FINITE MATH 100% ORIGINAL & A+ QUALITY WORK
Running head: Finite Math
2
Finite Math
Finite Math
Introduction
This work is an attempt to develop various mathematical models that can be applied in determining various financial variables in a mortgage loan which is an annuity by virtue of its installment payments. It uses mathematical models, applies mathematical formulas by giving step-by-step explanations, illustrates using an example which is run through an excel sheet by applying the formula derived and ends by giving interpretation of excel results.
Models Derivation
A continuous repayment is a mortgage loan which is paid by way of a continuous annuity. Generally, settling of mortgages occur over a period of years by a series of annuities with each payment accumulating compound interest from the time the deposit is made till the end of the mortgage life. With a loan, per period interest rate
, periods to maturity
and regular per period payment
, the end of period balancing equation can be given as:
In a continuous repayment mortgage of this nature it would be interesting derive a time- continuous equation. The classical formulation of the present value of annuities of fixed monthly payments with a mount
invested to attract
monthly interest rate is given as
This formula can be reorganized to get the monthly payment on the principal
given
and
.
Replacing with
where
is the annual interest rate, and the annual frequency of periods of compounding is represented by
. We again replace
with
with T being the total loan period. In this more general form we can obtain
-the fixed payment corresponding to the stated frequency. If, for instance
365,
corresponds to a daily annuity (Lowenstein, 2009).
As becomes large,
becomes smaller as the product
approaches a limiting value.
It is good to note that is simply the amount paid every year given the annual payment rate
.
This reasoning well argues that
With the application of the same principle to the formula for annual repayment we are able to determine the limiting value:
At this juncture in the orthodox formulation for PV is better presented as a function of N and time t:
We can use this derivation to get quite a number of solutions to day-to-day mathematical and financial problems.
Calculation of Accumulated Mortgage Interest and Principal Payments
Given the annual interest payment as
we can integrate both sides of this expression to get
Where
The accumulated interest payments from
to
;
The accumulated principal payments over the loan life; and
The cumulated fixed payments at the end of time t
If we evaluate, we get an expression for
which is the interest paid:
It can be observed that the second integral evaluates to hence:
This algebraic expression is identically the same thing with the one above.
Period of a loan
A borrower who can afford an annual repayment rate can have his repayment period determined by rearranging the
equation as follows:
Calculation of Interest rate on Mortgage
In a discrete time interval model, determination of mortgage based interest rate with the rest of the parameters is not possible with the use of many analytical methods.
At first look this would pass off for the case in the continuous model.
Given:
We can do a little simplification as follows:
To increase the apprehensiveness of the equation above as a function of, we can respectively apply hypothetical values to
,
and
as 10000, 6000 and 3. The minimum value of the resulting function can be determined by differentiation:
By nature this function is parabolic between the roots at thus we can estimate the required value as:
The Present Value and the Future value Formulae
Corresponding to the classical PV formula given as:
We can implore this to our already established time-continuous analogue:
Example
|
The average cost of a new home in State College, PA is $135,000. With our decent credit score PNC Bank would approve us for a 3-year mortgage at 6.1% compounded monthly. However in an attempt to reduce total interest paid we will calculate assuming; no money down, $10,000 down and, $25,000 down. |
Solution from the Model
Using the formula
We get that the monthly payments would be $4,113.08.
We will construct a spread sheet in excel which will show remaining balance per year, total interest paid for each scenario assuming all payments made on time, and payment. Then to find balance per year will we change n accordingly in our excel model (Lowenstein, 2009).
