Operation managemnt
www.pwc.com/security
Navigating security in the cloud
Advisory Services
Security
Cloud computing is rapidly moving into the mainstream. The benefits are undeniable, but look at whether your security needs are met.
The heart of the matter ........................................................................................................ 1
An in-depth discussion ....................................................................................................... 2
What this means for your business ................................................................................... 10
Contacts .............................................................................................................................. 11
Table of contents
1
The heart of the matter
Cloud computing has proved it can deliver lower IT costs, diminished infrastructure
complexity, and enhanced flexibility. As the technology advances into the mainstream,
organizations are finding that it also can spur innovation by lowering the financial
barriers to creating new products and services.
Consider, for instance, a global pharmaceutical company. To rapidly investigate and
develop new products, this drugmaker needed to quickly spin up computing burst
capacity to run data – and processor-intensive algorithms for modeling, simulations, and
visualizations.
After thoughtful consideration, the pharmaceutical company deployed select R&D
environments to multiple cloud providers. The result? The cloud’s on-demand, high-
performance computing capabilities have enabled the company to rapidly deploy new test
environments, which has dramatically reduced the cycle time from idea to execution. For
instance, the company can provision a 64-machine cluster computer and complete a
sequence set in 20 minutes – rather than 12 weeks – at a cost of less than $7. Rapid
delivery of new computing environments has helped this pharmaceutical company’s
scientists make quick decisions on drug research and has significantly lowered the cost of
innovation.
The drugmaker’s experience illustrates a newfound power of cloud computing: A strategic
ability to drive business growth, rather than simply delivering efficient IT services at a
lower cost.
As the function of cloud computing expands, so does the need for effective security. Chief
Information Security Officers (CISOs) understand that, while security for cloud
computing is no different than security controls for any IT environment, the stakes can be
perilously higher. This is because the possibilities of data loss, data leakage, service
downtime, regulatory constraints, and risk of intellectual property theft are amplified in
the cloud model.
Accordingly, significant security hurdles must be cleared before a business implements
cloud computing. Organizations must first carefully assess which of its applications and
data are appropriate to move to a cloud environment. The company also must
strenuously evaluate the capabilities of any potential cloud services provider, including
factors such as data security and privacy, compliance, availability, and scalability. At the
same time, it is important to consider the portability of data and applications to ensure
that organizations can move to a new provider should an existing vendor fail to deliver
agreed-upon service levels.
As cloud computing matures, organizations are beginning to understand that its benefits
extend beyond lower IT costs and higher operating efficiencies. But without careful
planning and consideration of market concerns, these gains can be overshadowed by
risks.
2
An in-depth discussion
Demand for cloud computing services has been fueled by the lingering effects of the
global recession, which forced many organizations to trim costs while meeting increased
customer demands. While this “do more with less” mandate remains a priority for most
companies, many chief executives have turned their focus to growth – and to cloud
computing.
Today, business leaders recognize that
the cloud presents a powerful new
opportunity to drive business growth
while meeting the challenges of cost
containment. Its elastic architecture
can spur innovation by lowering the
financial barrier to trying new ideas and
speeding the time to market for new
products and services. Some
companies, in fact, are using the cloud
model to create new lines of business by
partnering with external providers.
Given these benefits, it isn’t surprising
that cloud computing is evolving from
experimental to mainstream. PwC’s
2012 Global State of Information
Security Survey of more than 9,600
security and IT leaders found that four
out of 10 (41%) respondents said their
business already uses cloud services.
Adoption of the cloud is expected to
skyrocket during this decade: Forrester
Research forecasts that the global
market for cloud computing services
will soar from $40.7 billion in 2011 to more than $241 billion in 2020.1
One reason for this growth spike is the continuous maturity of cloud computing suppliers
and trust of cloud service consumers. Tentative early implementations of cloud services
have given way to large-scale deployments of business functions such as customer
relationship management (CRM), talent management, payroll, and enterprise
communications and collaboration.
Early implementations of cloud computing proved that the cloud’s pay-as-you-go
structure can trim IT spending and boost agility. It also allows a business to take
1 Forrester Research, Inc., Sizing the Cloud, April 2011
2%
47%
69%
33%
Do not know
Infrastructure as a Service
Software as a Service
Platform as a Services
Saas leads cloud deployments 41% of respondents to PwC’s 2012 Global
State of Information Security Survey say they have deployed some form of cloud computing. Most (69%) use Saas.
