

The heart of the matter ........................................................................................................ 1

An in-depth discussion ....................................................................................................... 2

What this means for your business ................................................................................... 10

Contacts .............................................................................................................................. 11

Table of contents

1

The heart of the matter

Cloud computing has proved it can deliver lower IT costs, diminished infrastructure

complexity, and enhanced flexibility. As the technology advances into the mainstream,

organizations are finding that it also can spur innovation by lowering the financial

barriers to creating new products and services.

Consider, for instance, a global pharmaceutical company. To rapidly investigate and

develop new products, this drugmaker needed to quickly spin up computing burst

capacity to run data – and processor-intensive algorithms for modeling, simulations, and

visualizations.

After thoughtful consideration, the pharmaceutical company deployed select R&D

environments to multiple cloud providers. The result? The cloud’s on-demand, high-

performance computing capabilities have enabled the company to rapidly deploy new test

environments, which has dramatically reduced the cycle time from idea to execution. For

instance, the company can provision a 64-machine cluster computer and complete a

sequence set in 20 minutes – rather than 12 weeks – at a cost of less than $7. Rapid

delivery of new computing environments has helped this pharmaceutical company’s

scientists make quick decisions on drug research and has significantly lowered the cost of

innovation.

The drugmaker’s experience illustrates a newfound power of cloud computing: A strategic

ability to drive business growth, rather than simply delivering efficient IT services at a

lower cost.

As the function of cloud computing expands, so does the need for effective security. Chief

Information Security Officers (CISOs) understand that, while security for cloud

computing is no different than security controls for any IT environment, the stakes can be

perilously higher. This is because the possibilities of data loss, data leakage, service

downtime, regulatory constraints, and risk of intellectual property theft are amplified in

the cloud model.

Accordingly, significant security hurdles must be cleared before a business implements

cloud computing. Organizations must first carefully assess which of its applications and

data are appropriate to move to a cloud environment. The company also must

strenuously evaluate the capabilities of any potential cloud services provider, including

factors such as data security and privacy, compliance, availability, and scalability. At the

same time, it is important to consider the portability of data and applications to ensure

that organizations can move to a new provider should an existing vendor fail to deliver

agreed-upon service levels.

As cloud computing matures, organizations are beginning to understand that its benefits

extend beyond lower IT costs and higher operating efficiencies. But without careful

planning and consideration of market concerns, these gains can be overshadowed by

risks.

2

An in-depth discussion

Demand for cloud computing services has been fueled by the lingering effects of the

global recession, which forced many organizations to trim costs while meeting increased

customer demands. While this “do more with less” mandate remains a priority for most

companies, many chief executives have turned their focus to growth – and to cloud

computing.

Today, business leaders recognize that

the cloud presents a powerful new

opportunity to drive business growth

while meeting the challenges of cost

containment. Its elastic architecture

can spur innovation by lowering the

financial barrier to trying new ideas and

speeding the time to market for new

products and services. Some

companies, in fact, are using the cloud

model to create new lines of business by

partnering with external providers.

Given these benefits, it isn’t surprising

that cloud computing is evolving from

experimental to mainstream. PwC’s

2012 Global State of Information

Security Survey of more than 9,600

security and IT leaders found that four

out of 10 (41%) respondents said their

business already uses cloud services.

Adoption of the cloud is expected to

skyrocket during this decade: Forrester

Research forecasts that the global

market for cloud computing services

will soar from $40.7 billion in 2011 to more than $241 billion in 2020.1

One reason for this growth spike is the continuous maturity of cloud computing suppliers

and trust of cloud service consumers. Tentative early implementations of cloud services

have given way to large-scale deployments of business functions such as customer

relationship management (CRM), talent management, payroll, and enterprise

communications and collaboration.

Early implementations of cloud computing proved that the cloud’s pay-as-you-go

structure can trim IT spending and boost agility. It also allows a business to take

1 Forrester Research, Inc., Sizing the Cloud, April 2011

2%

47%

69%

33%

Do not know

Infrastructure as a Service

Software as a Service

Platform as a Services

Saas leads cloud deployments 41% of respondents to PwC’s 2012 Global

State of Information Security Survey say they have deployed some form of cloud computing. Most (69%) use Saas.

3

advantage of up-to-the-minute technologies without prohibitive up-front investments in

hardware and software.

The cloud model can save money by recapturing the lost value of underutilized hardware.

