Hygiene & Toxicology

profileblackwhite1
2014_ohse2740_eohs_management_assignment_booklet.pdf

2013  OHSE2740  EOHS  MANAGEMENT  ASSIGNMENT  BOOKLET     Page 1  

 

 

The  University  of  Newcastle   CRICOS  provider  number  00709J  

Faculty  of  Health  and  Medicine   School  of  Health  Sciences   Assignment  Booklet  

OHSE2740  –  EOHS  MANAGEMENT  –  10  units   Trimester  3  -­‐  2014  (PSB  Campus,.  Singapore)  –  UoN  Singapore     Location  of  Offices  and  Staff     Course  Coordinator   Adelle  Liebenberg  ,  School  of  Health  Sciences,    

The  University  of  Newcastle,  Australia   Tele:+  61  2  4961  6715   Email:  [email protected]  

Teaching  Staff   Yeo  Beng  Wah   Email:  [email protected]  

Singapore   Program  Queries  

Log  your  question  or  request  at  the  following  website:   http://psb-­‐academy.force.com/case/CM_LogCaseForm  

Australia   School  Office  Contact  

Ashley  Gleeson   Hunter  Building,  The  University  of  Newcastle   University  Drive,     CALLAGHAN    NSW    2308       Email:  [email protected]    

   

ASSIGNMENT  1:  ACADEMIC  ESSAY   Aims  and  Objectives   The  essay  aims  to  develop  students’  research  and  analytical  abilities.  It  also  assesses  students’  understanding   of  theory,  concepts  and  issues  articulated  within  the  course  framework.  The  essay  is  worth  30%  of  the   available  marks  for  the  course.  

Essay  Topic   Students  are  required  to  read  ahead  and  submit  an  essay  (1500  words  excluding  references)  on  below.   Students  are  expected  to  draw  on  relevant  theories  and  examples  from  organisations  or  their  own   experience.  They  can  also  devise  hypothetical  examples  if  it  helps  to  illustrate  points.  Please  refer  to  the   essay-­‐marking  guide  contained  in  this  Appendix  for  essay  criteria  details.   Compare  and  contrast  two  theories  of  motivation.  Are  financial  rewards  still  the  best  motivator  of  human   beings  at  work?   OR   “Our  behaviour  as  individuals  is  influenced  more  by  the  groups  to  which  we  belong  than  any  other  factor”.   Critically  evaluate  this  statement  and  explain  whether  or  not  you  agree  and  why?  

Essay  Requirements   General   • Use  a  12  point  font  and  double-­‐line  or  1.5  spacing.  

2013  OHSE2740  EOHS  MANAGEMENT  ASSIGNMENT  BOOKLET     Page 2  

• Provide  a  generous  margin  for  comments  and  a  word  count  at  end  of  the  essay.   • Please  submit  your  assignment  via  Turnitin  via  the  Blackboard  site  for  this  course  and  a  hard  copy  to  be  

dropped  at  PSB  collection  box.     • Number  every  page.   • If  your  lecturer  asks  for  a  hard-­‐copy,  please  do  not  use  folders  or  plastic  packets.    These  will  not  add  to  

your  marks,  they  will  be  discarded  and  are  hence  a  waste  of  your  money.   • Contain  a  list  of  references,  cited  correctly  and  consistently.    A  reference  is  a  book  or  article  that  has  

been  referred  to  in  the  essay.    DO  NOT  provide  a  bibliography  –  that  is  a  list  of  readings  which  have  not   been  referred  to  in  the  essay.  

• Information  that  is  not  vital  to  the  essay  discussion/argument  should  be  put  into  an  Appendix  at  the  end   of  the  essay.    Marks  will  be  deducted  for  irrelevant  information  –  for  example:    graphs,  tables,  pictures,   etc.  –  that  is  included  in  the  essay  body  but  which  is  not  essential  to  the  essay  but  simply  additional  or   interesting  information  which  belongs  in  an  Appendix.  

• It  is  required  that  each  essay  will  directly  source  at  least  two  journal  articles  as  references.    It  is   expected  that  students  will  expand  on  information  provided  in  the  text  and  not  simply  rehash  what  is   already  there.  

• DO  NOT  rely  on  non-­‐academic  journals/magazines,  etc.  (Eg.  Business  Review  Weekly).  Although  they   may  be  relevant  and  used  effectively  to  obtain  organisational  examples,  they  will  not  be  considered  as   part  of  your  minimum  requirement  of  two  academic  journal  articles.  

• Web  references  may  be  used  as  long  as  they  are  academic  articles  and  not,  for  example,  one   person’s/organisation’s  viewpoint.  

Results   Results  will  fall  into  one  of  five  categories:   High  Distinction  (85-­‐100%).     Excellent:  Answers  all  aspects  of  question.  Tight  sustained  arguments.  Clear  understanding  of  theory,   concepts  and  issues.  Logically  consistent  analysis  well  articulated  within  the  analytic  framework  presented  in   the  course.  Clear  identification  of  and  focus  on  the  most  critical  aspects  of  the  situation  being  analysed.   Synthesis  (if  called  for)  carefully  reflects  results  of  key  analyses  presented.  Well-­‐structured  discussion,   carefully  written,  adequately  documented,  persuasively  argued,  with  effective  selection  and  presentation  of   supporting  data.  Appropriate  reference  to  relevant  course  materials  (and  an  absence  of  references  not   clearly  relevant  to  issue  being  discussed).   Distinction  (5-­‐84%).     Answers  all  aspects  of  the  question.  Analysis  developed  within  the  analytic  framework  presented  in  the   course.  Good  identification  and  discussion  of  critical  issues.  Synthesis  (if  any)  based  on  analyses  presented.   Organisation  of  discussion  is  clear,  argument  is  persuasive,  documentation  and  supporting  data  are   appropriate  to  discussion.  Referencing  is  accurate  and  appropriate.   Credit  (65-­‐74%).     Answers  most  aspects  of  the  question.  Analysis  invokes  analytic  framework  developed  in  the  course,  but   with  some  conceptual  errors  or  shortcoming.  Critical  aspects  of  situation  are  addressed,  but  not  clearly   identified  as  such.  Synthesis  is  related  to  analyses,  but  logical  gaps  between  analysis  and  synthesis  are   evident.  Discussion  is  comprehensible  and  internally  consistent,  but  not  persuasive.  Referencing  is  adequate.   Pass  (50-­‐63%).     Adequate  structures.  Descriptive  rather  than  analytical.  Analysis  shows  limited  knowledge  of  analytical   framework  developed  in  the  course.  Limited  but  adequate  reference  and  sourcing.  Arguments  weak  but   shows  understanding  of  issues  involved.   Fail  (<  49%).       Analysis  misapplies  analytic  framework  developed  in  course  or  unrelated  to  course  framework.  Critical   aspects  of  situation  are  not  adequately  addressed  or  identified.  Synthesis  has  little  or  no  relation  to  analyses.  

