Biology Project

profilelyoung20
scin130presentationgradesheet.docx

SCIN130 Presentation Grade Sheet

Name:

Grade:

Evaluation Criteria

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Additional Instructor Feedback/

Comments

Points

Subject Knowledge

and Content

45-50 points

Subject knowledge is evident throughout the project. Information is clear, thorough, appropriate, and correct, and all topics assigned were covered and minimum/ maximum requirements fulfilled. Accurately researched and utilized a variety of relevant information about the organism.

30-44 points

Subject knowledge is evident in much of the project. Most topics assigned were covered fully and/or min/max requirements fulfilled. Most information is clear, thorough, appropriate, and correct. Collected relevant information from multiple sources of information about the organism.

16-29 points

Some subject knowledge is evident. Not all topics assigned were covered at all or fully. Some Information is confusing, incorrect, flawed, or irrelevant.

0-15 points

Subject knowledge is not evident. Information is confusing, incorrect, or flawed.

Layout

And

Organization

20-25 points

The layout is visually pleasing and is appropriate to convey information in an effective manner with suitable use of fonts - color, size, type for text and headings; background color; placement & size of graphics/videos; and audio/written narration. There is a logical sequence to the presentation.

13-19 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message but lacks the appropriate use of one or two of the following: fonts - color, size, type for text and headings; background color; placement & size of graphics/videos; audio/written narration; and logical sequencing.

6-12 points

The layout shows some structure, but lacks the appropriate use of two to three of the following: fonts - color, size, type for text and headings; background color; placement & size of graphics/videos; audio/written narration; and logical sequencing.

0-5 points

The layout lacks structure and fluidity. It lacks the appropriate use of four or more of the following: fonts - color, size, type for text and headings; background color; placement & size of graphics/videos; audio/written narration; and logical sequencing.

Narration Mechanics

10 points

The text is written and/or audio narration spoken with no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling where applicable.

6-9 points

The text is clearly written and audio narration spoken with little or no editing required for grammar, punctuation, and spelling where applicable.

1-5 points

Spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors or spoken narration distract or impair readability/ comprehension.

(3 -5 errors)

0 points

Spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors severely distract or impair readability/ comprehension.

(more than 5 errors)

Citations

10 points

All sources (audio/video/ narrative) are properly cited and credible references were utilized.

6-9 points

Most sources are properly cited and credible in nature. 

1-5 points

Few sources are properly cited and credible in nature. 

0 points

No credible sources were properly cited or presented. 

Technical

5 points

Project runs perfectly with no technical problems. For example, there are no error messages, all sound, video, or other files are found.

3-4 points

Project runs adequately with minor technical problems.

1-2 points

Project runs minimally. There are many technical problems when viewing the project.

0 points

Project does not run satisfactorily. There are too many technical problems to view the project.

Total Points (out of 100 possible)

1