Infrastructure resources often sit idle

in most organizations: PCs and servers,

for instance, are used at only 10% of

their processing capacity, while

network storage is utilized at 50%

capacity.

With cloud services, hardware and

applications are used (and paid for) on

demand. The service provider can scale

or add capacity on the fly to adjust to

fluctuations in demand. As noted with

the pharmaceutical company above,

R&D computing resources can be

deployed in a matter of minutes; the

business need not install and configure

new hardware or software.

The cloud model, if executed properly,

also provides built-in redundancy with

no single point of failure. Service level

agreements (SLAs) that formally define

expectations for issues such as

availability, reliability, and

performance can provide flexibility

while decreasing downtime. Cloud

computing also can enable in-network

redundancy with automated recovery

to help eliminate disaster recovery

risks and costs.

The cloud model offers another critical

step toward IT agility: full customer

self-service. This enables businesses to

provision, manage, and terminate

services without involving the service

provider. The result? Speedy, efficient

management of IT services and

functions.

Finally, we are seeing new cloud

solutions that empower employees to

collaborate across departmental

What’s in a cloud? A definition

Despite maturation of the industry, a precise definition of cloud computing remains somewhat elusive. To clarify, we will use the description published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The institute defines cloud computing as a model for enabling convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction.

Cloud solutions are typically marketed and described based on the type of services they deliver. Three of the most common offerings are:

• Software as a service (SaaS): The consumer employs a web browser to access a provider’s applications running on a cloud infrastructure. (Examples: NetSuite, Salesforce.com, SuccessFactors)

• Platform as a service (PaaS): The consumer deploys applications on a cloud provider’s infrastructure but has no control over the underlying network or servers. (Examples: Google App Engine, Microsoft Windows Azure, DotCloud)

• Infrastructure as a service (IaaS): The consumer provisions resources on the provider’s infrastructure and can control operating systems, data, and applications – but not the underlying infrastructure. (Examples: Amazon.com EC2, Joyent, Rackspace.)

Cloud computing is commonly delineated by deployment model or service model. Today three deployment models are dominant:

• Public: A public cloud infrastructure is available to individual consumers or businesses.

• Private: A private cloud is operated solely for an organization and can be managed by the organization or a third-party company, on site or off site.

• Hybrid: A hybrid cloud comprises a mix of public and private cloud infrastructures that are discrete entities but are integrated to allow interoperability of data and applications.

4

boundaries, which can improve knowledge sharing and efficiency in completing projects,

and ultimately boost innovation.

The realities and risks of the cloud Any organization considering a move to the cloud must understand both the inherent

shortcomings and strengths of cloud computing to reap its full potential and value.

Among CISOs, threats to data security and privacy have always been the dark side of the

cloud. Yet as organizations adopt cloud computing, many are finding that security

delivered by service providers meets or beats their needs. In fact, PwC’s 2012 Global State

of Information Security Survey found that 54% of companies that have implemented

cloud computing report the technology has actually improved their security posture.

Advanced security capabilities implemented by service providers have persuaded

corporations, non-profit organizations, and governments to entrust cloud service vendors

with a widening array of data and applications.

There is perhaps no better indicator of this newfound trust than the US government’s

adoption of cloud-based solutions for several cabinet-level agencies, including the

Department of Homeland Security, which is pursuing both public and private cloud

solutions. In discussing their plans for cloud computing, government officials cite the cost

savings of up to 10% and fast scalability of the cloud model, but they also tout the

enhanced security of the cloud. 2

At the same time, standards organizations are focusing on creating cloud security

guidelines. The NIST and the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA), for example, have published

new guidance and standards for cloud implementations.

Despite these advances, security leaders are most concerned about data privacy in the

cloud. Our 2012 Global State of Information Security Survey found that 32% of

respondents believe the greatest security risk is an uncertain ability to enforce the cloud

provider security policies. Another worry, cited by 11% of respondents, is that data may be

stored on servers shared with other companies. Because these servers can span multiple

geographies, an approach known as multi-tenancy, sensitive information could be

governed by multiple – and sometimes conflicting – jurisdictions.

CISOs also are well aware that the threat landscape today is unparalleled, with

increasingly targeted – and effective – attacks perpetrated by sophisticated, patient

intruders. The most serious of these threats originate from organized crime groups and

nation states that have clandestinely launched a new generation of complex advanced

persistent threats (APTs). At the same time, a growing movement of “hacktivists”

representing loosely organized groups like Anonymous and LulzSec are also preying upon

corporations and governments that run afoul of their political and social convictions.