2013  OHSE2740  EOHS  MANAGEMENT  ASSIGNMENT  BOOKLET     Page 3  

Discussion  is  hard  to  follow,  internally  inconsistent,  and  not  at  all  persuasive.  Shows  little  or  no  evidence  of   understanding  of  concepts  covered  in  the  course.    

2013  OHSE2740  EOHS  MANAGEMENT  ASSIGNMENT  BOOKLET     Page 4  

Assessment  Criteria   The  following  form  will  be  completed  in  detail  and  used  to  give  you  feedback  on  the  assessment  criteria.     Name:  

         

            Student  Number:

         

  Criteria Assessor Rating and Comments Mark

Introduction Overview of issues: Excellent Very Good Good Average Needs Development Poor Statement of purpose of the research: Excellent Very Good Good Average Needs Development Poor Able to hold reader interest:: Excellent Very Good Good Average Needs Development Poor

/5

Content: Demonstrates an understanding of the question requirements: Excellent Very Good Good Average Needs Development Poor Logical development of arguments: Excellent Very Good Good Average Needs Development Poor Able to critically discuss the paper theme: Excellent Very Good Good Average Needs Development Poor A clear ability to identify the implications of the literature: Excellent Very Good Good Average Needs Development Poor Use of multiple sources: Excellent Very Good Good Average Needs Development Poor Use of examples: Excellent Very Good Good Average Needs Development Poor Writer's own ideas: Excellent Very Good Good Average Needs Development Poor

/15

Conclusions Paper well-summarised: Excellent Very Good Good Average Needs Development Poor Conclusions Justified: Excellent Very Good Good Average Needs Development Poor Able to hold reader interest: Excellent Very Good Good Average Needs Development Poor

/5

Professionalism Presented in well-thought out, consistent, readable form and structure: Excellent Very Good Good Average Needs Development Poor Referencing and reference list consistent: Excellent Very Good Good Average Needs Development Poor Appropriate Length: Excellent Very Good Good Average Needs Development Poor

/5

Total

/30

General  Comments:  

2013  OHSE2740  EOHS  MANAGEMENT  ASSIGNMENT  BOOKLET     Page 5  

Assignment  2:  CASE  STUDY  REPORT   Due  Date:  Refer  to  Course  Outline  

Maximum  Length:  2500  words  

Assessment  Value:  30%  

1. Aims  &  Objectives   The  case  study  aims  to  assess  your  ability  to  systematically  analyse,  and  help  solve  a  real-­‐world  management   problem  within  a  team  environment.  Ultimately,  the  purpose  is  to  identify  the  most  critical  issues  in  the  case   and  recommend  appropriate  actions  to  deal  with  them.  Case  answers  should  integrate  a  number  of  topics   covered  throughout  the  course.   This  assignment  will  be  based  on  the  case  study  ‘24JAM’  at  pages  18  to  19.    Team  size  will  be  4-­‐5  people,   depending  on  the  number  of  students  in  the  class.    The  length  of  case  report  should  not  exceed  2500  words.    

2. Case  Study  Skills   Case  learning  demands  more  intensive  involvement  by  the  student  than  other  forms  of  learning.  It  also   requires  interaction  with  other  students  when  cases  are  studied  on  a  group  basis.  This  helps  develop  the   vital  skills  of  communication  and  perception,  and  enable  the  student  to  experience,  first  hand,  the  problems   that  may  arise  in  a  group  situation.   A  student  who  has  developed  good  case  study  skills  is  in  a  better  position  to  systematically  analyse,  and   perhaps  solve,  real-­‐world  problems.  After  all,  a  case  is  usually  based  on  an  actual  business  situation.  No   answers  are  provided.  It  is  true  that  the  same  pressures  do  not  exist  in  the  classroom  situation  as  in  the  work   place,  but  the  tutor  or  lecturer  can  make  the  situation  more  realistic  by  placing  time  constraints  on  students   or  perhaps  even  role-­‐playing  the  part  of  the  boss  who  wants  accurate  and  positive  results.   Analytical  skills  are  needed  to  extract  all  pertinent  information  from  a  case.  Such  skills  enable  the  student  to   isolate  concepts  which  can  be  applied  universally,  thus  greater  thoroughness  and  consistency  are  achieved.   If  the  student  is  systematic  in  analysing  the  case,  he  or  she  will  soon  be  able  to  make  comparisons  with  other   cases.  Acquiring  these  skills  enables  the  student  to  recognise  the  sorts  of  things  he  or  she  is  looking  for  at  the   outset,  and  to  quickly  discard  irrelevancies.  Acquisition  of  common  skills  also  improves  communication   between  students,  and  enables  them  to  work  together  better  on  a  group  basis.   Analysing  cases,  then  communicating  and  defending  one’s  conclusions  is  a  difficult  exercise,  however,  with   practice  these  skills  can  be  acquired.  

