Microsoft Project 2010 & Microsoft Word
example PM/EXAMPLE - Xyzzy_Part_A.mpp
example PM/EXAMPLE - Xyzzy_Part_B.mpp
example PM/EXAMPLE - Xyzzy_Part_C.mpp
example PM/Assessment item -PM - instructions EXAMPLE.docx
Introduction and Student Guide
This assessment item is to be completed individually.
The case study simulates a project management scenario where the student takes on the role of project manager. The case information is not complete so where necessary students will have to make assumptions and argue the pros and cons for any recommendations they make.
If necessary, students are expected to find relevant information in the academic literature to justify their answers.
To assist students in their assessment solution development the following information is provided:
· Product development case description
· Specific assessment questions that must be answered
· Information regarding the submission of the assessment
· Marking guide
Product Development Case Description
Xyzzy is a medium sized company that develops and manufactures mobile data collection devices. You are an employee of Xyzzy and work as project manager in the product development department. The people involved in this case are:
· You are Ms. Andersen, the project manager.
· Mr. O’Brian is the Director of Product Development.
· Ms. Horsell is the Director of Marketing and Portfolio Management.
· Ms. Thomas is the Human Resource Manager.
· Functional line managers in the research and development department.
· Engineers and members of your project team.
You have been leading a small team of experienced engineers conducting a technical feasibility study to investigate if it is possible to modify one of its standard products to create a product variant to satisfy the needs of a local organisation involved in environmental management. You are planning to hold a M1 Milestone Concept Review on Friday 16th August 2013. (For the purposes of this assignment assume that this is next week.) The concept review is one of the milestones in the company’s product development process.
The need for the new product has been identified by the marketing department lead by Ms. Horsell, Director of Marketing and Portfolio Management. Ms. Horsell provided your small project team with a product brief, outlining the special end user, sales and service requirements to supplement the requirements already established for the standard product. She also developed the business case for the product and believes that there is a market for this variant of the product beyond the customer with the original requirement/request for the modified product.
Great Devices Milestones
The milestones your team will use are:
A. M1 Concept review complete (At this point the feasibility study will be complete. A go/no-go decision for the project will be made at this milestone).
B. M2 Designs Complete and Reviewed (At this point the overall design will be complete and reviewed. A go/no-go decision for procurement will be made at this milestone. For the purposes of this assignment assume that this go/no-go decision is made at the design review meeting, so you are not required to add any additional tasks for this decision making process).
C. P1 proto build start (Everything is ready so that the product “prototype 1” is able to be manufactured with the quality level expected).
D. P2 proto build start (Everything is ready so that the product “prototype 2” is able to be manufactured with the quality level expected).
E. M3 Final Design review (At this point the product quality is verified based on the product validation testing carried out on the last prototype. A go/no-go decision for production of required number of units for customer is made).
F. M4 Launch review (A go/no-go decision depending if all business areas are ready for market launch and required number of devices are in stock. For the purposes of this assignment this is the milestone marking the end of the project. You are not required to add a task to make the decision – it will be made by senior management at this point. This milestone is the end of your schedule).
At the M1 concept review it was decided to go ahead with the project. M1 milestone is to be the start of the project. Make the start of the project Monday 19/8/13. This is M1 – the first milestone.
On Monday 19/8/13 (after M1) you have a workshop led by Mr. Software, Mr. Mechanics, Mr. Electronics, Mr. Production and Mr. Validation to plan the product development activities. They are members of your project team and very experienced managers and engineers.
From the team workshop you have obtained the following information:
1. A work break down structure (WBS), resource estimates and some dependencies provided in Table 1 below.
2. Mr. Production also did some preparations prior to the workshop and his input is summarized in the Activity-In-the-Box (AIB) network diagrams in Figure 1.