2 Testimony of Richard A. Spires, Chief Information Officer, before the House Committee on Homeland Security Subcommittee, October 6, 2011

5

Due to their sheer size, cloud-based service providers are tempting targets. Cyber

criminals who gain access to a cloud data center can potentially steal millions of customer

records, as well as valuable intellectual property and trade secrets. And because cloud

providers often employ a multi-country infrastructure with servers and employees

scattered across continents, the potential points of vulnerability are multiplied.

And it’s not just hackers that keep security leaders awake at night. Employees of cloud

providers, such as privileged system administrators and other “super users,” may view or

leak sensitive information, potentially damaging a customer’s security posture and

incurring costly reputational harm.

Similarly, insiders at a cloud consumer can unwittingly expose the organization to the

same kinds of risk. Often, line of business managers purchase cloud services without the

approval of IT or security leaders. These managers may mean well, but they are typically

unaware of – and do not adhere to – security policies.

Another concern has been availability and reliability of services, since outages can lead to

operational downtime that result in lost revenue or a blemished reputation. It’s a hazard

that even the most respected cloud providers have occasionally failed to avoid.

Data classification and data-handling practices employed by cloud providers also concern

CISOs. Indeed, in several incidents, hackers have guessed user passwords to gain access

to confidential documents stored in the cloud and then forwarded those documents to

third parties. In other cases, cloud service providers simply lost customer data.

Another area of concern is data storage practices. The cloud model enables data to

bounce swiftly around the world on leased servers in far-flung geographic locations. This

can be enormously complicated for organizations that must comply with regulatory and

privacy regulations mandating where information can be stored, processed, or accessed.

A German company with data residing in the United States, for instance, is subject to

both US and German privacy and security laws and regulations.

The right data and applications for the cloud Top-tier cloud service providers have implemented critical controls and deployed

technologies to defend against these evolving threats. As cloud security continues to

mature, their efforts have gained the trust of security leaders and C-suite officers.

Nonetheless, any cloud implementation must be approached with great caution and

strenuous assessment. Organizations must evaluate their current infrastructure to

determine which sensitive data and applications should – and should not – be sent to the

cloud.

PwC believes that moving non-differentiating business function to the cloud would incur

minimum risk to the organization. This would include, for example, human resources,

payroll, accounting, and CRM, as well as hosted applications such as e-mail and web

conferencing.

6

Mission-critical data and intellectual property, however, should remain within the

locked-down confines of the enterprise. Similarly, regulated data like credit card

information and healthcare records should be sent to the cloud only if the cloud supplier

has security controls that match or surpass those required by the organization and its

regulators. It is imperative to remember that the business, and not the cloud services

provider, is ultimately responsible for security and ownership of this data.

When developing a business case to send data or applications to the cloud, the business-

unit leader should work with IT and security personnel to determine what data and

applications are appropriate for cloud computing. It also will be necessary to factor in the

costs of working with IT and security teams to perform initial and on-going assessments.

Organizations should develop a flexible, adaptable framework to manage emerging

governance and compliance issues. CISOs should delineate risk thresholds by working

with the service provider to create common controls that define who is responsible for

risk, as well as which party owns responsibility for data in transit and data at rest.

Before an enterprise moves data to the cloud, CISOs must determine whether personally

identifiable information will be involved and whether international regulatory laws

regarding export or transport controls are a concern. To that end, the business must know

what data are subject to regulations such as those included in the Health Insurance

Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Payment Card

International Data Security Standard (PCI DSS), and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

For data that may be subject to audit, the business must ensure that the cloud service

provider has the technical capability to identify where, when, and how data are used. PCI

auditors, for instance, will want to know where data is located, where it has been, and

whether it has been accessed without record. HIPAA auditors, on the other hand, will

require a firewall that doesn’t allow outsiders to make application programming interface

(API) calls to their compute and storage systems, among other requirements.

Assessing the cloud provider’s capabilities Once the CIO and business leaders determine which services and data to send to the

cloud, the CISO must implement the proper controls. Together, IT and security

executives will then evaluate cloud service providers and their security capabilities,

understand any gaps in protections, and, finally, select a provider.