2.1  Stages  of  Studying  a  Case   Stage  1   Quickly  peruse  the  general  scenario  presented,  to  gain  a  general  impression  of  the  situation.  It  is  

often  useful,  at  this  stage,  to  underline,  highlight  or  annotate  pieces  of  information  which  may   indicate  that  problems  exist,  for  example,  a  statement  indicating  that  a  firm  is  experiencing  high   labour  turnover  or  staff  unrest.  

Stage  2   Read  the  case  again  thoroughly,  perhaps  several  times.  Look  for  evidence  which  will  enable  you   to  answer  the  questions.  

Stage  3   Plan  your  answer.  Here  are  some  useful  guidelines  for  this  stage:   • You  must  be  able  to  cite  evidence  from  the  case  to  support  your  arguments  and  

recommendations.  Evidence  may  consist  of  facts,  figures  where  relevant,  statements  made,   and  views  expressed  by  the  characters  in  the  case.  

• It  is  legitimate  to  draw  inferences  about  matters  which  are  not  explicitly  stated.  However,   you  should  always  be  able  to  justify  such  inferences.  There  may  be  a  fine  line  between   drawing  an  inference  and  engaging  in  'flights  of  fantasy'  of  your  own,  which  are  not   permissible.  Remember  in  the  'real  world'  such  inferences  should  be  confirmed  before   actions  are  taken,  perhaps  inappropriately.  

• In  your  answers,  you  should  apply  your  knowledge  of  theories,  gained  from  your  study  of   management  &  organisational  behaviour,  to  the  evidence  which  you  have  assembled.  Your   ultimate  goal  is  to  make  some  concrete  and  practical  recommendations  to  management.  

2013  OHSE2740  EOHS  MANAGEMENT  ASSIGNMENT  BOOKLET     Page 6  

Vague  conclusions,  such  as  'the  jobs  of  the  workers  have  to  be  enriched',  or  'Fred  has  to   change  his  leadership  style',  are  not  sufficient,  as  it  is  not  setting  out  a  course  of  action.  

Stage  4   Generate  your  final  answer.  While  you  may  quote  from  statements  or  opinions  expressed  in  the   case,  be  selective.  Do  not  simply  paraphrase  what  you  read  in  the  case.  This  approach  will  not   provide  a  satisfactory  answer.  Try  to  express  your  ideas  in  your  own  words,  and  to  address  the   issues  in  a  concise  and  relevant  manner.  

   

2.2  Isolating  Key  Information  and  Reading  for  Understanding   Without  oversimplifying  the  issue,  isolating  key  information  is  basically  a  matter  of  looking  for  it,  provided   you  have  done  the  necessary  preparation.  If  a  piece  of  information  does  not  relate  to  any  of  the  issues  you   are  looking  at,  then  the  information  should  be  discarded.  It  is  important  to  remember,  however,  that  in   analysing  a  case  study,  you  may  identify  different  issues  after  reading  the  case  several  times  and  often  do.   Thus,  information  that  may  not  have  related  to  the  originally  identified  issue  may  be  seen  subsequently  to   be  very  relevant.  This  is  another  reason  why  a  case  will  require  a  number  of  readings,  until  all  the  key   information  has  been  identified.   Some  cases  begin  with  relatively  long-­‐winded  description  of  the  company's  history.  Although  this   information  is  interesting  and  may  provide  some  insight  into  the  company's  values  and  past  performance,   you  should  not  fall  into  the  trap  of  spending  too  much  time  trying  to  analyse  past  information  that  may  not   be  relevant  to  the  problems  faced  by  the  company  in  the  present  environment.  The  importance  of  such   introductory  information  will,  of  course,  depend  on  the  instructions  attached  to  the  case.   In  ensuring  that  you  have  identified  the  key  issues,  it  is  often  a  useful  technique  to  try  to  state,  in  your  own   words,  what  the  problem  seems  to  be.  If  you  find  after  one  reading,  that  you  cannot  do  this,  you  may  need   another  reading.  

2.3  Appraising  and  Evaluating  Facts  and  Opinions   One  of  the  best  ways  to  appraise  facts  and  opinions  given  in  a  case  is  to  represent  them,  where  appropriate,   on  a  chart,  diagram  or  table.  For  example,  you  can  appraise  the  structure  of  an  organisation  much  more   easily  through  an  organisational  chart  than  in  a  written  description  of  the  organisation's  structure.  This   enables  the  reader  to  see  at  a  glance  the  hierarchy  of  control  in  the  organisation,  the  span  of  control  of  each   manager,  the  full  range  of  departments  in  the  organisation  and  their  interrelationships,  and  potential   problem  areas,  which  may  exist  in  the  structure.   What  happens,  however,  if  facts  and  opinions  conflict  with  each  other?  Obviously,  you  must  decide  which   one  to  accept.  Often  a  case  study  suggests  a  number  of  alternative  proposals  and  you  must  recommend  one.   In  situations  such  as  these,  it  is  often  important  to  look  back  and  see  whether  the  objectives  of  the   organisation  have  been  stated.  Where  this  is  the  case,  the  objectives  will  often  provide  the  best  guidance  as   to  which  course  you  should  adopt.     You  must  be  careful  in  appraising  facts  and  opinions.  Facts  can  be  distorted  if  they  are  not  placed  in  the   context  of  other  environmental  factors  such  as  economic  conditions,  competition,  availability  of  supplies,   and  the  strengths  and  weaknesses  of  the  market.  Furthermore,  facts  which  appear  impressive  on  the  surface   can  be  deceptive.  For  example,  the  case  may  state  that  company  X  is  proud  to  be  market  leader  with  55  per   cent  market  share  and  a  sales  growth  of  5  per  cent  in  the  past  year.  However,  what  if  the  previous  years   market  share  was  65  per  cent  and  the  industry  sales  growth  was  10  per  cent?  This  would  put  a  completely   different  perspective  on  the  company's  performance.   Opinions  expressed  by  characters  in  the  case  can  also  be  deceptive  if  they  are  not  analysed  carefully.  In   some  cases,  you  need  to  be  perceptive  and  be  able  to  determine  in  whose  interest  the  case  is  written.   Obviously,  you  should  be  wary  if  it  appears  that  the  case  writer  had  a  vested  interest  in  writing  the  case.  For   example,  a  senior  manager  would  most  likely  take  a  very  different  view  of  an  industrial  relations  issue  than  a   union  official.  