3
advantage of up-to-the-minute technologies without prohibitive up-front investments in
hardware and software.
The cloud model can save money by recapturing the lost value of underutilized hardware.
Infrastructure resources often sit idle
in most organizations: PCs and servers,
for instance, are used at only 10% of
their processing capacity, while
network storage is utilized at 50%
capacity.
With cloud services, hardware and
applications are used (and paid for) on
demand. The service provider can scale
or add capacity on the fly to adjust to
fluctuations in demand. As noted with
the pharmaceutical company above,
R&D computing resources can be
deployed in a matter of minutes; the
business need not install and configure
new hardware or software.
The cloud model, if executed properly,
also provides built-in redundancy with
no single point of failure. Service level
agreements (SLAs) that formally define
expectations for issues such as
availability, reliability, and
performance can provide flexibility
while decreasing downtime. Cloud
computing also can enable in-network
redundancy with automated recovery
to help eliminate disaster recovery
risks and costs.
The cloud model offers another critical
step toward IT agility: full customer
self-service. This enables businesses to
provision, manage, and terminate
services without involving the service
provider. The result? Speedy, efficient
management of IT services and
functions.
Finally, we are seeing new cloud
solutions that empower employees to
collaborate across departmental
What’s in a cloud? A definition
Despite maturation of the industry, a precise definition of cloud computing remains somewhat elusive. To clarify, we will use the description published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The institute defines cloud computing as a model for enabling convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction.
Cloud solutions are typically marketed and described based on the type of services they deliver. Three of the most common offerings are:
• Software as a service (SaaS): The consumer employs a web browser to access a provider’s applications running on a cloud infrastructure. (Examples: NetSuite, Salesforce.com, SuccessFactors)
• Platform as a service (PaaS): The consumer deploys applications on a cloud provider’s infrastructure but has no control over the underlying network or servers. (Examples: Google App Engine, Microsoft Windows Azure, DotCloud)
• Infrastructure as a service (IaaS): The consumer provisions resources on the provider’s infrastructure and can control operating systems, data, and applications – but not the underlying infrastructure. (Examples: Amazon.com EC2, Joyent, Rackspace.)
Cloud computing is commonly delineated by deployment model or service model. Today three deployment models are dominant:
• Public: A public cloud infrastructure is available to individual consumers or businesses.
• Private: A private cloud is operated solely for an organization and can be managed by the organization or a third-party company, on site or off site.
• Hybrid: A hybrid cloud comprises a mix of public and private cloud infrastructures that are discrete entities but are integrated to allow interoperability of data and applications.
4
boundaries, which can improve knowledge sharing and efficiency in completing projects,
and ultimately boost innovation.
The realities and risks of the cloud Any organization considering a move to the cloud must understand both the inherent
shortcomings and strengths of cloud computing to reap its full potential and value.
Among CISOs, threats to data security and privacy have always been the dark side of the
cloud. Yet as organizations adopt cloud computing, many are finding that security
delivered by service providers meets or beats their needs. In fact, PwC’s 2012 Global State
of Information Security Survey found that 54% of companies that have implemented
cloud computing report the technology has actually improved their security posture.
Advanced security capabilities implemented by service providers have persuaded
corporations, non-profit organizations, and governments to entrust cloud service vendors
with a widening array of data and applications.
There is perhaps no better indicator of this newfound trust than the US government’s
adoption of cloud-based solutions for several cabinet-level agencies, including the
Department of Homeland Security, which is pursuing both public and private cloud
solutions. In discussing their plans for cloud computing, government officials cite the cost
savings of up to 10% and fast scalability of the cloud model, but they also tout the
enhanced security of the cloud. 2
At the same time, standards organizations are focusing on creating cloud security
guidelines. The NIST and the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA), for example, have published
new guidance and standards for cloud implementations.
Despite these advances, security leaders are most concerned about data privacy in the
cloud. Our 2012 Global State of Information Security Survey found that 32% of
respondents believe the greatest security risk is an uncertain ability to enforce the cloud
provider security policies. Another worry, cited by 11% of respondents, is that data may be
stored on servers shared with other companies. Because these servers can span multiple
geographies, an approach known as multi-tenancy, sensitive information could be
governed by multiple – and sometimes conflicting – jurisdictions.
