STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT - HARD PROFESSOR
12
Managing Innovation and
Fostering Corporate Entrepreneurship
Professor John Coy
12 - *
Learning Objectives
- After reading this chapter, you should have a good understanding of:
- The importance of implementing strategies and practices that foster innovation.
- The challenges and pitfalls of managing corporate innovation processes.
- The role of product champions and exit champions in internal corporate venturing.
- How independent venture teams and business incubators are used to develop corporate ventures.
12 - *
Learning Objectives
- After reading this chapter, you should have a good understanding of:
- How corporations create an internal environment and culture that promotes entrepreneurial development.
- The benefits and potential drawbacks of real options analysis in making resource deployment decisions in corporate entrepreneurship contexts.
- How an entrepreneurial orientation can enhance a firm’s efforts to develop promising corporate venture initiatives.
12 - *
Question
What is one of the most important sources of growth opportunities?
A) The economy
B) Labor capital
C) Financial capital
D) Innovation
*
Answer: D
12 - *
Managing Innovation
- Innovation: using new knowledge to transform organizational processes or create commercially viable products and services
- Latest technology
- Results of experiments
- Creative insights
- Competitive information
12 - *
Example
- Some Companies, such as Apple, are always innovating popular products, while others are constantly struggling for their one great idea.
- There are “five disciplines” for creating what customers want
- Identify important customer needs
- Create solutions that fill those needs
- Build innovation teams
- Empower "innovation champions" who keep the effort on track
- Align the entire enterprise around creating value for customers
Source: “Getting to ‘Aha!’,” Business Week. September 4, 2006.
12 - *
Types of Innovation
- Degree of innovativeness
- Radical innovation
- Fundamental changes and breakthroughs
- Evoke major departures from existing practices
- Can be highly disruptive
- Can transform or revolutionize a whole industry
- Incremental innovation
- Enhance existing practices
- Small improvements in products and processes
- Evolutionary applications within existing paradigms
12 - *
Continuum of Radical and
Incremental Innovations
Exhibit 12.1 Continuum of Radical and Incremental Innovations
12 - *
Types of Innovation
- Product and process innovations
- Product innovation
- Efforts to create product designs
- Applications of technology to develop new products for end users
- More radical and common during early stages of an industry’s life cycle
- Associated with differentiation strategies
12 - *
Types of Innovation
- Product and process innovations
- Process innovations
- Improving efficiency of an organizational process
- Manufacturing systems and operations
- Can improve materials utilization
- Shorten cycle time
- Increase quality
- More likely to occur in later stages of an industry’s life cycle
- Associated with cost leader strategies
12 - *
Challenges of Innovation
- Seeds versus Weeds
- Deciding the merits of innovative ideas
- Seeds – likely to bear fruit
- Weeds – should be cast aside
- Dilemma
- Some innovation projects require considerable level of investment before merit can be determined
12 - *
Challenges of Innovation
- Experience versus initiative
- Deciding who will lead an innovation project
- Senior managers
- Have experience and credibility
- Tend to be more risk averse
- Midlevel employees
- May be the innovators themselves
- May have more enthusiasm
12 - *
Challenges of Innovation
- Internal versus external staffing
- Innovation projects need competent staffs to succeed
- People drawn from inside the firm
- May have greater social capital
- Know the organization’s culture and routines
- May not be able to think outside the box
- People drawn from outside the firm
- Are costly to recruit, hire, train
- May have difficulty building relationships
12 - *
Challenges of Innovation
- Building capabilities versus collaborating
- Innovation projects often require building new sets of skills
- Firms can seek help
- Other departments
- Partner with other companies that bring resources and experience
- Partnerships
- Create dependencies and inhibit internal skills development
- Sharing benefits of innovation may create conflict
12 - *
Challenges of Innovation
- Incremental versus preemptive launch
- Companies must manage the timing and scale of new innovation projects
- Incremental launch
- Less risky
- Requires few resources
- Serves as a market test
- Can undermine the project’s credibility if too tentative
- Large-scale launch
- Requires more resources
- Can effectively preempt a competitive response
12 - *
Defining the Scope of Innovation
- Firms must define the “strategic envelope” (scope of the innovation efforts)
- In defining the strategic envelope, a firm should answer several questions
- How much will the innovation cost?