Note that the following abbreviations are used:
· Electronic Engineer (EE)
· Software Engineer (SW)
· Mechanical Engineer (ME)
· Test Engineer (TE)
· Production Engineer (PE)
· Technical Writer (TW)
· Printed Wire Board (circuit board) (PWB)
· Electromagnetic Compliance (EMC)
· Planning Workshop (PW)
Table 1- Work Breakdown Structure
|
Activity |
Description |
Predecessor(s) |
Person days/weeks of effort 1(and type of resource required.) |
To be completed at the following milestone |
|
PW: Planning Workshop |
Planning workshop |
M1 |
2 days fixed duration. 1SE, 1TE, 1ME, 1 PE, 1EE, 1TW will be in attendance. |
|
|
1. Electronics |
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 PWB outline modifications |
|
Planning workshop(PW) |
1 person-week of EE. (fixed duration) |
|
|
1.2 Component selection |
Selection of electronic components. Must be started together with 1.3. |
1.1 |
2 person-weeks of EE. (fixed duration) |
|
|
1.3 P1 circuit design and PWB layout |
Creation of circuit diagram and PWB layout. Breadboard solution created. Must be started together with 1.2. |
1.1 |
2 person-weeks of EE (fixed duration). |
|
|
1.4 P1 electronics verification tests |
Electronic verification tests with the use of the P1 prototypes. |
P1 build complete (5.5) |
1 person-week of EE. |
|
|
1.5 P2 circuit design improvements |
Electronic improvements to circuit diagram, component selection and layout. |
1.4 |
1 person-week of EE. |
|
|
1.6 P2 electronics verification tests |
Electronic verification tests with the use of the P2 prototypes. |
P2 build complete (6.5) |
1 person-week of EE. |
M3 |
|
1.7 Thermal verification tests |
Verification that electronic heat generation and heat transmission through covers is acceptable. |
P2 build complete |
1 person-day of EE. |
|
|
1.8 EMC verification tests |
Verification of compliance with electromagnetic compliance regulations. |
1.7 |
1 person day of EE. |
M3 |
|
2. Software |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 Software specification |
Specification of the software functionality based on user requirements. |
PW |
1 person-week of SE. |
|
|
2.2 User interface specification |
Detailed specifications of the user interface |
2.1 |
1 person-week of SE. |
|
|
2.3 Database specifications |
|
2.1 |
1 person-week of SE. |
|
|
2.4 Software test plans |
|
2.2,2.3 |
2 person-weeks of SE |
|
|
2.5 Software design |
|
2.1 |
1 person-week of SE. |
|
|
2.6 User interface design |
|
2.2 |
1 person-week of SE. |
|
|
2.7 Database design |
|
2.3 |
1 person-week of SE. |
|
|
2.8 Review of designs and test plans
|
|
1.2,1.3, 2.4, 2.5,2.6,2.7, 4.1, 3.4 |
2 days fixed duration. 4SE, 1TE, 2ME, 1 PE, 3EE, 1TW will be in attendance. |
M2 |
|
2.9 Software development |
You can assume that there are four modules of approximately similar effort and if there are 4 SEs available for this task it could be reduced to a duration of 3 weeks (this is still 12 person-weeks of SE effort). For this assignment, you can also assume that individual modules will be tested during development |
2.8 (i.e. M2) |
12 person-week of SE. In your initial schedule assign 2 SEs to this task, so it should take 6 weeks. |
|
|
2.10 User interface development |
Assume this includes interface development and testing |
2.8 |
3 person-weeks of SE. |
|
|
2.11 Database development |
Assume this includes development and testing |
2.8 |
4 person-weeks of SE. |
|
|
2.12 R1 release creation |
Creation of the R1 software release used for testing with the P1 prototype (in 4.4) |
2.9,2.10,2.11 |
2 person-days of SE |
|
|
2.13 R1 error correction and user interface improvements |
|
4.4 |
1 person-week of SE. |
|
|
2.14 R2 release creation |
Creation of the R2 software release to be used for testing with the P2 prototype |
2.13 |
2 days of SE. |
|
|
2.15 R2 release tests |
Testing of the R2 release with the P2 prototype |
2.14,6.5 (prototype 2 build completed) |
1 person-week of SE. |
|
|
2.16 R2 error corrections |
Correction of errors |
2.15 |
1 person-week of SE. |
|
|
2.17 R2 interoperability tests |
Testing of interoperability with 3rd party accessory devices. |
2.16 |
1 person-week of SE. |
|
|
2.18 R2 interoperability error correction |
Correction of errors |
2.17 |
1 person-week of SE. |
|
|
2.19 R3 sales release creation |
Creation of the software sales release |
2.18 |
2 days of SE. |
M3 |
|
3. Mechanics |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 Industrial design |
Design of the industrial design for the device. Must be started in parallel with 1.1 and 2.1 |