CISOs also are well aware that the threat landscape today is unparalleled, with
increasingly targeted – and effective – attacks perpetrated by sophisticated, patient
intruders. The most serious of these threats originate from organized crime groups and
nation states that have clandestinely launched a new generation of complex advanced
persistent threats (APTs). At the same time, a growing movement of “hacktivists”
representing loosely organized groups like Anonymous and LulzSec are also preying upon
corporations and governments that run afoul of their political and social convictions.
2 Testimony of Richard A. Spires, Chief Information Officer, before the House Committee on Homeland Security Subcommittee, October 6, 2011
5
Due to their sheer size, cloud-based service providers are tempting targets. Cyber
criminals who gain access to a cloud data center can potentially steal millions of customer
records, as well as valuable intellectual property and trade secrets. And because cloud
providers often employ a multi-country infrastructure with servers and employees
scattered across continents, the potential points of vulnerability are multiplied.
And it’s not just hackers that keep security leaders awake at night. Employees of cloud
providers, such as privileged system administrators and other “super users,” may view or
leak sensitive information, potentially damaging a customer’s security posture and
incurring costly reputational harm.
Similarly, insiders at a cloud consumer can unwittingly expose the organization to the
same kinds of risk. Often, line of business managers purchase cloud services without the
approval of IT or security leaders. These managers may mean well, but they are typically
unaware of – and do not adhere to – security policies.
Another concern has been availability and reliability of services, since outages can lead to
operational downtime that result in lost revenue or a blemished reputation. It’s a hazard
that even the most respected cloud providers have occasionally failed to avoid.
Data classification and data-handling practices employed by cloud providers also concern
CISOs. Indeed, in several incidents, hackers have guessed user passwords to gain access
to confidential documents stored in the cloud and then forwarded those documents to
third parties. In other cases, cloud service providers simply lost customer data.
Another area of concern is data storage practices. The cloud model enables data to
bounce swiftly around the world on leased servers in far-flung geographic locations. This
can be enormously complicated for organizations that must comply with regulatory and
privacy regulations mandating where information can be stored, processed, or accessed.
A German company with data residing in the United States, for instance, is subject to
both US and German privacy and security laws and regulations.
The right data and applications for the cloud Top-tier cloud service providers have implemented critical controls and deployed
technologies to defend against these evolving threats. As cloud security continues to
mature, their efforts have gained the trust of security leaders and C-suite officers.
Nonetheless, any cloud implementation must be approached with great caution and
strenuous assessment. Organizations must evaluate their current infrastructure to
determine which sensitive data and applications should – and should not – be sent to the
cloud.
PwC believes that moving non-differentiating business function to the cloud would incur
minimum risk to the organization. This would include, for example, human resources,
payroll, accounting, and CRM, as well as hosted applications such as e-mail and web
conferencing.
6
Mission-critical data and intellectual property, however, should remain within the
locked-down confines of the enterprise. Similarly, regulated data like credit card
information and healthcare records should be sent to the cloud only if the cloud supplier
has security controls that match or surpass those required by the organization and its
regulators. It is imperative to remember that the business, and not the cloud services
provider, is ultimately responsible for security and ownership of this data.
When developing a business case to send data or applications to the cloud, the business-
unit leader should work with IT and security personnel to determine what data and
applications are appropriate for cloud computing. It also will be necessary to factor in the
costs of working with IT and security teams to perform initial and on-going assessments.
Organizations should develop a flexible, adaptable framework to manage emerging
governance and compliance issues. CISOs should delineate risk thresholds by working
with the service provider to create common controls that define who is responsible for
risk, as well as which party owns responsibility for data in transit and data at rest.
Before an enterprise moves data to the cloud, CISOs must determine whether personally
identifiable information will be involved and whether international regulatory laws
regarding export or transport controls are a concern. To that end, the business must know
what data are subject to regulations such as those included in the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Payment Card
International Data Security Standard (PCI DSS), and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
For data that may be subject to audit, the business must ensure that the cloud service
provider has the technical capability to identify where, when, and how data are used. PCI
auditors, for instance, will want to know where data is located, where it has been, and
whether it has been accessed without record. HIPAA auditors, on the other hand, will
require a firewall that doesn’t allow outsiders to make application programming interface
(API) calls to their compute and storage systems, among other requirements.