2.4  Not  Accepting  Everything  at  Face  Value   A  common  mistake  made  by  students  is  to  accept  everything  that  is  contained  in  a  case  as  gospel,  and  to   agree  with  any  conclusions  stated  by  particular  characters  in  the  case.  An  essential  step  of  studying  cases,  

2013  OHSE2740  EOHS  MANAGEMENT  ASSIGNMENT  BOOKLET     Page 7  

therefore,  is  that  you  do  not  always  accept  things  at  face  value,  but  rather  you  should  question  facts  and   statements  made  and  form  you  own  opinion  as  to  their  validity  and  the  conclusions  to  be  drawn  from  them.   Not  accepting  statements  and  opinions  expressed  in  the  case  automatically,  is  an  essential  step  to  cultivating   a  questioning  frame  of  mind.  As  has  been  suggested  above,  statements  made  by  people  portrayed  in  a  case   are  often  a  reflection  of  the  interests  of  the  area  of  their  company.    

Assessment  Criteria:  Group  Report  

Case  Study  Feedback  Sheet     Criteria   Comments   Mark   Executive  Summary:   Overview  of  background  to  the  case,  aim,   analysis  and  recommendations.  

   /3  

Problems  /  Issues:   Identification  of  key  problems/issues;  synthesis   of  issues;  linkage  between  problems/issues;   provision  of  examples  from  the  case  to  support   arguments;  justification  of  answer.  

   /7.5  

Theories  /  Concepts  /  Models:   Identification  of  relevant   theories/concepts/models  that  assist  in   understanding  the  case;  use  of  examples  or   quotes  from  the  case  that  link  with  chosen   theories.  

     /10  

Recommendations:     Recommendations  for  improvement;  rationale   for  recommendations;  demonstration  of   problem  solving  ability;  practicality  of   implementation  plan;  a  discussion  of  resources,   time,  people  responsible  to  undertake  plan  and   action.  

     /7.5  

Professionalism:   Presented  in  well-­‐thought  out,  readable  form;   structure;  consistency  between  sections;   length;  appendices.  

   /2  

Signed:     Total:      /30    

3. Format  of  the  Case  Study  Answer   Put  yourself  in  the  role  of  a  consultant  who  has  been  asked  to  make  an  initial  report  on  the  organisation.     This  means  that  you  could  put  the  solutions  and  implementation  plan  into  place  if  your  report  seems  to   adequately  address  the  problems  and  suggest  workable  solutions.  Write  the  answer  as  if  it  is  to  be  presented   to  the  organisation’s  board  of  directors  (or  equivalent).   The  Case  Study  answer  must:   • Be  submitted  via  Turnitin  accessed  through  the  Blackboard  site  for  this  course  plus  a  hard  copy  per  

group  dropped  into  the  PSB  assignment  collection  box.   • Be  typed  in  12  size  font   • Have  a  3  cm  margin  on  the  left  and  a  3  cm  margin  on  the  right     • Be  numbered  on  each  page   • Provide  proper  referencing    

2013  OHSE2740  EOHS  MANAGEMENT  ASSIGNMENT  BOOKLET     Page 8  

• Have  headings  throughout  the  report.   • Use  third  person  tenses  –  ie  ‘it  appears  that’  rather  than  “I  think/we  think”  or  “it  is  suggested”  rather  

than  “I/We  recommend”   Also   • Try  to  focus  on  the  issues  as  well  as  the  people  in  the  case.    A  lot  of  issues  are  linked  with  a  manager  but  

the  point  of  case  study  analysis  (as  with  any  ‘real’  organisation)  is  to  put  strategies  into  place  that   underpin  the  success  of  the  organisation.    

Your  report  should  contain  the  following:   • A  title  page;   • An  Executive  Summary  (1  page  maximum).  The  Executive  Summary  gives  an  overview  of  the  background,  

analysis  and  recommendations;   • An  analysis  of  the  case  in  the  context  of  the  key  Management  &  OB  issues/problems.  This  should  include  

a  justification  of  why  you  believe  these  are  important  issues  or  problems;   • A  discussion  of  related  Management  &  OB  theories,  concepts,  models  that  help  understand  the  case.  

Responses  should  briefly  outline  the  theories/concepts  chosen  and  relate  them  back  to  the  case  (ie.  why   and  how  are  they  relevant?).  Examples  or  quotes  from  the  case  should  link  well  with  the  theories   chosen;  

• Recommendations  for  improvement.  What  are  the  objectives  for  resolving  this  case?  This  discussion   should  include  a  rationale  for  your  recommendations,  and  also  how  these  recommendations  may  be   carried  out.  Relate  these  recommendations  to  your  critical  analysis.  Provide  an  implementation  plan  and   a  timeframe  for  suggested  strategies;  

• A  reference  list;   • Appendices  (if  applicable).    

