May-Can-Should how research paper

Your Paper Title

Your Name

Date

Class Name and Section

Dr. Kahlib Fischer

Abstract

Defining the Problem

Overview

Impacts

Root Causes

Competing Interpretations

Policy Alternatives

Policy Alternative 1 Comment by Fischer, Kahlib: Change each of these headings to reflect the names of the actual policy alternatives.

Policy Alternative 2

Policy Alternative 3

May

Policy Alternative 1

Biblical guidelines and principles.

Constitutional guidelines for federal and state involvement.

Policy Alternative 2

Biblical guidelines and principles.

Constitutional guidelines for federal and state involvement.

Policy Alternative 3

Biblical guidelines and principles.

Constitutional guidelines for federal and state involvement.

Can

Policy Alternative 1

Financial feasibility.

Political feasibility.

Physical feasibility.

Policy Alternative 2

Financial feasibility.

Political feasibility.

Physical feasibility.

Policy Alternative 3

Financial feasibility.

Political feasibility.

Physical feasibility.

How

Policy Alternative 1

Timing.

Logistics.

Effectiveness.

Policy Alternative 2

Timing.

Logistics.

Effectiveness.

Policy Alternative 3

Timing.

Logistics.

Effectiveness.

Policy Recommendation Comment by Fischer, Kahlib (Helms School of Government): Provides an assessment of whether and which of the 2-3 alternatives should be adopted based upon the May-Can-How analysis.

References Comment by Fischer, Kahlib: List your sources in APA format below.