Assessing the cloud provider’s capabilities Once the CIO and business leaders determine which services and data to send to the
cloud, the CISO must implement the proper controls. Together, IT and security
executives will then evaluate cloud service providers and their security capabilities,
understand any gaps in protections, and, finally, select a provider.
Today there is no standard attestation method or control framework for cloud computing,
nor is there a one-size-fits-all implementation strategy; deployment will be unique to
each individual business. To gain confidence in a potential provider, a business should
perform due diligence using an accepted security control framework; engaging an
independent adviser to help with this assessment is advisable for many organizations.
Another option that is gaining favor among cloud consumers is the use of a cloud broker.
A cloud broker can help IT and security leaders negotiate the relationship with cloud
providers and manage the use, performance, and delivery of cloud services. In addition to
7
helping organizations obtain and customize services, cloud brokers can also help tailor
security capabilities.
Whether using a broker or approaching the cloud independently, the following controls
are critical:
Contractual agreements: You own the data, so determine what rights and
recourse you have for security breaches or incidents. Because you have no control
over the cloud provider’s infrastructure, SLAs, contract requirements, and provider
documentation play a more important role than in traditional IT environments.
Access controls: The cloud provider should prove that it has implemented and
enforces administrative controls to limit employee and partner/supply chain access
to your information. It also should adequately investigate the background of
employees who will have access to data.
Certification and third-party audits: Verify that the provider has some form of
accepted third-party review of security (Statement on Standards for Attestation
Engagements 16 or ISO 27001 certification, for instance). If possible, seek
independent reviews of their facilities and operations. (See sidebar.)
Compliance requirements: Determine whether the supplier meets your
compliance needs. A critical factor will be the geographic locations of the provider’s
servers; be aware of laws that impact your data in any country in which it may reside.
Availability, reliability, and resilience: Enact agreements on measurable
availability and reliability service levels. Understand your options if the provider
does not meet agreed-upon levels.
Backup and recovery: In the event of disaster, document recovery requirements
are in writing; understand a provider’s capabilities before you engage it.
Decommissioning: Agree that data will be securely deleted once it is no longer
needed. Also make certain that virtual machines or processes are securely
decommissioned.
Portability: Determine whether you can easily move data and applications to
another cloud provider or migrate data and applications back to an on-premises
environment, if necessary. Before selecting a cloud provider, make sure that it does
not use specialized or proprietary technologies that would create vendor lock-in.
In addition, organizations should implement additional data security controls (such as
information rights management and data leakage prevention) to ensure that sensitive
data is not inadvertently moved to the cloud. Businesses also should update their incident
response program to address cloud incidents, and ensure that vendor agreements require
cloud providers to work with its customers during incidents.
8
An in-depth “secure the cloud” assessment The next step is to perform a comprehensive risk-based assessment of the cloud
environment. This overall security evaluation should include factors such as access
management, security standards, information handling, patch management, and event
monitoring and investigations.
The goal is to identify gaps in security protections offered by cloud providers and
determine the most effective means to mitigate the risk to your data, including
customizing cloud services to your needs or extending internal security governance
measures to the cloud environment. A secondary objective is to understand potential
ways data can be compromised and the
likelihood that it will happen.
When assessing cloud service suppliers, you
should apply company-specific risk ratings to
the evaluation. In doing so, pay particularly
close attention to how well a supplier will be
able to follow the letter of your security
policies. We believe that the best model is one
in which all outsourced data are encrypted
both in transit and in storage.
A “secure the cloud” approach should
encompass the following:
Security: The assessment of information
security should include, at a minimum,
data encryption, data storage location,
segregation, risk management, user
access, systems management, and
incident response.
• Privacy: Privacy can be assessed
using the generally accepted privacy
principles audit framework published by
the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants/Canadian Institute of
Chartered Accountants. Organizations
should also use the privacy guidance that
is appropriate to their industry, such as
the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act or the
Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act.
A new standard for independent assessments
Independent certification of cloud supplier capabilities is an uncertain undertaking because a comprehensive framework to measure cloud suppliers’ capabilities does not yet exist.
Typically, cloud providers offer self- or third-party assessment using independent control frameworks like SAS 70 Type 2 reports. The SAS 70 auditing statement has been widely used to certify cloud providers, although it was not designed for this purpose.