PW |
2 weeks of a ME/industrial designer. |
|
|
3.2 PWB outline modifications |
Modifications of the PWB to fit the industrial design, new components and usability requirements. Must be done in parallel with 1.1 |
3.1 |
1 person-week of ME. |
|
|
3.3 P1 mechanical CAD design |
CAD design of mechanical plastic parts and metal parts for the device. |
3.2 |
2 person-weeks of ME. |
|
|
3.4 Tolerance stack analysis |
Analysis of the mechanical tolerance stacks compared to part tooling and moulding capabilities. |
3.3 |
1 person-week of ME. |
|
|
3.5 P1 mechanical part analysis |
Physical analysis of moulded plastic parts and sheet metal parts used in the first prototype |
P1 build complete |
1 person-week of ME. |
|
|
3.6 P2 mechanical part modifications |
Modification of moulding and sheet metal tools used for P2 parts. |
3.5 |
2 person-weeks of ME. |
|
|
3.7 Mechanical tool approval |
Evaluation of P2 mechanical parts and approval of moulding and sheet metal tools used in part manufacture. |
P2 build complete |
2 weeks of ME. |
M3 |
|
4. Verification |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 Test plan creation |
Creation of a plan documenting what is to be tested. |
PW |
2 person-week of TE
|
M2 |
|
4.2 Component tests |
Test of key hardware component reliability to various standard tests like drop and humidity.
|
After delivery of components for P1 i.e. 5.1,5.2,5.3 and also 4.1) |
1 person-week of TE |
P1 |
|
4.3 Module tests |
Test of module functionality after assembly. |
P1 build complete, 4.2 |
1 person-week of TE. |
|
|
4.4 System integration tests |
Test of integration of modules and R1 software – i.e. testing of P1 prototype |
4.3 ,2.12 |
1 person-week of TE and 1 person-week of SE |
P2 |
|
4.5 Product validation tests |
Test of product against reliability to various standard tests like drop and humidity and end user requirements. |
4.4, P2 build complete (6.5) |
1 person-week of TE |
|
|
4.6 Technical Construction File compilation |
Creation of documentation for regulatory approvals. |
4.5 |
1 person-week of TE. |
|
|
4.7 Type approval and regulatory approval tests |
Approvals from regulatory authorities. |
4.6 |
4 weeks by regulatory authorities. |
M3 |
|
5. prototype 1 build |
see figure 1 for details |
See fig 1 for details |
See fig 1 for details |
|
|
6. prototype 2 build |
see figure 1 for details |
see figure 1 for details |
see figure 1 for details |
|
|
7. Documentation |
|
|
|
|
|
7.1 documentation plan |
Table of contents etc. |
2.8 |
1 person-week of TW and 1 person-week of SE |
|
|
7.2 development of documentation |
TW writes documentation |
7.1 |
2 person-weeks of TW |
|
|
7.3 review of documentation |
Review by SE and corrections by TW |
7.2 |
1 person-week of TW and 1 person-week of SE |
M3 |
|
8. Production of devices for customers/market |
|
|
5 days fixed duration. Requires 1 PE |
|
|
8.1 assembly and production preparation |
|
M3 |
2 person-weeks of PE |
|
|
8.2 Production of devices |
Bulk production of required number of devices for customers and market launch |
8.1 |
3 weeks fixed duration. Requires 1 PE. |
M5 |
Note: To achieve the WBS numbering shown in the table, you will have to manually enter the WBS numbers in a WBS column. Automatic generation will not produce the above WBS numbers because you should have an outer level summary task for the whole project (and also have milestones at the top of the task). It is very useful to include the correct WBS numbers as this will allow you to check your predecessor relationships by making a comparison with the table above.
Figure 1 - Activity in Box Network Diagrams for Production
Assume that all durations shown are fixed duration. Abbreviations: w is weeks and d is days.
Prototype 1
( P1 component lead-time 5.1 4 w Suppliers P1 PWB manuf acture and delivery 5.2 4 w Supplier P1 mechanical part lead-time 5.3 3 w Supplier P1 assembly and production test preparation 5.4 2 w 1 Production Engineer P1 prototype build 5. 5 2d P Engineer P1 M21 )
Prototype 2
( P2 component lead-time 6.1 4 w Suppliers P2 PWB manuf acture and delivery 6 .2 4 w Supplier P 2 mechanical part lead-time 6.4 3 w Supplier P 2 assembly and production test preparation 6 . 3 2 w 1 Production Engineer (fixed duration P 2 prototype build 6 . 5 2d P Engineer P2 1.5 3.6 1 Production Engineer (fixed duration )
As the project manager you have accepted the tasks of creating the compiled project schedule and allocating resources.
