Business Law

profilenaoiac
business_law_rubric_a1.docx

Points: 150

Assignment 1: Good Grocers, Inc.

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Explain whether this situation is best handled by litigation or by a particular form of alternative dispute resolution.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely explained whether this situation is best handled by litigation or by a particular form of alternative dispute resolution.

Insufficiently explained whether this situation is best handled by litigation or by a particular form of alternative dispute resolution.

Partially explained whether this situation is best handled by litigation or by a particular form of alternative dispute resolution.

Satisfactorily explained whether this situation is best handled by litigation or by a particular form of alternative dispute resolution.

Thoroughly explained whether this situation is best handled by litigation or by a particular form of alternative dispute resolution.

2. Based on how you would handle this situation, either through litigation or a particular form of alternative dispute resolution, outline the key next steps involved in seeking a resolution. Justify your response.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely outlined the key next steps involved in seeking a resolution, based on how you would handle this situation, either through litigation or a particular form of alternative dispute resolution. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response.

Insufficiently outlined the key next steps involved in seeking a resolution, based on how you would handle this situation, either through litigation or a particular form of alternative dispute resolution. Insufficiently justified your response.

Partially outlined the key next steps involved in seeking a resolution, based on how you would handle this situation, either through litigation or a particular form of alternative dispute resolution. Partially justified your response.

Satisfactorily outlined the key next steps involved in seeking a resolution, based on how you would handle this situation, either through litigation or a particular form of alternative dispute resolution. Satisfactorily justified your response.

Thoroughly outlined the key next steps involved in seeking a resolution, based on how you would handle this situation, either through litigation or a particular form of alternative dispute resolution. Thoroughly justified your response.

3. Determine whether Ms. Greene is an independent contractor or a part-time employee. Provide a rationale for your response.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely determined whether Ms. Greene is an independent contractor or a part-time employee. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Insufficiently determined whether Ms. Greene is an independent contractor or a part-time employee. Insufficiently provided a rationale for your response.

Partially determined whether Ms. Greene is an independent contractor or a part-time employee. Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Satisfactorily determined whether Ms. Greene is an independent contractor or a part-time employee. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Thoroughly determined whether Ms. Greene is an independent contractor or a part-time employee. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.

4. Explain the reasoning supporting whether or not Ms. Greene should receive the same benefits as part-time employees.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely explained the reasoning supporting whether or not Ms. Greene should receive the same benefits as part-time employees.

Insufficiently explained the reasoning supporting whether or not Ms. Greene should receive the same benefits as part-time employees.

Partially explained the reasoning supporting whether or not Ms. Greene should receive the same benefits as part-time employees.

Satisfactorily explained the reasoning supporting whether or not Ms. Greene should receive the same benefits as part-time employees.

Thoroughly explained the reasoning supporting whether or not Ms. Greene should receive the same benefits as part-time employees.

5. 2 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 15%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present