4. Group  Results     Group  members  will  generally  receive  the  same  result  for  their  report.  However,  marks  may  be  altered  for   individuals  if  the  Lecturer  deems,  from  group  feedback,  that  those  individuals  have  not  made  a  concerted   effort  to  contribute  to  the  team  effort.     If  a  group  is  experiencing  problems,  each  team  member  should  submit  a  Group  Process  form  to  the  Lecturer.   This  form  is  on  the  following  two  pages.  

2013  OHSE2740  EOHS  MANAGEMENT  ASSIGNMENT  BOOKLET     Page 9  

5.  Group  Assessment  

REPORT  ON  GROUP  PROCESS  &  OUTCOME     Student  Name:   Student  No. Team:   Email. 1.  What  were  the  Group's  Rules  &  Strategies           2.  Describe  the  Group  Process  in  Terms  of:  Frequency  of  Meeting,  Dates  of  Meeting,  Medium  of  Place,   Duration,  Attendance,  Outcome           3.  Roles  Played  or  Work  Undertaken  by  Each  Member         4.  Problems  Experienced                 5.  General  Comments:  (Including  how  you  would  tackle  the  case  study  differently  next  time.)                 Signed:                 Date:    

2013  OHSE2740  EOHS  MANAGEMENT  ASSIGNMENT  BOOKLET     Page 10  

6.  Group  Case  Study:  Individual  Contributions   Note:  Allocate  percentages  based  on  your  perception  of  individual  contributions  to  the  group  effort.      

Name Percentage (%) Member  1   Member  2   Member  3   Member  4   Member  5   Member  6    

7.  Assessment  Case  and  Questions  

Case  Study  (30  Marks)  

Netflix:  Making  Movie  Magic       How  can  the  most  successful  video-­‐delivery  company  beat  its  already  unbelievable  one-­‐day  turnaround  time?   By  making  a  growing  portion  of  its  immense  catalog  available  for  instant  download.  Netflix  leverages  emerging   technologies,  superior  customer  service,  and  an  ever-­‐growing  subscriber  base  to  transform  the  traditional  video-­‐ rental  model  into  a  21st-­‐century  on-­‐demand  concept.    

The  Open  Secret  of  Success     What’s  the  most  exciting  piece  of  mail  you’ve  received  lately?  Ask  more  than  eight  million  customers  in  the   United  States,  and  they’ll  probably  reply  that  it’s  a  little  red-­‐and-­‐white  envelope  from  Netflix.  More  than  46,000   DVD  titles  are  in  transit  on  any  given  day,  requiring  the  company  to  stock  approximately  55  million  DVDs  to  keep   up  with  customer  demand.  What  accounts  for  Netflix’s  success?  CEO  Reed  Hastings  believes  the  key  to  the   sustained  growth  of  the  Los  Gatos,  a  Californian  company  is  no  secret  at  all—it  thrives  because  of  its  renowned   customer  service.    Beating  out  such  heavies  as  Amazon,  Apple,  and  Target,  Netflix  was  crowned  Number  One  in   eight  straight  e-­‐commerce  customer  satisfaction  surveys  conducted  by  ForeSee  Results.  According  to  Netflx   spokesman  Steve  Swasey,  the  company  keeps  its  top  place  by  continuously  improving  operations—both  title   selection  and  customer  convenience.  Netflix  customers  have  posted  more  than  two  billion  movie  reviews  on  its   Web  site  to  date;  an  average  customer  has  posted  about  two  hundred.  In  return,  Netflix  recommends  movies  to   customers  based  on  their  renting  habits.  About  60%  of  its  members  choose  new  rentals  based  on  these   recommendations.  To  improve  the  tool  used  to  generate  these  recommendations,  Netflix  organized  a  contest  to   gather  its  members’  ideas.  The  prize:  one  million  dollars.   Netflix  claims  that  its  members  rent  twice  as  many  movies  as  they  did  before  joining  the  service.  Given  their   recent  sales  figures,  it  comes  as  little  surprise.  At  the  end  of  the  most  recent  fiscal  year,  net  income  also  grew  6%   to  finish  at  $67  million,  with  a  21%  growth  in  revenue  that  hit  $1.2  billion,  defying  analysts’  expectations.     Netflix  recently  introduced  Instant  Viewing,  which  streams  any  of  12,000  movies  and  television  shows  to   customers’  computers.  Within  thirty  seconds  of  beginning  a  download,  customers  can  roll  the  opening  credits.   Unlike  customers  at  the  Apple’s  iTunes  Store,  Netflix  customers  can  wait  as  long  as  they  want  before  finishing  a   streamed  movie.  Best  of  all,  they  don’t  have  to  pay  extra—the  program  is  built  into  every  membership  plan.  “It’s   not  branded  at  all,”  said  Swasey.  “It’s  just  part  of  the  service.”  Since  opening  up  the  service,  Netflix  has   quadrupled  its  inventory  of  streaming  content.     Taking  things  a  step  further—and  challenging  Apple  even  more  directly—  Netflix  partnered  with  the  consumer   electronics  company  Roku  to  produce  a  palm-­‐sized  set-­‐top  box  that  allows  customers  to  view  streamed  movies  on   their  televisions  by  using  broadband  connections.  It’s  a  logical  move,  according  to  David  Cohen,  executive  vice   president  and  U.S.  director  of  digital  communications  at  Interpublic  Group’s  Universal  McCann.  “The  ability  to   have  thousands,  if  not  millions,  of  content  options  delivered  to  your  box  is  certainly  the  way  of  the  future,”  he   said.    

2013  OHSE2740  EOHS  MANAGEMENT  ASSIGNMENT  BOOKLET     Page 11  

  Some  customers  even  help  Netflix  expand  into  markets  it  has  overlooked.  A  few  small  libraries  are  quietly  using   Netflix  to  expand  their  interlibrary  loan  capabilities.  Video  stores  have  caught  on,  too.  One  discreet  Massachusetts   store  owner  claims  to  rent  ten  to  fifteen  Netflix  discs  a  month,  which  saves  him  more  than  $2,000  in  yearly   inventory  expenses.  “It’s  nice  to  be  able  to  offer  the  latest  foreign  title  that  no  one  has  heard  of,”  he  said.      