Available Resources
The maximum full time resources available for your project are:
|
Resource |
$/hour |
Number Available |
|
Electronics Engineer |
$95.00 |
3 |
|
Software Engineer |
$90.00 |
4 |
|
Mechanical Engineer |
$80.00 |
2 |
|
Test Engineer |
$90.00 |
1 |
|
Production Engineer |
$100.00 |
1 |
|
Technical Writer |
$65.00 |
1 |
Your team is committed to producing only two prototype iterations to develop and validate the design
You know that there are items you did not address at the project workshop and that you may need to make some assumptions to complete your schedule and budget. Make sure that you list any assumptions you make at the beginning of your assignment submission.
General Information
In addition to the work breakdown structure and AIB network diagram you have collected the following information.
· The project booking of the proto builds (task 5.5 and 6.5) will have to be done at the latest four (4) weeks in advance of the build. This is the lead time required to include builds in the manufacturing’s master production schedule.
· The company will have a general holiday period between 23/12/13 to 3/1/14. You should also include a public holiday on 7/10/13. You are not required to enter any other holidays for the purposes of this assignment.
· The booking of the Type Approval (TA) test house (task 4.7) has to be done 8 weeks prior to type approval (task 4.7).
· The engineers work a 40 hour week from Monday to Friday (i.e. a 5 day week with 8 hour days).
For part A of the assessment you must complete the following tasks and questions. Read all the questions before you commence the tasks.
1. Ms Horsell has asked you to use Microsoft Project to develop the project schedule. Note that Ms. Horsell has also asked you to include the milestones at the top of the task list in your schedule.
Develop the schedule and make sure that you
a) Include the milestones at the top of the task list (underneath the project summary task at the top of the task list).
b) Include the resource allocation details on the schedule.
c) Resolve any resource allocation issues. Assume that the project is constrained to the resources listed in the case study description above.
d) Have an appropriate project name as the top of the task list and have all other tasks indented below this heading. Note that by having the overall project summary task and the milestones at the top of the task list the automatically generated outline numbers / WBS numbers will not correspond to the WBS numbering in the specification. However, you should introduce a WBS column and manually enter the numbering required to keep the work breakdown numbering specified in the assignment. The WBS column should be placed before the task column.
e) Make sure that the holidays described in the “general information” are not included in the available working days for your project.
2. In this question you must identify the critical path in your schedule.
a) The bars of the tasks on the critical path must be automatically highlighted in the Gantt chart view of your project schedule (in the .mpp file). The marker should be able to view all tasks in the project when they open the .mpp file.
b) List the tasks on the critical path in your answer to this question in the Word document.
3. Include additional “milestones” (tasks with 0 duration) in your schedule to show the latest date you need to contact:
a) the production manager to ensure that the facilities are booked for the prototype builds (i.e. two milestones – one for each prototype build).
b) the type approval test house to ensure that the facilities are booked for the type approval.
c) According to your schedule when is the latest date that you need to contact:
· The production manager to book the facilities for the first prototype build?
· The production manager to book the facilities for the second prototype build?
· The type approval house to book the facilities for the type approval?
Note that these additional milestones should be listed at the end of the milestones list at the start of the project and should be highlighted in the task list in yellow using the “background colour” icon on the task ribbon. This is to allow your marker to locate them easily.
4. Write a memo to the director of product development, Ms. Horsell outlining:
a) the expected completion date of the project, assuming it commences at M1;
b) the total duration of the project;
c) an explanation of the main factors that cause the project to require that length of time
d) the estimated labour cost of the project after the M1 concept review. Present the costs in a table showing the costs for the following:
· Planning workshop
· Electronics
· Software
· Mechanics
· Verification
· Prototype 1 build
· Prototype 2 build
· Documentation
· Production of devices for customers
· Total for the Project
Assume that you will send the project schedule as an attachment to the memo.
