chart

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%

2 Less Than Satisfactory 65.00%

3 Satisfactory 75.00%

4 Good 85.00%

5 Excellent 100.00%

80.0 %Content

65.0 % Chart/Matrix

Chart is missing or incomplete and omits most of the assessments used to measure children's reading abilities.

Chart is missing or incomplete and omits some of the assessments used to measure children's reading abilities; fewer than five assessments are compared.

Chart is complete and contains the required assessments used to measure children's reading abilities. Five assessments are compared.

Chart is clear and coherent and contains the required assessments used to measure children's reading abilities. Five assessments are compared.

Chart is clear and coherent and contains the required assessments used to measure children's reading abilities. The assessments elicit higher-order thinking. Five assessments are compared.

15.0 % Research

No outside sources are used to support the assignment.

Few outside sources are used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.

Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality, and/or timeliness.

Research is timely and relevant and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.

Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.

5.0 %Originality

5.0 % Originality

The work is an extensive collection and rehash of other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions. There is no evidence of new thought or inventiveness.

The work is a minimal collection or rehash of other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions. There is no evidence of new thought.

The product shows evidence of originality. While based on other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions, the work does offer some new insights.

The product shows evidence of originality and inventiveness. While based on an extensive collection of other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions, the work extends beyond that collection to offer new insights.

The product shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon logical conclusions and sound research.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

10.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech.

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

5.0 % Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and references page listing and formatting are appropriate to assignment and style)

No references page and no citations are included.

References page is present, but citations are inconsistently used.

References page is included. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

References page is inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a references page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of errors.

100 % Total Weightage