Slaying  the  Dragons     Giving  customers  what  they  want,  Netflix  has  beaten  back  competition  from  some  of  the  biggest  names  in  media.     By  allowing  customers  to  keep  DVDs  as  long  as  they  like,  Netflix  undermined  the  concept  of  late  fees,  which  had   represented  a  major  source  of  profits  for  traditional  rental  companies.  And  as  instant  viewing  continues  to  grow   in  popularity  among  Netflix  customers,  the  concept  is  not  catching  on  everywhere  —  Wal-­‐Mart  closed  the   curtains  on  its  own  movie  download  service.    

Putting  People  Up  Front     So,  what  does  the  future  hold  for  Netflix?  CEO  Reed  Hastings  makes  no  bones  about  the  business  model:     “If  one  thinks  about  Netflix  as  a  DVD  rental  business,”  he  says,  “one  is  right  to  be  scared;  if  one  thinks  of  Netflix  as   an  online  movie  service  with  multiple  different  delivery  models,  then  one’s  a  lot  less  scared.  We’re  only  now   beginning  to  deliver  the  proof  points  behind  that  second  vision.”    To  deliver  on  this  promise,  Hastings  is  now   betting  as  much  on  people  as  on  his  business  vision  and  high  technology.      

  Perks,  compensation,  and  freedom  are  mainstays  of  Netflix’s  commitment  to  hiring  and  retaining  the  best  people   in  the  industry.  When  dealing  with  competitors  such  as  Apple,  Blockbuster,  and  Amazon,  a  lot  is  on  the  line  in  the   wars  for  talent.  As  to  salaries,  Hastings  says:  “We’re  unafraid  to  pay  high.”16  And  interestingly,  pay  isn’t  linked   with  performance  in  the  sense  of  “merit.”       Salaries  are  pegged  to  job  markets  to  ensure  that  Netflix  pay  is  always  the  best  around.  If  you’re  top  talent,  you   get  top  salary  and  are  given  the  freedom  to  put  your  talents  to  work  making  Netflix’s  strategy  succeed.  But  if   you’re  something  less  than  a  top  performer,  say,  just  “average,”  there  isn’t  room  at  the  company.  “At  most  

Blockbuster  Isn’t  in  Retreat     Blockbuster  Inc.,  founded  in  1985  and  headquartered  in  Dallas,  Texas,  is  another  leading  global  provider  of  in-­‐home   movie  and  game  entertainment,  with  approximately  8,000  stores  throughout  the  Americas,  Europe,  Asia,  and   Australia.  The  company,  once  one  of  the  strongest  entertainment  brands  in  the  world,  recently  reported  worldwide   revenues  of  more  than  $5.5  billion.       Blockbuster  has  the  largest  in-­‐store  presence  of  any  company  in  the  movie  rental  business,  a  growing  online   presence,  and  the  capability—currently,  the  only  one  in  the  marketplace  to  do  so—to  integrate  the  physical   storefront  with  its  online  presence.  It  is  still  growing;  its  share  of  the  store-­‐based  rental  business  continues  as  a   company  focus,  but  Blockbuster  is  no  longer  just  a  chain  of  video  stores.  It  is  an  online  and  an  in-­‐store  retailer,  and   becoming  more  integrated  every  day.  Its  Blockbuster  Total  AccessTM  movie  rental  program  gives  online  customers   the  option  of  exchanging  their  DVDs  through  the  mail  or  returning  them  to  a  nearby  participating  Blockbuster  store   in  exchange  for  free  in-­‐store  movie  rentals.  With  this  total  access,  customers  no  longer  have  to  choose  between   renting  online  or  renting  in-­‐store,  and  they  never  have  to  be  without  a  movie.       As  the  home  entertainment  industry  has  evolved,  so,  too,  has  Blockbuster.  But  has  it  transformed  enough?   Blockbuster  is  facing  stiff  competition  from  Netflix  on  one  side  and  from  Redbox  on  the  other.  Redbox  offers  $1   DVD  rentals  for  24  hours  and  has  more  locations  than  Blockbuster’s  costly  brick  and  mortar  stores.  Named  one  of   the  “15     Companies  That  Might  Not  Survive  2009”  in  US  News,  Blockbuster  isn’t  giving  up  yet.  Instead,  it  is  inviting   consumers  to  try  its  service  for  free,  allowing  online  video  game  rentals,  and  offering  incentives  and  deals  to  drum   up  business.22     Whatever  direction  the  future  of  home  entertainment  takes,  Blockbuster  believes  it  has  the  assets  that  will  enable   the  company  to  bridge  to  the  future.  Do  the  facts  of  the  market  bear  out  such  optimism?    

 

2013  OHSE2740  EOHS  MANAGEMENT  ASSIGNMENT  BOOKLET     Page 12  

companies,”  says  Hastings,  “average  performers  get  an  average  raise.  At  Netflix  they  get  a  generous  severance   package.”     Netflix  not  only  hires  carefully  and  well,  it  offers  a  unique  and  highly  productive  work  environment  rich  in  features   that  appeal  to  today’s  high-­‐tech  and  high-­‐talent  workers.  Its  human  resource  plan  is  as  creative  as  its  business   model:  pay  higher-­‐than-­‐average  salaries;  let  employees  choose  how  much  of  their  compensation  is  paid  in  cash   and  how  much  in  stock  options;  encourage  each  employee  to  recruit  three  others  they  would  “love”  to  work  with;   let  employees  take  as  much  time  off  and  vacation  as  they  think  they  need;  limit  work  rules,  maximize  work   freedom,  and  make  everyone  responsible  for  the  choices  he  or  she  makes.       Hastings  has  a  lot  riding  on  his  human  resource  strategy.  Does  Netflix  have  the  right  vision  for  the  future?      