5. Generate a “who does what report” using the Microsoft Project reporting facilities. The start of a “who does what report” for a different project is shown below. Include a screenshot of your “who does what” report as the answer to this question in your Word document.
6. Is there any way that the overall duration of the project can be shortened without removing any tasks? (Justify your answer. Be specific and describe any tasks that you would target and what you might do that could reduce the length of the project.)
7. Describe what the project manager needs to do to ensure that the project runs smoothly and completes on time. Give a detailed answer describing procedures, processes and anything else that you believe is important both in general terms and specifically for this project
8. Is there any way that the cost of this project could be reduced? (Justify your answer. Be specific and describe any implications (apart from the reduction in cost) that could result from you suggestion(s). You are only required to discuss one suggestion to answer this question.)
9. Are there any project related supporting activities, plans, events or tasks that you might have overlooked? If they were overlooked describe how this could impact on the project. .
Mr. Production reviews your project schedule and requests that both the prototype builds also include the participation of one engineer from electronics and one from mechanics. You will have to update your schedule as you agree with this proposal.
You are now 1 week after the M1 milestone and the display supplier has been revised the delivery time. This is one of the components required for the prototype 1 build (not the prototype 2 build). The delivery time is now expected to take 5 weeks. (This will impact on the duration for task 5.1.)
In addition, you are advised that the type approval and regulatory approval tests are now expected to take only 2 weeks.
Based on the additional information given above complete the following tasks:
1. Amend the project schedule incorporating the request from Mr. Production, the change to the delivery time for the display and the new estimated times for the regulatory approval task.
2. Describe the impact of each of the changes, i.e. what is the impact of:
a. the requirement for the additional resources on the prototype build on both the duration and the cost of the project?
b. the change in delivery time for the display component on both the duration and the cost of the project?
c. the change in the time for the regulatory approval tests on both the duration and the cost of the project.
3. Are there any options that you would consider instead of making any of these changes? Explain.
4. What is the new duration for the project? What is the new expected completion date for the project?
You have been advised that there will only be two software engineers available for the project.
1. Modify your resource details so that there are now only 2 software engineers available.
2. a) Does this result in a resource over-allocation issue in your schedule?
b) If so, resolve the resource over-allocation issue. If you had to resolve a resource over-allocation issue explain how you resolved the problem(s). If you did not have to resolve a resource over-allocation issue, explain how you would have resolved the resource over-allocation issue. a resource over-allocation issue using Microsoft Project.
3. Has this change impacted on the duration of your project? Explain why/why not.
4. Has this change impacted on the sensitivity of the network? Explain why/why not.
Assumptions
You are free to make any assumptions necessary to complete the assignment. However each assumption must be justified and stated clearly in your assessment word document. Marks will be deducted for any unreasonable assumption or for stating an assumption and then ignoring it in your assignment.
The assignment is to be submitted as four separate files using the electronic assignment submission system that can be accessed from the assessment item 2 link on the course website. The four files to be submitted are:
1. The Word document with the assumptions and solutions to the questions for Part A, Part B and Part C.
1. The Microsoft project files created for Part A, Part B and Part C. Please ensure that the names of these files clearly indicate their purpose, e.g. Xyzzy_Part_A.mpp, Xyzzy_Part_B.mpp and Xyzzy_Part_C.mpp.
Marking Guide for Assessment item 2 – Individual Case Study
|
Assignment Question |
Criteria |
Marks available |
Marks awarded |
|
Part A |
|
|
|
|
Q1 |
The adequacy of the Project Schedule · Tasks; correct WBS; overall summary task; auto scheduling · Durations/effort · Resources allocated (+ no over-allocation) · Milestones · Predecessor relationships · holidays |
7 |
|
|
Q2 |
Critical path highlighted and tasks listed |
1 |
|
|
Q3 |
Dates of bookings |
1 |
|
|
Q4 |
Appropriateness of the Written Memo and all information correct according to the schedule |
4 |
|
|
Q5 |
Who does what report |
1 |
|
|
Q6 |
Details on shortening the Project |
2 |
|
|
Q7 |
Ensuring finished on time |
3 |
|
|
Q8 |
Reducing cost. |
2 |
|
|
Q9 |
Overlooked “activities” |
3 |
|
|
Sub Total Part A |
|
24 |
|
|
Part B |
|
|
|
|
Q1 |
The adequacy of the amended Project Plan (+ ensure no resource over-allocation) |
2 |
|
|
Q2 |
Discussion of the impact of each of the changes (for each discuss impact on budget and duration) |
3 |
|
|
Q3 |
Discussion of options |
1 |
|
|
Q4 |
Overall duration change |
1 |
|
|
Sub Total Part B |
|
7 |
|
|
Part C |
|
|
|
|
Q1 |
Change to 2 SEs |
1 |
|
|
Q2 |
Resolution of resource issues |
1 |
|
|
Q3 |
Impact on duration + explanation |
1 |
|
|
Q4 |
Impact on network sensitivity + explanation |
1 |
|
|
Sub Total Part C |
|
4 |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
35 |
|
example PM/Assignment PM - word file solution - EXAMPLE.docx
· The resources and employees have not any absences along the duration of this project
· There is no extension and lateness of work during this project.
