English argumentative essay

1. HELEN, B. (2014). Canada won't issue visas to residents of countries with widespread Ebola. Canadian Press.

Summary:

This article discusses Canada is emulating Australia's example and has shut its avenues to individuals from the West African nations fighting Ebola. Canada government said it is another preparatory measures to secure the wellbeing and security of Canadians. “The issuances of visas for inhabitants with Ebola nation’s foundation and working grant application in Ebola influenced zone are consistently suspended.” (Helen, 2014, papa.2)However, a universal law representative reprimanded this move, saying it was an infringement of the International Health Regulations, which Canada served to draft in the outcome of the 2003 SARS episode.

This article is an opinion piece in a global journal. It is written for political persuading and worldwide community. The author list many quotes from WTO for proving that a visa ban is not an only solution for avoiding Ebola epidemics. This article is a very useful to directly support my stand of the article. It is because the standpoint of WTO and IHR are same as my standpoint on my essay. It gives credibility to my essay.

2. Phillip, A. (2014). Why hasn't the US closed its airports to travelers from Ebola-ravaged countries? The Washington Post.

Summary:

This article essentially examines the debate of U.s shuts its air terminals to explorers from Ebola-influenced nations. The author starts to discuss a patient in U.s sheets a flight from Liberia and touched base in Texas. Thusly, Author has question on the threat of guests who is getting the same flight with this patient, yet the author thinks confining air travel will aggravate West Africa's compassionate emergency.

This article is written for all citizen in U.S and U.S government. The author pull out many examples that shows how it is positive not to suspend the flight to West countries affecting Ebola virus. Author thinks travel confinements will make battling Ebola much harder. He likewise imagines that controlling the episode in West Africa is the best way to make whatever is left of the world more secure. Furthermore, he perceived that confining air travel will aggravate West Africa's compassionate emergency. This article is used for a counter argument, which is logical validity.

3. Phil, H. (2014). Majority of Americans Want Flights from Ebola-hit Countries Banned: NBC Online Survey.

Summary:

The article is about the greater part of Americans help banning all flights to the United States from nations encountering an Ebola episode, a selective NBC News online overview uncovers. The overview weighted for age, race, sex, training and locale to match U.S. registration information. “It found that 58 percent of Americans want to restrict on approaching flights from West African nations hit by the infection,”(Phil,2014,para.2) for example, Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone. Twenty percent of respondent agree the restriction being happening in the following months.

This article is an opinion piece in a health journal. It is written for U.S residents. The author quote survey to support the agreeing air restrictions by residents in U.S. This article is useful for my direct supportive agreement in my essay where I can use part of the fact in order to support my essay indirectly. It is good source that represents the reason why some residents in U.S do not want traveler or migrants from those Ebola affected countries. It gives a statistic credibility onto my essay.