Assignment #4 - R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC Read the R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC case. You are to write a 4 page report that answers the following questions:

profilenovlla
rubic_assignment_3.docx

Outcome Assessed

         Integrate policies and processes that promote a diverse workforce.

Grading Rubric for Assignment # 3 - Petty v. Metropolitan Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson County

 

Criteria

0

Unacceptable

20

Developing

30

Competent

40

Exemplary

1. What were the legal issues in this case?

Did not complete the assignment or the legal issues were identified with less than 70% accuracy and some information was inappropriate.

The legal issues were identified with 70 to 79% accuracy and some information was inappropriate or was not identified.

The legal issues were identified with 80 to 89% accuracy and appropriate information was identified.

The legal issues were identified with 90 to 100% accuracy and all appropriate information was identified.

2. Explain how the reemployment provisions of the USERRA were violated in this case.

Did not complete the assignment or How the reemployment provisions of the USERRA were violated in this case was explained with less than 70% accuracy and some information was inappropriate.

How the reemployment provisions of the USERRA were violated in this case was explained with 70 to 79% accuracy and some information was inappropriate or was not identified.

How the reemployment provisions of the USERRA were violated in this case was explained with 80 to 89% accuracy and appropriate information was identified.

How the reemployment provisions of the USERRA were violated in this case was explained with 90 to 100% accuracy and all appropriate information was identified.

3. Explain why the court concludes that Petty has a claim for discrimination under USERRA.

Did not complete the assignment or Why the court concludes that Petty has a claim for discrimination under USERRA was explained with less than 70% accuracy and some information was inappropriate.

Why the court concludes that Petty has a claim for discrimination under USERRA was explained with 70 to 79% accuracy and some information was inappropriate or was not identified.

Why the court concludes that Petty has a claim for discrimination under USERRA was explained with 80 to 89% accuracy and appropriate information was identified.

Why the court concludes that Petty has a claim for discrimination under USERRA was explained with 90 to 100% accuracy and all appropriate information was identified.

4. Explain what the police department should have done differently.

Did not complete the assignment or What the police department should have done differently was explained with less than 70% accuracy and some information was inappropriate.

What the police department should have done differently was explained with 70 to 79% accuracy and some information was inappropriate or was not identified.

What the police department should have done differently was explained with 80 to 89% accuracy and appropriate information was identified.

What the police department should have done differently was explained with 90 to 100% accuracy and all appropriate information was identified.

5. Clarity 

    

Did not complete the assignment or explanations are unclear and not organized.

(Major issues)

Explanations generally unclear and not well organized.

(Many issues)

Explanations generally clear and/or organized. (Minor issues)

Explanations very clear and well organized.

(Added helpful details.)

6. Writing – Grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, APA usage.

 

Did not complete the assignment or had 8 or more different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation or APA usage. (Major issues)

Had 6 - 7 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation or APA usage. (Many issues)

Had 4 - 5 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation or APA usage. (Minor issues)

Had 0 - 3 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation or APA usage.