Voc Dev.
lsutigers27
e.docxCreate a matrix or chart that demonstrates 8-10 teaching strategies for vocabulary development. Include:
1. The vocabulary strategies
2. Informal assessments to measure learning for each strategy
3. How to differentiate for ELL or special needs students
Three to give peer-reviewed articles to support your content.
Vocabulary Development
|
|
1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less Than Satisfactory 65.00% |
3 Satisfactory 75.00% |
4 Good 85.00% |
5 Excellent 100.00% |
|
|
100.0 %Vocabulary Development Rubric |
|
|||||
|
45.0 % Chart/Matrix |
Chart/matrix is missing the strategies and assessments for teaching vocabulary. |
Chart/matrix contains some of the strategies and assessments for teaching vocabulary. Strategies and assessments are incomplete. |
Chart/matrix contains the strategies and assessments for teaching vocabulary. Strategies and assessments are complete and coherent. |
Chart/matrix contains the strategies and assessments for teaching vocabulary. Strategies and assessments are complete, clear, coherent, and cohesive. |
Chart/matrix contains the strategies and assessments for teaching vocabulary. Strategies and assessments are complete, clear, coherent, and cohesive. Higher-order thinking is evident. |
|
|
25.0 % Technical Requirements: Number of teaching strategies and assessments |
Fewer than six strategies and related assessments are present. |
Six or seven strategies and assessments are present. |
At least eight strategies and assessments are present. |
Nine or ten strategies and assessments are present. |
More than 10 strategies and assessments are present. |
|
|
10.0 % Research |
No outside sources are used to support the assignment. |
Few outside sources are used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. |
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality, and/or timeliness. |
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
|
|
5.0 % Presentation |
The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. |
The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. |
The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. |
The presentation is good. The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. |
The work is well-presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. |
|
|
10.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language and/or word choice are present. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech. |
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
|
5.0 % Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and references page listing and formatting are appropriate to assignment and style) |
No references page and no citations are included. |
References page is present, but citations are inconsistently used. |
References page is included. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. |
References page is inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. |
In-text citations and a references page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of errors. |
|
|
100 % Total Weightage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