Discussion  Questions     1. What  performance  appraisal  method  would  you  recommend  to  make  sure  that  only  the  “best”  are  kept  on  

the  Netflix  team?       2. What  are  the  limitations  and  risks  of  Hastings’  human  resource  management  practices?       3. If  Hastings  was  on  the  board  of  a  firm  such  as  Procter  &  Gamble  or  Home  Depot,  would  his  ideas  on  human  

resource  management  work  for  them?  Why  or  why  not?       4. FURTHER  RESEARCH—Check  up  on  Hastings  and  Netflix.  How  is  the  firm  doing  right  now?  How  has  it  changed  

since  the  case  information  was  prepared?  Are  the  human  resource  management  practices  described  here  still   active  at  the  firm?  What  else  is  Netflix  doing  to  create  human  capital  for  sustained  competitive  advantage?    

2013  OHSE2740  EOHS  MANAGEMENT  ASSIGNMENT  BOOKLET     Page 13  

EXAMINATION  DETAILS   Examination  Date:  Refer  to  Course  Outline   Assessment  Value:  40%  

Allocated  Time:  2  hours   1.    Aims  and  Objectives   To  provide  an  opportunity  for  students  to  display  integrative  knowledge  of  the  course  material.  The   examination  will  also  test  students’  critical  thinking  ability  and  problem  solving  skills.  

2.    Format   This  examination  will  consist  of  two  parts:   SECTION  A   Short  Answer  Questions  (10  marks).  In  this  section  you  will  be  asked  to  answer  2  out  of  4  questions.  Each   question  is  worth  5  marks.     There  is  no  “correct”  length  of  answer-­‐  some  students  will  write  three-­‐quarters  of  an  exam  page,  and  some   will  write  two  or  three  pages  for  each  answer.  Quality  will  be  rewarded  over  quantity.     Students  should  try  to  be  critical  in  their  analysis,  and  not  just  reiterate  textbook  material.       Each  question  covers  one,  two,  or  more  topics  in  the  course.  These  areas  are  not  necessarily  the  same  as   those  covered  in  the  practice  exam  questions.   SECTION  B     Case  Study  (30  marks).  In  this  section  you  will  be  asked  to  answer  all  3  questions  in  relation  to  a  real-­‐life  case   study.  These  questions  will  be  the  same  as  those  presented  in  the  practice  exam  case  study.   This  case  study  is  an  integrative  exercise  and  is  designed  to  cover  many  topics  presented  in  the  course.  Try  to   relate  one  problem/issue  to  others.  For  example,  if  you  highlight  structure  as  an  issue,  how  does   organisational  structure  affect  communication?  (This  is  not  necessarily  going  to  be  an  issue  in  the  exam   case).   Your  exam  answer  does  not  need  a  synopsis  or  an  executive  summary.     Please  put  headings  throughout  your  answer  to  highlight  the  main  areas  discussed.  

Practice  Exam  Questions   Section  1  Short  Answer  Questions  (10  marks)   Answer  two  questions  out  of  four  questions  in  this  section.  Each  question  is  worth  5  marks.   Question  1  (5  marks):   Comment  on  the  accuracy  of  the  following  statement:  “According  to  goal  setting  theory,  performance   increases  with  the  level  of  goal  difficulty.”   Answer  Guide:     Students  should  mention  the  conditions  necessary  for  effective  goal  setting  by  managers:  one  of  these  is   “challenging  goals”.  Up  to  a  certain  point,  it  is  true  that  performance  increases  with  the  level  of  goal   difficulty.    Harder  goals  lead  to  greater  effort  and  persistence  than  easier  goals.    However,  employees  must   accept  and  preferably  be  committed  to  these  challenging  goals.  Without  goal  acceptance,  effort  declines   significantly,  resulting  in  low  performance.  (This  is  similar  to  expectancy  theory  where  the  E-­‐to-­‐P  expectancy   declines.  The  E-­‐to-­‐P  expectancy  tends  to  increase  as  employees  are  placed  in  work  environments  with   favorable  situational  factors.    In  other  words,  they  should  be  given  sufficient  time,  materials,  and  other   resources  to  accomplish  the  job  and  have  obstacles  removed  where  possible).  Examples  would  improve   student  marks  here.     Question  2  (5  marks):  