Today there is no standard attestation method or control framework for cloud computing,

nor is there a one-size-fits-all implementation strategy; deployment will be unique to

each individual business. To gain confidence in a potential provider, a business should

perform due diligence using an accepted security control framework; engaging an

independent adviser to help with this assessment is advisable for many organizations.

Another option that is gaining favor among cloud consumers is the use of a cloud broker.

A cloud broker can help IT and security leaders negotiate the relationship with cloud

providers and manage the use, performance, and delivery of cloud services. In addition to

7

helping organizations obtain and customize services, cloud brokers can also help tailor

security capabilities.

Whether using a broker or approaching the cloud independently, the following controls

are critical:

Contractual agreements: You own the data, so determine what rights and

recourse you have for security breaches or incidents. Because you have no control

over the cloud provider’s infrastructure, SLAs, contract requirements, and provider

documentation play a more important role than in traditional IT environments.

Access controls: The cloud provider should prove that it has implemented and

enforces administrative controls to limit employee and partner/supply chain access

to your information. It also should adequately investigate the background of

employees who will have access to data.

Certification and third-party audits: Verify that the provider has some form of

accepted third-party review of security (Statement on Standards for Attestation

Engagements 16 or ISO 27001 certification, for instance). If possible, seek

independent reviews of their facilities and operations. (See sidebar.)

Compliance requirements: Determine whether the supplier meets your

compliance needs. A critical factor will be the geographic locations of the provider’s

servers; be aware of laws that impact your data in any country in which it may reside.

Availability, reliability, and resilience: Enact agreements on measurable

availability and reliability service levels. Understand your options if the provider

does not meet agreed-upon levels.

Backup and recovery: In the event of disaster, document recovery requirements

are in writing; understand a provider’s capabilities before you engage it.

Decommissioning: Agree that data will be securely deleted once it is no longer

needed. Also make certain that virtual machines or processes are securely

decommissioned.

Portability: Determine whether you can easily move data and applications to

another cloud provider or migrate data and applications back to an on-premises

environment, if necessary. Before selecting a cloud provider, make sure that it does

not use specialized or proprietary technologies that would create vendor lock-in.

In addition, organizations should implement additional data security controls (such as

information rights management and data leakage prevention) to ensure that sensitive

data is not inadvertently moved to the cloud. Businesses also should update their incident

response program to address cloud incidents, and ensure that vendor agreements require

cloud providers to work with its customers during incidents.

8

An in-depth “secure the cloud” assessment The next step is to perform a comprehensive risk-based assessment of the cloud

environment. This overall security evaluation should include factors such as access

management, security standards, information handling, patch management, and event

monitoring and investigations.

The goal is to identify gaps in security protections offered by cloud providers and

determine the most effective means to mitigate the risk to your data, including

customizing cloud services to your needs or extending internal security governance

measures to the cloud environment. A secondary objective is to understand potential

ways data can be compromised and the

likelihood that it will happen.

When assessing cloud service suppliers, you

should apply company-specific risk ratings to

the evaluation. In doing so, pay particularly

close attention to how well a supplier will be

able to follow the letter of your security

policies. We believe that the best model is one

in which all outsourced data are encrypted

both in transit and in storage.

A “secure the cloud” approach should

encompass the following:

Security: The assessment of information

security should include, at a minimum,

data encryption, data storage location,

segregation, risk management, user

access, systems management, and

incident response.

• Privacy: Privacy can be assessed

using the generally accepted privacy

principles audit framework published by

the American Institute of Certified Public

Accountants/Canadian Institute of

Chartered Accountants. Organizations

should also use the privacy guidance that

is appropriate to their industry, such as

the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act or the

Health Insurance Portability and

Accountability Act.

A new standard for independent assessments

Independent certification of cloud supplier capabilities is an uncertain undertaking because a comprehensive framework to measure cloud suppliers’ capabilities does not yet exist.

Typically, cloud providers offer self- or third-party assessment using independent control frameworks like SAS 70 Type 2 reports. The SAS 70 auditing statement has been widely used to certify cloud providers, although it was not designed for this purpose.

SAS 70 has been replaced by the Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements 16 (SSAE 16). Despite minor differences, neither extends beyond controls relevant to financial reporting.

Other assessment options include the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) and ISO 27001. These standards focus primarily on traditional security issues, however, and do not include cloud concerns such as SLAs and multi-tenancy.

