Stereotypes and Heuristics

profileDa1989
stereotypes__heuristics.zip

Stereotypes _Heuristics/A Synopsis of the Essay.doc

COGNITIVE DISSONANCE 2

A Synopsis of what the essay should entail

Abstract

Key Word

Introduction

1. An evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures

2a. An evaluation of the methods used to measure biases. (Paraphrased Subheading) Summarized: Evaluated Biases

2b. Do these methods conform to psychometrically sound measurement principles? Why or why not? (Paraphrased Subheading) Summarized: Psychometric Conformity

3a. An evaluation of the methods used to measure stereotypes. (Paraphrased Subheading) Summarized: Stereotypes Evaluated

3b. Do these methods conform to psychometrically sound measurement principles? Why or why not? (Paraphrased Subheading) Summarized: Psychometric Conformity

4a. An evaluation of the methods used to measure heuristics. (Paraphrased Subheading) Summarized: Evaluated Heuristics.

4b. Do these methods conform to psychometrically sound measurement principles? Why or why not? (Paraphrased Subheading) Summarized: Psychometric Conformity.

Conclusion

Reference

8 Minimum references Required

Use Linking Words and Phrases to connect from one question to the other. See examples of Useful Linking Words and Phrases for Essays online

Stereotypes _Heuristics/Stereotypes and Heuristics.docx

Stereotypes and Heuristics

Due: Thursday, 6/26/2014

Mitigating biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is a topic of much research including the creation of methods to measure the extent of these behaviors. In this assignment, you will evaluate the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

Use APA style for writing this Essay. This assignment requires that at least six additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and in-text citation from each source be included. Use at least 3 different references and citations per question (total at minimum 8 refs). Resources provided bellow.

Use Abstract, Keyword, Introduction and conclusion. One recommendation that I have is to copy/paste the actual criteria for each section in the paper—make these subheadings paraphrased. This will help ensure that you are addressing all parts of the essay requirements. Please proofread and cross check APA citation errors. Write in Third Person Scholarly writing: No quotes from Authors. Let your voice be heard and not reporting lecture back to me. Please expand your discussion and highlight other important theorists and theories where needed. Introduction, and conclusion SHOULD be comprehensive and to include more main ideas and thoughts. Use transitional phrases to link one paragraph to the other. Please follow all instructions carefully and religiously. No assumptions. If you need any clarification on anything please let me know. Please note preferred plagiarism checker to check final writing is TURNITIN software not to be more than 8% plagiarized. Develop all arguments elaborately please.

Directions:

Write a paper of 1,250 words in which you evaluate the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics. Include the following in your paper:

1. An evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures

2. An evaluation of the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics. Do these methods conform to psychometrically sound measurement principles? Why or why not?

Resources

1. Value Similarities Among Fathers, Mothers, and Adolescents and the Role of a Cultural Stereotype: Different Measurement Strategies Reconsidered

Read:

Roest, A. C., Dubas, J., Gerris, J. M., & Engels, R. E. (2009). Value similarities among fathers, mothers, and adolescents and the role of a cultural stereotype: Different measurement strategies reconsidered. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19(4), 812-833. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00621.x.

2. One-Reason Decision Making Unveiled: A Measurement Model of the Recognition Heuristic

Read:

Hilbig, B. E., Erdfelder, E., & Pohl, R. F. (2010). One-reason decision making unveiled: A measurement model of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(1), 123-134. doi:10.1037/a0017518.

3. Ignorance- Versus Evidence-Based Decision Making: A Decision Time Analysis of the Recognition Heuristic

Read:

Hilbig, B. E., & Pohl, R. F. (2009). Ignorance- versus evidence-based decision making: A decision time analysis of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(5), 1296-1305. doi:10.1037/a0016565

I HAVE GIVING YOU 3 REFERENCES HERE, YOU NEED TO ADD 5 MORE REFERENCES TO GIVE YOU A TOTAL OF 8 REFERENCES. YOU MUST USE 2 REFERENCES PER SUB HEADING-QUESTION TOTAL 8 IN ALL.

APA CITATIONS