|
1. Discuss the elements that must be present in order for one to prove a valid claim under the law(s) specified (i.e., the Clean Water Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act).
Weight: 25%
|
Did not submit or incompletely discussed the elements that must be present in order for one to prove a valid claim under the law(s) specified.
|
Insufficiently discussed the elements that must be present in order for one to prove a valid claim under the law(s) specified.
|
Partially discussed the elements that must be present in order for one to prove a valid claim under the law(s) specified.
|
Satisfactorily discussed the elements that must be present in order for one to prove a valid claim under the law(s) specified.
|
Thoroughly discussed the elements that must be present in order for one to prove a valid claim under the law(s) specified.
|
|
2. Determine whether or not the activity of Simply Green Products amounts to a violation of the applicable law (i.e., the Clean Water Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act). If you chose the environmental issue, determine whether or not seepage from your products into a stream would violate the Clean Water Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act, or both. Explain your rationale. Explain your rationale.
Weight: 25%
|
Did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not the activity of Simply Green Products amounts to a violation of the applicable law. Did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not seepage from your products into a stream would violate the Clean Water Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act, or both if you chose the environmental issue. Did not submit or incompletely explained your rationale explained your rationale.
|
Insufficiently determined whether or not the activity of Simply Green Products amounts to a violation of the applicable law. Insufficiently determined whether or not seepage from your products into a stream would violate the Clean Water Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act, or both, if you chose the environmental issue. Insufficiently explained your rationale. explained your rationale.
|
Partially determined whether or not the activity of Simply Green Products amounts to a violation of the applicable law. Partially determined whether or not seepage from your products into a stream would violate the Clean Water Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act, or both, if you chose the environmental issue.
|
Satisfactorily determined whether or not the activity of Simply Green Products amounts to a violation of the applicable law. Satisfactorily determined whether or not seepage from your products into a stream would violate the Clean Water Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act, or both, if you chose the environmental issue. Satisfactorily explained your rationale. Satisfactorily determined whether or not continued use of the SafePack name by your company would violate the Lanham Act, if you chose the intellectual property matter. Satisfactorily explained your rationale.
|
Thoroughly determined whether or not the activity of Simply Green Products amounts to a violation of the applicable law. Thoroughly determined whether or not seepage from your products into a stream would violate the Clean Water Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act, or both, if you chose the environmental issue. Thoroughly explained your rationale. Thoroughly determined whether or not continued use of the SafePack name by your company would violate the Lanham Act, if you chose the intellectual property matter. Thoroughly explained your rationale.
|
|
3. Decide whether or not President Howard should refer this chosen matter to the company's outside counsel. Provide a rationale for your decision.
Weight: 25%
|
Did not submit or incompletely decided whether or not President Howard should refer this chosen matter to the company's outside counsel. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your rationale.
|
Insufficiently decided whether or not President Howard should refer this chosen matter to the company's outside counsel. Insufficiently provided a rationale for your rationale.
|
Partially decided whether or not President Howard should refer this chosen matter to the company's outside counsel. Partially provided a rationale for your rationale.
|
Satisfactorily decided whether or not President Howard should refer this chosen matter to the company's outside counsel. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your rationale.
|
Thoroughly decided whether or not President Howard should refer this chosen matter to the company's outside counsel. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your rationale.
|
|
4. 3 references
Weight: 10%
|
No references provided
|
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.
|
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.
|
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
|
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
|
naoiac
assignment_2.docx
0
