solutions pro long new class

OTL540 Critical Thinking Rubric - Module 1

Meets Expectation

Approaches Expectation

Below Expectation Limited Evidence

Content, Research, and Analysis 13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points Requirements Includes all of the

required components, as specified in the assignment, including assignment length and analysis of ID adoption from four bulleted perspectives.

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points Content Demonstrates

strong or adequate knowledge of instructional design models and their functions; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points Comparison Analysis

Demonstrates strong or adequate comparison and analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each model regarding the four bulleted areas.

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of comparison and analysis.

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of comparison and analysis.

Fails to demonstrate comparison and analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each model regarding the four bulleted areas.

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points Sources Cites and

integrates three credible sources as specified in description.

Cites and integrates two credible sources as specified in description.

Cites and integrates one credible source as specified in description.

Fails to cite and integrate sources.

OTL540 Critical Thinking Rubric - Module 1 Mechanics and Writing 9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points Demonstrates proper use of APA style

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than one significant error.

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than two to three significant errors.

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with four to five significant errors.

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with more than five significant errors.

Total points possible = 75