SAS 70 has been replaced by the Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements 16 (SSAE 16). Despite minor differences, neither extends beyond controls relevant to financial reporting.
Other assessment options include the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) and ISO 27001. These standards focus primarily on traditional security issues, however, and do not include cloud concerns such as SLAs and multi-tenancy.
The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) has released a new standard for assessment of cloud service providers. The AICPA’s Service Organization Controls (SOC) reports create an attestation standard designed to address broad control considerations, including security, privacy, availability, confidentiality, and processing integrity. SOC reports allow third-party auditors to report on operational and compliance controls that are relevant to cloud services.
9
Scalability: Scalability is assessed by due diligence on aspects such as load testing,
stress testing, and forecast growth.
Metering: Metering can be assessed by revenue-recognition testing as well as due
diligence on the integrity and security of metering systems.
Availability: Availability can be measured by investigating resilience of the
architectural components and reviews of data recovery and information retrieval
aspects.
Data leakage: The likelihood of unauthorized disclosure of data can be
examined by a risk assessment that specifically evaluates data-leakage
vulnerabilities.
While businesses have no single official framework for attestation of cloud providers, the
US government has developed an authorization framework as part of its Cloud First
initiative. The framework, known as the Federal Risk and Authorization Management
Program (FedRAMP), provides a standardized approach to security assessment,
authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud products and services
This unified certification program was designed to achieve consistent security
authorizations using agreed-upon standards and accredited third-party assessment
organizations. All new cloud service providers must comply with this framework, which is
largely based on existing FISMA controls. Cloud vendors that are already doing business
with government agencies must attain FedRAMP compliance within two years.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has primary responsibility for the
FedRAMP initiative. A Joint Authorization Board, which comprises CIOs from the DHS,
the Department of Defense, and the General Services Administration, reviews assessment
results conducted by third-party organizations and grants authorization to service
providers. Once authorized, a cloud service provider is recognized as meeting federal
security requirements and can be employed by other agencies without an additional
assessment. This “approve once and use many” approach is designed to help government
agencies quickly and cost-effectively assess and engage providers.
FedRAMP illustrates the US government’s commitment to accelerate the adoption of
cloud computing. Ultimately, FedRAMP will also increase confidence in the security and
privacy of data stored on the cloud.
10
What this means for your business
Cloud computing can transform the way you do business. Like any transformation,
however, a successful cloud strategy requires a new mind-set – and new tools – to help
ensure that security meets your specific needs.
If you haven’t developed a cloud strategy, now is the time to start. Yet we urge you to
include security controls and periodic security assessments in your strategy.
Implementation of a cloud solution demands a thorough analysis of your business needs,
expected benefits, risks, and the capabilities of the cloud service provider. We believe this
assessment is best undertaken with the assistance of a trusted partner with a strong
strategic and technical vision. That is where we can help.
PwC can help you build data protection capabilities that align with the shifting cloud
environment. We can perform a comprehensive “secure the cloud” assessment to match
your company’s needs with a service provider’s offerings. Our team of specialists can help
identify a service provider that is trustworthy, mature, and capable of handling your
sensitive data and production applications.
With cloud computing, data security is a particularly critical issue that requires highly
skilled guidance in planning and implementation. PwC is a recognized, trusted leader in
security consulting with global expertise in the full range of data protection, privacy, and
compliance solutions.
The benefits of cloud computing are undeniable. We believe it’s time to get started on a
new strategic path. One that stretches to the clouds.
11
Contacts
To have a deeper conversation on cloud computing security or on any of the topics
mentioned, please contact:
Gary Loveland
Principal, National Security Leader
John Hunt
Principal, Washington
Brad Bauch
Principal, Houston
Jerry Lewis
Principal, Dallas
Rik Boren
Partner, St. Louis
Mark Lobel
Principal, New York
Kevin Campbell
Partner, Atlanta
Sloane Menkes
Principal, Washington
Michael Compton
Principal, Detroit
Joe Nocera
Principal, Chicago
Shawn Connors
Principal, New York
Chris O’Hara
Principal, San Jose
Scott Evoy
Principal, Boston
Fred Rica
Principal, New York
Joe Greene
Principal, Minneapolis
Sohail Siddiqi
Principal, San Jose
Peter Harries
Principal, Phoenix
Andy Toner
Principal, New York
This content is for general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional advisors.
© 2012 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the United States member firm, and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.