2013  OHSE2740  EOHS  MANAGEMENT  ASSIGNMENT  BOOKLET     Page 14  

The  head  of  emergency  services  in  your  city  strongly  believes  that  heterogeneous  teams  are  more  effective   than  homogeneous  teams.  The  executive  wants  to  put  this  belief  into  practice  by  frequently  rotating   ambulance  and  other  emergency  service  teams  so  that  teams  would  constantly  have  new  people  with   diverse  backgrounds  and  experiences.  This  would  be  supplemented  with  a  hiring  process  that  deliberately   selects  people  with  diverse  ethnic,  cultural,  and  educational  backgrounds.  Using  your  knowledge  of  team   dynamics,  discuss  the  merits  of  the  executive’s  actions  in  the  emergency  services  agency.   Answer  Guide:   To  answer  this  question  well,  students  should  explain  that  heterogeneous  teams  have  certain  advantages.    In   particular,  they  are  generally  more  effective  than  homogeneous  teams  on  complex  projects  and  problems   requiring  innovative  solutions.  This  is  because  people  from  different  backgrounds  see  a  problem  or   opportunity  from  different  perspectives.  Heterogeneous  team  members  also  solve  complex  problems  more   easily  because  they  usually  have  a  broader  knowledge  base.     These  attributes  may  be  beneficial  to  emergency  service  teams  to  some  extent.    However,  emergency   service  teams  might  also  suffer  if  they  are  heterogeneous  and  may  be  more  effective  when  members  are   homogeneous.  Indeed,  emergency  response  teams  may  be  more  effective  with  homogeneous  team   members  because  homogeneous  teams  tend  to  be  more  effective  on  tasks  requiring  a  high  degree  of   cooperation  and  coordination.  In  this  example,  the  constant  rotation  of  employees  through  various  teams   indicates  that  emergency  service  teams  will  continually  cycle  through  the  team  development  process  and   face  ongoing  intra-­‐group  conflict.    This  conflict  may  undermine  service  efficiency.  Emergency  services  need   to  have  high  performing  teams  (i.e.  have  reached  the  performing  stage  of  team  development)  so  that  they   coordinate  their  behaviours  smoothly.    Otherwise,  a  patient’s  life  could  be  jeopardized.   Students,  for  extra  marks,  may  also  describe  the  stages  of  team  development  Eg.  Forming.  Storming.   Norming.  Performing  and  also  describe  decision-­‐making  processes  /  models.  The  model  of  team   effectiveness  is  also  very  relevant  here.     Question  3  (5  marks):   You  want  production  employees  at  your  company  to  be  more  motivated  to  complete  their  assignments   more  efficiently.  They  are  confident  that  they  can  perform  their  jobs  more  efficiently,  and  the  rewards  you   give  employees  (pay  checks,  paid  time  off,  etc.)  are  valued  by  these  people.  Identify  the  one  element  of   expectancy  theory  that  requires  improvement  and  identify  three  possible  actions  that  would  increase   employee  motivation  through  this  element.   Answer  Guide   Students  should  give  an  overview  of  expectancy  theory.  Students  then  need  to  answer  this  question  by   identifying  the  element  of  expectancy  theory  that  requires  change.  The  incident  says  that  employees  know   they  can  perform  their  jobs  more  efficiently,  so  they  already  have  a  high  E-­‐to-­‐P  expectancy.  Moreover,   employees  value  the  rewards,  suggesting  that  the  outcomes  have  a  high  valence.  This  leaves  the  likelihood   that  employees  have  a  low  P-­‐to-­‐O  expectancy.  That  is,  they  perceive  a  low  probability  that  performing  the   job  more  efficiently  will  lead  to  desired  outcomes.   There  are  several  ways  to  increase  the  P-­‐to-­‐O  expectancy.  The  company  needs  to  measure  employee   performance  accurately  (in  this  case,  measuring  number  of  units  produced  per  hour,  or  some  other  measure   of  work  efficiency).  The  company  needs  to  tell  employees  that  certain  desirable  rewards  will  result  from   increased  work  efficiency.  P-­‐to-­‐O  expectancy  will  also  increase  if  the  company  shows  examples  of  situations   where  employees  receive  the  desired  rewards  after  they  have  performed  their  jobs  more  efficiently.   Moreover,  when  employees  receive  their  rewards,  they  should  be  told  how  these  rewards  resulted  from   past  incidents  of  work  efficiency.  Students  will  get  additional  marks  for  elaborating  on  each  of  these   techniques  and  offering  additional  examples.     Question  4  (5  marks):   Marketing  specialists  at  Budding  Beer  Co.  developed  a  new  advertising  campaign  for  summer  sales.    The  ads   were  particularly  aimed  at  sports  events  where  Budding  sold  kegs  of  beer  on  tap.  The  marketing  groups   worked  for  months  with  a  top  advertising  firm  on  the  campaign.  Their  effort  was  successful  in  terms  of  

2013  OHSE2740  EOHS  MANAGEMENT  ASSIGNMENT  BOOKLET     Page 15  

significantly  higher  demand  for  Budding’s  keg  beer  at  sports  stadiums.    However,  the  production  department   had  not  been  notified  of  the  marketing  campaign  and  was  not  prepared  for  the  increased  demand.  The   company  was  forced  to  buy  empty  kegs  at  a  premium  price.    It  also  had  to  brew  some  of  the  lower  priced   keg  beer  in  vats  that  would  have  been  used  for  higher-­‐priced  specialty  beer.    The  result  was  that  Budding   sold  more  of  the  lower-­‐priced  keg  beer  and  less  of  the  higher-­‐priced  products  that  summer.    Moreover,  the   company  could  not  initially  fill  consumer  demand  for  the  keg  beer,  resulting  in  customer  dissatisfaction.  Use   system  theory  to  explain  what  has  occurred  at  Budding  Beer  Co.   Answer  guide   This  incident  mainly  relates  to  the  open  systems  idea  that  organisations  consist  of  many  interdependent   parts.  In  larger  organisations,  subsystem  interdependence  is  so  complex  that  an  event  in  one  department   may  ripple  through  the  organisation  and  affect  other  subsystems  In  this  case,  the  marketing  group’s   advertising  campaign  had  unintended  implications  for  the  production  group.  Marketing’s  campaign   increased  demand  for  keg  beer,  which  forced  production  to  brew  more  of  the  lower-­‐priced  product  rather   than  the  higher-­‐priced  specialty  beer.  It  was  also  necessary  to  keep  up  with  demand  by  paying  premium   prices  for  empty  kegs.     Students  may  argue  that  marketing  employees  did  not  notify  the  production  group  about  its  plans.    This  may   be  a  valid  argument  in  this  incident.  However,  we  must  keep  in  mind  that  employees  engage  in  many   activities  that  have  repercussions  for  others  that  we  would  never  expect.  Moreover,  it  is  possible  that   production  employees  could  not  predict  all  of  the  implications  of  marketing’s  campaign  even  if  the   production  group  was  notified  in  advance.