· All work are done perfectly, there are not any re-done or re-fixed the work that will increase the working duration of that activities
· The start date of this project is Monday, 19th August 2013
· Some information that course coordinator provided around week 10 and 11 are not applied. This has been done based on the first given information.
Part A
1. The critical paths in my schedule are listed below:
1.4 P1 electronics verification
1.5 P2 circuit design
2.8 Review of designs and test plans
3.1 Industrial design
3.2 PWB outline modifications
3.3 P1 mechanical CAD design
3.4 Tolerance stack analysis
3.5 P1 mechanical part analysis
3.6 P2 mechanical part
4.2 Component tests
4.5 Product validation tests
4.6 Technical Construction File compilations
4.7 Type approval and regulatory approval tests
5.1 P1 component lead-time
5.2 P1 PWB manufacture and delivery
5.5 P1 prototype build
6.1 P2 component lead-time
6.2 P2 PWB manufacture and delivery
6.4 P2 assembly and production test preparation
6.5 P2 prototype build
8.1 assembly and production preparation
8.2 Production of devices
2. According to your schedule when is the latest date that you need to contact:
· The production manager to book the facilities for the first prototype build?
Mon 14/10/13
· The production manager to book the facilities for the second prototype build?
Wed 27/11/13
· The type approval house to book the facilities for the type approval?
Fri 13/12/13
3. A memo to the director of product development, Ms. Horsell:
Assume that the project schedule would be send as an attachment to the memo.
Memo
To: Ms. Horsell, the director of product development
From: Ms. Andersen, the project manager
Date: 10th September 2013
Subject: The Xyzzy Company outline.
Xyzzy is a medium sized company that develops and manufactures mobile data collection devices. This project commences at M1, which is the concept review. The start date of this project is Monday, 19th August 2013. The expected completion date of this project is going to be on Thursday, 27th March 2014. Therefore, the total duration of this project is 148 days. The project requires this length of time because of many factors. Firstly, some activities have to be done respectively before starting the other new activities. Secondly, there are the limited resources and fixed duration, so the project consumes this duration as these constrains. This duration was estimated without risks and accident that might be occurred such as delaying of resource delivery. For the estimated labour costs, the estimation of cost for each activity is shown in following table
|
Activity |
Cost (AUD) |
|
Planning workshop |
8320.00 |
|
Electronics |
35720.00 |
|
Software |
127840.00 |
|
Mechanics |
35200.00 |
|
Verification |
28800.00 |
|
Prototype 1 build |
9600.00 |
|
Prototype 2 build |
9600.00 |
|
Documentation |
14000.00 |
|
Production of devices for customer |
20000.00 |
|
Total |
289080.00 |
4. Who does what report of Xyzzy project is shown in Figure 1 and 2.
Figure 1 Who does what report of Xyzzy project page 1
Figure 2 Who does what report of Xyzzy project page 2
5. Is there any way that the overall duration of the project can be shortened without removing any tasks? (Justify your answer. Be specific and describe any tasks that you would target and what you might do that could reduce the length of the project.)
