Need Assistance with a MGTU 400 essay

MGTU 400 Assignment 6 Handout and Rubric Individual Assignment 6: Interview Length: The interview guideline is 3- 5 pages, double-spaced (Times Roman 12 font

with standard 1” margins). Your final submission will include an introduction that gives an overview of what you learned in the interview and how that connects to this class. The paper will reflect a summary of the key points gleaned from the interview.

Due: Monday of Week 7 Post: Week 6 Assignments folder

This assignment is designed for you to gain real-life exposure to a global business professional that faces the challenges and opportunities in today’s fast-paced and quickly-changing environment. Select a business professional who has dealings with and/or in your country of choice. If you are concerned about locating an appropriate business leader, email your instructor Conduct an interview with the professional, either in person or by phone (and use the approved questionnaire). Please contact your instructor if you are having difficulty confirming an appropriate interview candidate by Week 3 as you have to complete this assignment by interviewing a professional. Also remember you are writing a paper not just simply copying and pasting the questionnaire with their answers dropped in. This is to be a paper based upon what you have learned.

This assignment includes:

1. Each student is to gain instructor approval of your interviewee prior to

conducting the interview. 2. It is important that you show respect during the interview. 3. It is important that you follow the approved questionnaire questions from

the previous assignment. 4. Students are to apply the economic theories studied thus far in this course

as context for your interview and cite the text (at a minimum) in the paper.

To help you prepare for your interview, review the interview with professional news correspondent Katie Couric on how to conduct a successful interview. She discusses preparation, effective questions, how to draw your subject out and make them comfortable, etc. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eOynrI2eTM

Evaluation Criteria for Interview Questionnaire Elements

Exemplary 100

Proficient 85

Developing 70

Emerging 55

Questions

20 Clearly and creatively writes a paper that is based upon the approved questions.

17 Clearly writes a paper that is based upon the approved questions.

14 Somewhat clearly writes a paper that is based upon the approved questions.

11 Does not tie the paper to the approved questions.

Introduction 20 Clearly and concisely defines the rationale for the questions in the introduction, and gives a good overview of the results of the interview.

17 Clearly defines the rationale for the questions in the introduction, and gives a good overview of the results of the interview.

14 Somewhat clearly defines the rationale for the questions in the introduction, and gives a fairly good overview of the results of the interview.

11 Limited or confusing rationale for the questions. The introduction does not make the main points clear.

Critical Analysis

20 Consistently employs critical analysis to research and analyze the interview; effectively synthesizes data to draw strong conclusions and value for the interview.

17 Often employs critical analysis to research and analyze the interview; synthesizes data to draw reasonable conclusions and shows value for the interview.

14 Somewhat employs critical analysis to research and analyze the interview; somewhat analyzes the data to draw conclusions and shows only some value for the interview.

11 Limited use of critical analysis to research and analyze the interview; limited if any analysis or synthesis of data to draw conclusions that show little or no value for the interview.

Sources

20 Uses text book and

17 Uses text book,

14 Uses text book

11 Uses text book

other sources and shows strong connections to that interview. Accurately adheres to APA standards; reference page and citations are correct.

and other sources and shows some connections to the interview. Adheres to APA standards; with less than three minor errors.

and one other source and does not show connections to the interview. Adheres to APA standards; reference page and citations are correct with more than four errors.

and no other viable sources and shows weak connections to the interview. Misses many APA standards; reference page and citations have numerous errors.

Writing Mechanics

20 The paper is logical and well- written; spelling, grammar and punctuation are accurate. Paper is the required length of 3 - 5 pages of content, and includes correctly prepared references.

17 The paper is logical and well- written but with minor errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. The paper may be 10% longer or shorter than the required length.

14 The paper is somewhat logical and well-written; some errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. The paper is short, and may not include all components.

11 The paper lacks clarity and may be confusing with numerous errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation or may be too short to cover all of the components.