| Case Project - Agricultural Transshipment Distribution Network |
| | Transportation Cost Per Rail Car: | | | | | Transportation Cost Per Rail Car: |
| | | To Proc Center | | | | | | To Customer |
| | From Farm | Louisville | Cincinatti | | | From Proc Center | Macon | Greenwood | Concord | Chatham |
| | Muncie | 8000 | 6000 | | | Louisville | 44000 | 34000 | 34000 | 32000 |
| | Brazil | 3000 | 8000 | | | Cincinnati | 57000 | 35000 | 28000 | 24000 |
| | Xenia | 9000 | 3000 |
| Decision Variables: |
| Xij | Muncie | Brazil | Xenia | Louisville | Cincinatti | Macon | Greenwood | Concord | Chatham |
| Muncie | | | | 0 | 0 |
| Brazil | | | | 0 | 0 |
| Xenia | | | | 0 | 0 |
| Louisville | | | | | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cincinatti | | | | | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Obj Function: | | Total Cost = $ | | | 0 |
| Constraints: | | Munice Farm Capacity | | | | <= | 3 | | Outbound |
| | | Brazil Farm Capacity | | | | <= | 6 | | Outbound |
| | | Xenia Farm Capacity | | | | <= | 5 | | Outbound |
| | | Louisville Proc Ctr Balance Constraint | | | | = | 0 | | Hub |
| | | Cincinatti Proc Ctr Balance Constraint | | | | = | 0 | | Hub |
| | | Macon Customer Demand | | | | = | 3 | | Inbound |
| | | Greenwood Customer Demand | | | | = | 4 | | Inbound |
| | | Concord Customer Demand | | | | = | 3 | | Inbound |
| | | Chatham Customer Demand | | | | = | 6 | | Inbound |
| Hint: check total supply capacity and total customer demand before you proceed |
| yellow | indicates infeasible shipping route |
Salal
studenttemplate-agritransshipnetworkv2.xls