Yes, there are some ways to shorten the overall duration of this project without removing any tasks. The activities that are critical path draw the estimated duration of the project. As a result, changing or reducing activities in critical path is obviously reduced overall duration of the project such as outsourcing the project works (resources not constrain) and fast tracking (resources constrained). For the outsourcing, the outsourcing partners, who are more specialized and familiar with the specific activities, therefore it is going to consume less time. For example, removing a critical path “3.3 P1 mechanical CAD design” to a CAD design company is going to reduce the duration of this task, as well as the overall duration. For the fast tracking, the orders of each activity could be changed. Some activity can be start earlier instead of the same sequences such as changing Finish-to-Start sequence to Start-to Start-sequence. For example, if the Xyzzy does outsource the industrial design, the outsourcer probably reduces usage time from 10 days to 5 days. As well as overall duration are decreased to 143 days. Another example, the type approval and regulatory approval tests (4.7) have to start after the technical construction file compilation (4.8). If both activities are changed the sequence to be Start-to-Start, this will mean that the type approval and regulatory approval tests have to start in the same date as the technical construction file compilation. As a result, the overall duration is reduced for 5 days.
6. Describe what the project manager needs to do to ensure that the project runs smoothly and completes on time. Give a detailed answer describing procedures, processes and anything else that you believe is important both in general terms and specifically for this project
As the project manager, evaluation and control are important in order to ensure that the project runs smoothly and complete on time. For the small project, the involvement and wandering around are enough to control the project. Anyway, it is needed the formal control in the larger project such as the project monitoring information system, the project progress report format and the project control process. Those methods help to determine what is going on the project. The project monitoring system is contained what data to collect, collecting the data, how to analyze the data and how to report current progress to management. For the project progress report format, it is shown last report progress, current status, trends, problems and also corrective action plan. For the last method, the project control process is involved “comparing actual performance against plan to identify deviations, evaluate courses of action, and take appropriate corrective action” (Larson, 2011). This method mainly uses the tracking and baseline Gantt chart, which uses in this project, and control charts as the tools. Those methods and tools are suitable to project manager to evaluate that project run ahead or behind the schedule. The manager then can control the direction of the project to be always in the scope or plan. For example, the project manager can see the actual work in tracking grant chart. If there is the lacking behind task or the over-estimated cost, the manager have to take closely control and resolve the problem immediately.
7. Is there any way that the cost of this project could be reduced? (Justify your answer. Be specific and describe any implications (apart from the reduction in cost) that could result from you suggestion(s). You are only required to discuss one suggestion to answer this question.)
Yes, there are some ways that the cost of this project could be reduced. In project management, Larson and Gray (2011) stated that there are three typical kinds of costs, which are direct cost, direct project overhead costs and general and administrative overhead cost. The direct costs are clearly chargeable to a specific work package (Larson, 2011) such as cost of materials and equipments. Secondly, direct project overhead costs are tied to project deliverable or work (Larson, 2011) packages such as rents, supplies and specialized machinery. The last cost is the general and administrative overhead cost, which is not directly linked to a specific project such as advertising and accounting. Obviously, the reduction in general and administrative overhead cost is the easiest way to decrease overall cost of this project because it is not related to project progresses and used resources as the indirect cost directly. The indirect cost is directly depended on increasing time, so reducing project time directly reduces indirect costs (Larson, 2011). Furthermore, outsourcing of some activity can be reduced the cost as well as saving the time. The salary, supplies and specialized machinery costs are removed to outsourcer, which are more familiar and specialized with specific activities. For example, if the Xyzzy does outsource the industrial design, the outsourcer probably reduces usage time from 10 days to 5 days as the previous answer about shorten the duration. The Xyzzy is going to save the cost of $6400 and then is going to pay for outsourcing, which is probably less than $6400, instead.
8. Are there any project related supporting activities, plans, events or tasks that you might have overlooked? If they were overlooked describe how this could impact on the project.
Yes, there are project related supporting activities, plans, events or tasks that you might have overlooked. All kinds of activities have the opportunities to confront with risks, which is defined as the uncertain or chance events that planning cannot overcome or control (Larson, 2011). This would be resulted in over-budget, over-expected duration, or breaking down the project. Therefore, the risk management directly is a tool to recognize and manage internal events and external threats to be a successful project. It is obviously going to improves project performances within budget and on time. Furthermore, conserving of quality as the quality management on each task and whole project are one of the key to decrease the risk or to meet the expected requirements.
Part B
1. Amend the project schedule incorporating the request from Mr. Production, the change to the delivery time for the display and the new estimated times for the regulatory approval task.