- How likely is it to actually become commercially viable?
- How much value will it add; that is, what will it be worth if it works?
- What will be learned if it does not pan out?
12 - *
Managing the Pace of Innovation
- Firms need to regulate the pace of innovation
- Incremental innovation
- May be six months to two years
- May use a milestone approach driven by goals and deadlines
- Radical innovation
- Typically long term – 10 years or more
- Often involves open-ended experimentation and time-consuming mistakes
- Strict timelines unrealistic
12 - *
Collaborating with Innovation Partners
- Innovation often requires collaborating with others who possess complementary knowledge and skills
- Partners can come from several sources
- Other personnel within the department
- Personnel within the firm but from another department
- Partners outside the firm
- Non-business sources, including research universities and the federal government
12 - *
Corporate Entrepreneurship
- Corporate culture
- Leadership
- Structural features that guide and constrain action
- Organizational systems that foster learning and manage rewards
- Use of teams in strategic decision making
- Whether the company is product or service oriented
- Whether the firm’s innovation efforts are aimed at product or process improvements
- The extent to which it is high-tech or low-tech
Determining
how
entrepreneurial projects will be pursued
12 - *
Focused Approaches to Corporate Entrepreneurship
Autonomous corporate venturing work group
- Autonomous corporate venturing (work) group
- Frees entrepreneurial team members from constraints imposed by existing norms and routines
- Facilitates open-minded creativity
- But, does isolate the group from the corporate mainstream
- New venture groups (NVGs)
- Business incubators
12 - *
New Venture Groups (NVGs)
- Goal is to identify, evaluate, and cultivate venture opportunities
- Typically function as semi-autonomous units with little formal structure
- Involvement includes
- Innovation and experimentation
- Coordinating with other corporate divisions
- Identifying potential venture partners
- Gathering resources
- Launching the venture
12 - *
Business Incubators
- Business incubators are designed to “hatch” new businesses
- Incubators provide some or all of the following functions
- Funding
- Physical space
- Business services
- Monitoring
- Networking
12 - *
Dispersed Approaches to
Corporate Entrepreneurship
- Dedication to principles and practices of entrepreneurship is spread throughout the firm
- Ability to change is a core capability
- Stakeholders can bring new ideas or venture opportunities to anyone in the organization
- Two related aspects of dispersed entrepreneurship
- Entrepreneurial culture
- Product champions
12 - *
Entrepreneurial Culture
- Culture of entrepreneurship
- Search for venture opportunities permeates every part of the organization
- Effect is strongest when it animates all parts of the organization
- Strategic leaders and the culture generate a strong impetus
- To innovate
- Take risks
- Seek out new venture opportunities
12 - *
Product Champions
- Product (or project) champions
- Bring entrepreneurial ideas forward
- Identify what kind of market exists for the product or service
- Find resources to support the venture
- Promote the venture concept to upper management
- New project must pass two critical stages
- Project definition
- Project impetus
12 - *
Measuring the Success of Corporate Entrepreneurship Activities
- Techniques used to limit the expense of venturing or to cut losses when entrepreneurial initiatives (CE) appear doomed
- Comparing strategic and financial CE goals
- Are the products or services offered by the venture accepted in the marketplace?
- Are the contributions of the venture to the corporation’s internal competencies and experience valuable?
- Is the venture able to sustain its basis of competitive advantage?
12 - *
Measuring the Success of Corporate Entrepreneurship Activities
- Techniques used to limit the expense of venturing or to cut losses when entrepreneurial initiatives (CE) appear doomed
- Exit champions
- Willing to question the viability of a venture project
- Demand hard evidence and challenge the belief system that is carrying an idea forward
- Hold the line on ventures that appear shaky
- Real options
- Managing the uncertainty associated with launching new ventures
12 - *
Real Options Analysis
- Real options analysis (ROA) is an investment tool from the field of finance.
