For Kim Woods Only

profileeimhlfrac
english_composition_ii_week_iii_annotated_bibliography.pdf

Annotated Bibliography: Social Inequality 1

English Composition II

Annotated Bibliography: Social Inequality

Daniel Lee Gray #224648

Columbia Southern University

Annotated Bibliography: Social Inequality 2

Social Inequality

Slattery, M. (2003). Key ideas in Sociology. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes, Ltd

In the review of his book, “Key ideas in sociology”, Slattery states that there is differing

education social inequality in different countries. He says social inequality in education differs

also from generation to generation. Generally, Slattery says educational inequality is seen as the

relationship between the maximum attainted stage of education of an individual and that of

his/her parents. Slattery in his book states that there is fairly dissimilarity in all countries between

the levels of parents’ education in comparison to education level of their children. Nevertheless

he states that there has been a sable degree of education mobility in the recent half of the 20th

century

Abel, T. (2008). Cultural capital and social inequality in health. Journal of Epidemiology

Abel is the author of the “Journal of Epidemiology” In his review of “The cultural and social

inequality in health” article; Abel states that there is a relationship between learning inequality

and the institutions structures in the system of educational worldwide. He says that higher

education of a scholar is determined by the parents’ income. In this article, Abel states that there

is evident that learners struggle to do well, but they fail to go ahead with higher learning because

of the limited resources of their parents. Abel explains that majority of the students that do not

continue with higher education live in great poverty.

Annotated Bibliography: Social Inequality 3

Waters, M. (2006). The reshaping and dissolution of social class in advanced society. Theory and

Society Community Health

In the review of his book, Water suggests that the only way to eradicate educational social

inequality is through the government setting standard and affordable learning standards.

Water says it is also the responsibilities of a society’s people to devise the means of ensuring

their children are given an equal chance to do extremely well in education and achieve similar

productive and satisfying lives just like the richer society enjoy. According to water, Social

inequality is a minor problem that should be solved with the help of governmental support,

through social rearrangement, as well as through coming up with similar strategies of education

regardless of social class.

Kathryn, M. (2004). Social inequality; what really causes social inequality. The Oxford

University library

Kathryn begins her book “Social Inequality” with a major critical assessment of the existing

researches that assess whether the current accumulation in social inequality has any links with

rising variation in community domains such as the quality neighborhood way of life and that of a

family. She seeks to know if there is equal right to use to education as well as health care,

occupation satisfaction, and political contribution. Kathryn links the quick growing inequality in

school attendance to increasing training and lack of financial aid. In her book she emphasizes

that social Inequality plots out an agenda for investigation on American inequality.

Annotated Bibliography: Social Inequality 4

Daniel, D. (2011). Injustice: why social inequality persist. The policy press, the University of

Bristol

Daniel begins his book by stating that we live in a world full of inequality, characterized by

injustice. According to Daniel, this inequality is a result of few resources required to be family

distributed among many people. He states that his book is destined to redefine inequality. Daniel

continues to say that what was unfortunate yesterday is inequality today, and what seem to be

fair today will be inequality tomorrow. In his book Daniel as mentioned a number of beliefs that

people have towards inequality. He later shows how these beliefs are not true, holding that

inequality is varying depending on generation.