The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) has released a new standard for assessment of cloud service providers. The AICPA’s Service Organization Controls (SOC) reports create an attestation standard designed to address broad control considerations, including security, privacy, availability, confidentiality, and processing integrity. SOC reports allow third-party auditors to report on operational and compliance controls that are relevant to cloud services.

9

Scalability: Scalability is assessed by due diligence on aspects such as load testing,

stress testing, and forecast growth.

Metering: Metering can be assessed by revenue-recognition testing as well as due

diligence on the integrity and security of metering systems.

Availability: Availability can be measured by investigating resilience of the

architectural components and reviews of data recovery and information retrieval

aspects.

Data leakage: The likelihood of unauthorized disclosure of data can be

examined by a risk assessment that specifically evaluates data-leakage

vulnerabilities.

While businesses have no single official framework for attestation of cloud providers, the

US government has developed an authorization framework as part of its Cloud First

initiative. The framework, known as the Federal Risk and Authorization Management

Program (FedRAMP), provides a standardized approach to security assessment,

authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud products and services

This unified certification program was designed to achieve consistent security

authorizations using agreed-upon standards and accredited third-party assessment

organizations. All new cloud service providers must comply with this framework, which is

largely based on existing FISMA controls. Cloud vendors that are already doing business

with government agencies must attain FedRAMP compliance within two years.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has primary responsibility for the

FedRAMP initiative. A Joint Authorization Board, which comprises CIOs from the DHS,

the Department of Defense, and the General Services Administration, reviews assessment

results conducted by third-party organizations and grants authorization to service

providers. Once authorized, a cloud service provider is recognized as meeting federal

security requirements and can be employed by other agencies without an additional

assessment. This “approve once and use many” approach is designed to help government

agencies quickly and cost-effectively assess and engage providers.

FedRAMP illustrates the US government’s commitment to accelerate the adoption of

cloud computing. Ultimately, FedRAMP will also increase confidence in the security and

privacy of data stored on the cloud.

10

What this means for your business

Cloud computing can transform the way you do business. Like any transformation,

however, a successful cloud strategy requires a new mind-set – and new tools – to help

ensure that security meets your specific needs.

If you haven’t developed a cloud strategy, now is the time to start. Yet we urge you to

include security controls and periodic security assessments in your strategy.

Implementation of a cloud solution demands a thorough analysis of your business needs,

expected benefits, risks, and the capabilities of the cloud service provider. We believe this

assessment is best undertaken with the assistance of a trusted partner with a strong

strategic and technical vision. That is where we can help.

PwC can help you build data protection capabilities that align with the shifting cloud

environment. We can perform a comprehensive “secure the cloud” assessment to match

your company’s needs with a service provider’s offerings. Our team of specialists can help

identify a service provider that is trustworthy, mature, and capable of handling your

sensitive data and production applications.

With cloud computing, data security is a particularly critical issue that requires highly

skilled guidance in planning and implementation. PwC is a recognized, trusted leader in

security consulting with global expertise in the full range of data protection, privacy, and

compliance solutions.

The benefits of cloud computing are undeniable. We believe it’s time to get started on a

new strategic path. One that stretches to the clouds.

11

Contacts

To have a deeper conversation on cloud computing security or on any of the topics

mentioned, please contact:

Gary Loveland

Principal, National Security Leader

[email protected]

John Hunt

Principal, Washington

[email protected]

Brad Bauch

Principal, Houston

[email protected]

Jerry Lewis

Principal, Dallas

[email protected]

Rik Boren

Partner, St. Louis

[email protected]

Mark Lobel

Principal, New York

[email protected]

Kevin Campbell

Partner, Atlanta

[email protected]

Sloane Menkes

Principal, Washington

[email protected]

Michael Compton

Principal, Detroit

[email protected]

Joe Nocera

Principal, Chicago

[email protected]

Shawn Connors

Principal, New York

[email protected]

Chris O’Hara

Principal, San Jose

[email protected]

Scott Evoy

Principal, Boston

[email protected]

Fred Rica

Principal, New York

[email protected]

Joe Greene

Principal, Minneapolis

[email protected]

Sohail Siddiqi

Principal, San Jose

[email protected]

Peter Harries

Principal, Phoenix

[email protected]

Andy Toner

Principal, New York

[email protected]

This content is for general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional advisors.

© 2012 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the United States member firm, and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.