The Excel output is as follows:
|
Period |
Beginning Balance |
Payment |
Principal |
Interest |
Cumulative Principal |
Cumulative Interest |
Ending Balance |
|
1 |
135,000 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,426.83 |
686.25 |
|
|
131,573 |
|
2 |
131,573 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,444.25 |
668.83 |
$3,444.25 |
668.83 |
128,129 |
|
3 |
128,129 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,461.76 |
651.322 |
$6,906.01 |
1320.15 |
124,667 |
|
4 |
124,667 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,479.36 |
633.725 |
$10,385.37 |
1953.88 |
121,188 |
|
5 |
121,188 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,497.04 |
616.038 |
$13,882.41 |
2569.91 |
117,691 |
|
6 |
117,691 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,514.82 |
598.261 |
$17,397.23 |
3168.18 |
114,176 |
|
7 |
114,176 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,532.69 |
580.394 |
$20,929.92 |
3748.57 |
110,643 |
|
8 |
110,643 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,550.64 |
562.437 |
$24,480.56 |
4311.01 |
107,093 |
|
9 |
107,093 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,568.69 |
544.387 |
$28,049.25 |
4855.39 |
103,524 |
|
10 |
103,524 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,586.83 |
526.247 |
$31,636.09 |
5381.64 |
99,937 |
|
11 |
99,937 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,605.07 |
508.014 |
$35,241.16 |
5889.65 |
96,332 |
|
12 |
96,332 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,623.39 |
489.688 |
$38,864.55 |
6379.34 |
92,709 |
|
13 |
92,709 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,641.81 |
471.269 |
$42,506.36 |
6850.61 |
89,067 |
|
14 |
89,067 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,660.32 |
452.756 |
$46,166.69 |
7303.37 |
85,406 |
|
15 |
85,406 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,678.93 |
434.15 |
$49,845.62 |
7737.52 |
81,728 |
|
16 |
81,728 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,697.63 |
415.448 |
$53,543.25 |
8152.97 |
78,030 |
|
17 |
78,030 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,716.43 |
396.652 |
$57,259.68 |
8549.62 |
74,313 |
|
18 |
74,313 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,735.32 |
377.76 |
$60,995.00 |
8927.38 |
70,578 |
|
19 |
70,578 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,754.31 |
358.772 |
$64,749.31 |
9286.15 |
66,824 |
|
20 |
66,824 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,773.39 |
339.688 |
$68,522.70 |
9625.84 |
63,050 |
|
21 |
63,050 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,792.57 |
320.507 |
$72,315.28 |
9946.34 |
59,258 |
|
22 |
59,258 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,811.85 |
301.228 |
$76,127.13 |
10247.6 |
55,446 |
|
23 |
55,446 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,831.23 |
281.851 |
$79,958.36 |
10529.4 |
51,615 |
|
24 |
51,615 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,850.71 |
262.375 |
$83,809.07 |
10791.8 |
47,764 |
|
25 |
47,764 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,870.28 |
242.801 |
$87,679.35 |
11034.6 |
43,894 |
|
26 |
43,894 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,889.95 |
223.127 |
$91,569.30 |
11257.7 |
40,004 |
|
27 |
40,004 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,909.73 |
203.353 |
$95,479.03 |
11461.1 |
36,094 |
|
28 |
36,094 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,929.60 |
183.479 |
$99,408.64 |
11644.6 |
32,165 |
|
29 |
32,165 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,949.58 |
163.503 |
$103,358.21 |
11808.1 |
28,215 |
|
30 |
28,215 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,969.66 |
143.426 |
$107,327.87 |
11951.5 |
24,245 |
|
31 |
24,245 |
$4,113.08 |
$3,989.83 |
123.247 |
$111,317.70 |
12074.7 |
20,255 |
|
32 |
20,255 |
$4,113.08 |
$4,010.12 |
102.965 |
$115,327.82 |
12177.7 |
16,245 |
|
33 |
16,245 |
$4,113.08 |
$4,030.50 |
82.5805 |
$119,358.32 |
12260.3 |
12,215 |
|
34 |
12,215 |
$4,113.08 |
$4,050.99 |
62.0922 |
$123,409.31 |
12322.4 |
8,164 |
|
35 |
8,164 |
$4,113.08 |
$4,071.58 |
41.4996 |
$127,480.89 |
12363.9 |
4,092 |
|
36 |
4,092 |
$4,113.08 |
$4,092.28 |
20.8024 |
$131,573.17 |
12384.7 |
0 |
Interpretation of Results
At the end of every month we will be making a constant payment of $4,113.08 to PNC Bank of which a part will be principal and the rest interest. Interest will be reducing by the expiry of the loan term because at any one time the outstanding principal is being offset.
The application would be the same if a down payment were made at the start. The implication of the down payment is that it cannot constitute the starting outstanding balance thus with a down payment of $25000, the beginning balance would be $110000.
References
Kieso, D. E., & Weygandt, J. J. (2007). Intermediate Accounting (12th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. p. 738. ISBN 0-471-74955-9.
Lowenstein, R. (2009). . "Book Review: 'The Myth of the Rational Market' by Justin Fox". Washington Post. Retrieved 21 June 2014.