law
FOUNDATIONS OF BUSINESS LAW - ASSIGNMENT 1(10%)
DUE DATE: 9pm Friday 8 th
November 2014
INSTRUCTIONS TO STUDENTS
All assignments must be submitted electronically using Turnitin by 9 pm Friday 8
th November.
(SAIBT students please find out if you are also required to provide your
teacher with a hard copy of the assignment).
This assignment comprises FIVE questions that are based on the
information covered in Week 2: TOPIC 2 – Sources of Law and Week 3:
Tort of Negligence.
ALL questions must be answered and the assignment is worth a total of
10 marks.
The maximum word limit for Assignment 1 is 500 words.
Note: extra marks will NOT be given for additional information that
exceeds the word limit. Marks may in fact be deducted.
This assignment is not an essay; therefore, an introduction and conclusion
are not necessary. You must, however, specifically answer the questions
provided in a series of numbered sentences and paragraphs.
As this assignment is not a research assignment you can get all the
information you need from the lecture notes. The lecture notes can be
referenced as: “FBL – Lecture Notes 2014”. If you copy the information
directly from the lecture notes then you must use “inverted commas” and
indicate the page number.
Referencing Cases
When referring to a case in your assignment the complete citation (or
reference) for that case must be provided either in text or as a footnote or in a reference list at the end of your paper.
The following is an example of in text referencing:
The High Court has interpreted the Constitution to expand the
Commonwealth’s powers beyond that which the Founding Fathers
expected as shown in Amalgamated Society of Engineers v
Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd (1920) 28 CLR 129. This case supported
the High Court’s tendency to give an expanded meaning to the
words and terms used in the Constitution.
If the case is referenced in text (as above) or as a footnote, there is no need to reference it again.
If you choose to reference a case (or cases) at the end of your paper it
(they) must be referenced in alphabetical order according to the first
letter of the case name.
For example:
Case References
Bolton v Madden (1873) LR 9 QB 55
R v Clarke (1927) 40 CLR 227
SVT v Best & Less (2001) 187 ALR 302 Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) [1991] 1 QB 1
Note: If you choose this option then the cases must be referenced in an
exclusive list separately from other sources, such text books or the
lecture notes.
Please attach a cover sheet and be sure to label your assignment with
your name and student identification number.
READ THE FOLLOWING CASE STUDY
Tony is a chef and proprietor of a restaurant called ‘Taste of Italy’. Tony’s pasta sauces are highly acclaimed and his restaurant is always busy. Max,
a real estate agent, often eats at Tony’s restaurant, where he also
entertains his clients. To celebrate a recent successful deal in which he
earned a good commission, Max invited his client, Joe, a builder, to have
dinner with him at Taste of Italy. Max insisted on paying for the dinner.
He went up to the counter and ordered a ham and cheese pizza for
himself and a plate of pasta for Joe. Max also purchased a bottle of
expensive champagne to toast the sale of Joe’s property.
Tony personally brought their meals to the table and stopped for a chat.
After a brief conversation about business, family and the weather he left
Max and Joe to enjoy their meals. The champagne went down well and
the meals were delicious. It was a wonderful occasion until something unexpected occurred!!! As Joe chewed and swallowed what he believed
to be part of a black olive the bitter taste alerted him to something
unusual on his plate. Upon closer examination it was revealed to be part
of an insect, a cockroach in fact, and that he had already eaten most of it.
He pushed back his chair and ran to the bathroom where he was violently
ill for some time. He was eventually taken to hospital by ambulance
where he remained for a week recovering from a severe case of food
poisoning.
Tony quickly learned that the tomato sauce he had used in the pasta that
day was obviously contaminated by more than one cockroach. The sauce
had been obtained from Presto Products, manufacturers, in sealed plastic tubs. Obviously the insects were already in the container before it was
filled with the sauce. Since pasta sauces often contain black olives Tony
assumed that the particles in the sauce he was using in his cooking were
bits of olive.
Joe incurred medical expenses and was unable to travel to Sydney to
attend the Australian Builders’ Conference held in the week he spent
recovering in hospital. Since he could not get a refund for accommodation
costs he forfeited $1,000. In addition, Joe has now developed an eating
disorder which his counsellor attributes to the trauma of the food
poisoning experience. He will be required to attend ongoing counselling
sessions and needs to take a further 3 months break from his building
business.
Joe is contemplating taking legal action for his loss against Taste of Italy
and Presto Products and has come to you for advice.
ANSWER ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS
Question 1
Advise Joe against whom he should take legal action for his loss?
(You need to explain why you have advised Joe to choose this party) [2 mark]
Question 2 Is the action that Joe is considering taking described as civil or criminal?
(Explain why you have made this choice)
[1 mark]
What cause of action will Joe take?
[1 mark]
Who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant?
[1 mark]
TOTAL = 3 marks
Question 3 List the elements of the cause of action that must be proved by Joe in order to
succeed in his action.
[2 marks]
Question 4 Which earlier decision could be used as a precedent for Joe’s case?
What was the ratio decidendi of that case.
[2 marks]
Question 5
What remedy is Joe seeking from a sucessful action against the defendant? [1 mark]
TOTAL: 10 MARKS
“buon appetito”