- The phrase “real options” applies to situations where options theory and valuation techniques are applied to real assets or physical things as opposed to financial assets.
- Potential pitfalls include
- Agency theory and the back-solver dilemma
- Managerial conceit: overconfidence and the illusion of control
- Managerial conceit: irrational escalation of commitment
12 - *
Question
Discuss the traps that can affect decision makers. Have you experienced any of these?
*
First, managerial conceit occurs when decision makers past success makes them believe they possess superior expertise for managing uncertainty.
Second, employing the real-options perspective can encourage decision makers towards a biased action which may lead to carelessness.
12 - *
Entrepreneurial Orientation
Dimension Definition
Autonomy Independent action by an individual or team aimed at bringing forth a business concept or vision and carrying it through to completion.
Innovativeness A willingness to introduce novelty through experimentation and creative processes aimed at developing new products and services as well as new processes.
Proactiveness A forward-looking perspective characteristic of a marketplace leader that has the foresight to seize opportunities in anticipation of future demand.
Source: J. G. Covin and D. P. Sleving, “A conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship As Firm Behavior,” Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Fall 1991, pp. 7-25; G. T. Lumpkin and G. G. Dess, “Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance,” Academy of Management Review 21, no. 1 (1996), pp. 135-72; D. Miller, “The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms,” Management Science 29 (1983), pp. 770-91.
Adapted from Exhibit 12.3 Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation
12 - *
Entrepreneurial Orientation
Dimension Definition
Source: J. G. Covin and D. P. Sleving, “A conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship As Firm Behavior,” Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Fall 1991, pp. 7-25; G. T. Lumpkin and G. G. Dess, “Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance,” Academy of Management Review 21, no. 1 (1996), pp. 135-72; D. Miller, “The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms,” Management Science 29 (1983), pp. 770-91.
Adapted from Exhibit 12.3 Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation
Risk taking Making decisions and taking action without certain knowledge of probable outcomes; some undertakings may also involve making substantial resource commitments in the process of venturing forward.
Competitive An intense effort to outperform industry rivals. It is characterized by a combative posture or an aggressive response aimed at improving position or overcoming a threat in a competitive marketplace.
aggressiveness
12 - *
Entrepreneurial Orientation
- Autonomy
- Two techniques often used to promote autonomy
- Using skunkworks to foster entrepreneurial thinking
- Designing organization structures that support independent action
- Innovativeness
- Two methods used to enhance competitive position through innovativeness
- Fostering creativity and experimentation
- Investing in new technology, R&D, and continuous improvement
12 - *
Entrepreneurial Orientation
- Proactiveness
- Two methods to promote acting proactively
- Introducing new products or technological capabilities ahead of the competition
- Continuously seeking out new product or service offerings
- Competitive aggressiveness
- Two ways competitively aggressive firms enhance their entrepreneurial position
- Entering markets with drastically lower prices
- Finding successful business models and copying them.
12 - *
Entrepreneurial Orientation
- Risk taking
- Three types of risks faced by organizations and their executives
- Business risk taking
- Financial risk taking
- Personal risk taking
- Two methods to strengthen competitive position through risk taking
- Researching and assessing risk factors to minimize uncertainty
- Using techniques that have worked in other domains
12 - *
Example
- A design thinking approach can help you deal with risk.
- Here are seven ways to get started:
- Cultivate an unreasonable obsession with desirability
- Become more comfortable acting on your informed intuition
- Prototype, prototype, prototype
- Think big, but start small(er)
- Treat money as a positive constraint
- Make a list of the best things that could happen
- Seek challenges
Source: Rodriguea, Diego and Jacoby, Ryan. “Embracing Risk to Grow Innovation,” Business Week. May 16, 2007
12
Managing Innovation and
Fostering Corporate Entrepreneurship
Professor John Coy