The overall duration is reduced to be 145 days and the total cost is increase to be $294,680.00
2. The impact of each of the changes:
a. The requirement for the additional resources on the prototype builds on both the duration and the cost of the project?
Both the prototype builds are required to include the participation of one engineer from electronics and one from mechanics instead of one production engineer. The cost in each prototype build is initially equal to $1600.00. After changing the resources to be an electronic engineer and a mechanics engineer, the cost of each prototype is increased to $4,400.00. This is resulted by the increase number of participating resources. Moreover, the standard rate that has to pay to a production engineer, $100.00/hr, is less than the standard rate that has to pay to an electronic engineer and a mechanics engineer together. The standard rate is reached $185.00/hr. The duration following this change is the same.
b. The change in delivery time for the display component on both the duration and the cost of the project?
At activity P1, component lead-time, the duration is requested to increase from 4 weeks to 5 weeks. As a result, the overall duration is increase for a week or 5 days following this change because this activity is critical. For this activity, there is not any required internal resource. It means that this change does not affect the cost of this project, thus the overall cost of this project following this change is the same.
c. The change in the time for the regulatory approval tests on both the duration and the cost of the project.
The type approval and regulatory approval tests are decreased the duration from 20 days to 10 days. As a result, the overall duration is decreased for two weeks or 10 days following this change because this activity is critical. Moreover, the cost is not changed as previous discussion of the change in delivery time for the display component. It is because this activity is not related to internal resources.
3. The options that would consider instead of making any of these changes:
The changes of duration that have made in this part are in the critical path, therefore it affects the overall duration of this project. In order to avoid the effect on the duration of the whole projects, the project must not adapt on critical path. On the other hand, it means that the overall duration can be reduced by decreasing duration on critical paths. Anyway, there is constrain that affects the duration and costs of project. It is the limitation of resource. In some task, the duration can be shortened by increase the number of worker, but amount of workers within organization possibly is limited. For example, Xyzzy has only one production engineer, one test engineer and one technical writer. Outsourcing, fast-tracking (changing schedule or orders of tasks, reducing project scope, compromise quality are alternative ways to save time and budget of the project.
4. What is the new duration for the project? What is the new expected completion date for the project?
The new duration is 145 days and the new expected completion date of the project is Monday, 24th March 2014.
Part C
2. a. Does this result in a resource over-allocation issue in your schedule?
Yes, this result in a resource over-allocation issue in the schedule
b. If so, resolve the resource over-allocation issue. If you had to resolve a resource over-allocation issue explain how you resolved the problem(s). If you did not have to resolve a resource over-allocation issue, explain how you would have resolved the resource over-allocation issue. a resource over-allocation issue using Microsoft Project.
A resource over-allocation issue occurs in the resource-constrain project. The resources in the project are limited in quantity and availability. Larson and Gray (2011) stated the trick is “to prioritize and allocate resources to minimize project delay without exceeding the resource limit or altering the technical network relationships”. This plays the role mainly on the minimizing slack and managing the respects or orders of each activity.
Using Microsoft Project, a resource over-allocation can be automatically resolved by selecting “Resource” and then selecting “Level all”. This function resolve resource conflicts or over-allocations the entire project by delaying or splitting tasks. This tool changes the some orders or schedules as shown in the Figure 3 and 4. It shows that the orders of some activities are managed.
Figure 1 The grant chart of Activity 2, which is contained the resources mainly from software engineer in Part B
Figure 2 The grant chart of Activity 2, which is contained the resources mainly from software engineer in Part C (The over-allocation have been resolved by levelling)
3. Has this change impacted on the duration of your project? Explain why/why not.
No, this change has not impacted on the duration of project. The resolving has been done in slack of activity such as adjusting order based on the range of slack. Therefore, the adjusting has not been done in critical path, which is no slack or slack is zero.
4. Has this change impacted on the sensitivity of the network? Explain why/why not.
Yes, this change impacted on the sensitivity of the network. “A sensitive network would be one or more than critical paths and/or noncritical activities with very little slack” (Larson, 2011). It means that the schedule in not adjustable or levelling easily. If there is any change on critical path or change that do not respect to the slack, the whole project will be affected. In Xyzzy, there are many critical paths within Activity 2; therefore, it is hard to avoid the adjusting on critical path.
Reference
Larson, EW & Gray, CF 2011, Project management: the managerial process, 5th edition, McGraw-Hill
\