"For professor Ryan"
Case 1
TeleSouth
Location: Birmingham
Employees: Approximately 400
Industry: Cellular and land-based telecommunications
Background
TeleSouth was established in Birmingham in March 2002 and began commercial operations in
mid-2003. TeleSouth operates a cellular telephone network based on digital technology in
competition with Telecom Cellular and Telecom land-based systems. The parent company is
TeleSouth Corporation of Atlanta. The company has grown rapidly since start-up and by mid-
2006 employed 383 people, mostly at its prominently located Birmingham headquarters. Further
growth was planned to around 400 employees.
Like many start-up and Greenfield site companies, TeleSouth placed a great deal of emphasis on
its recruitment and selection process. Staff were recruited to a number of different functions -
sales, marketing, information technology, finance, engineering, customer services, human
resources, and legal. Recruitment was rapid; 227 people were recruited during 2005. Sixty per
cent of those recruited were aged under 30 and for many of them TeleSouth was their first
employer. The average length of service of the whole work force is less than two years. Fifty-
five per cent of employees are female and the proportion of female mangers is 43 per cent.
Approach to HRM
The following is a summary of the company's approach in the HRM areas shown.
Recruitment/Selection Induction/Orientation Socialization
Company's public
image
Job advertisement
Word of mouth
Telephone
interview
Observations in
reception
1st and 2nd
interview
Psychological
assessment
Medical
Verbal references
Verbal offer
Formal orientation
course
First days on job --
Mechanics/
housekeeping, desk,
phone, introduction to
department
Integration into
work group
Assimilation into
culture of
department/organization
Development of
task skills
Understanding of
role/ responsibilities and
fit with organization
goals
Career anchor
Organizational
loyalty
The Selection Process
TeleSouth had no difficulty in attracting a large number of applicants for the vacancies. It had a
progressive dynamic image and was in a leading new product market area. As the company was
growing rapidly, management structures were loose. TeleSouth therefore sought employees who
did not require detailed day-to-day supervision, but who would be able to work in an uncertain,
ambiguous fluid environment. In the selection process the employee characteristics being sought
included intelligence, flexibility and energy.
Survey work done by the company revealed that employees had a high regard for the selection
process. Through it they were made to feel special individuals on whom a lot of time and effort
was being expended. Coming through the extensive rigorous process successfully, confirmed
them as special people coming to work for a special company. The formal two-day orientation
course also treated new employees as special people. However, in the socialization phase
employees reported that they received much less individual attention and support and had the
sense of being thrown in at the deep end. They felt that their managers were so busy doing their
jobs that they could not deal with the individual concerns of the new employees.
Results
TeleSouth found that despite their carefully structured recruitment and selection process, their
well organized and presented orientation course, and their attempts at socialization, they suffered
what they considered a rather high turnover rate. Moreover, analysis of turnover revealed that it
was rising and that it particularly applied to people who had only been in the company a short
time. Nearly a quarter of the turnover was in the first six months and 50 per cent in the first
year. People who stayed beyond those early months tended to fulfill two years' service before
there was another peak of turnover. Analysis of reasons for leaving revealed that the main
reasons were for career advancement, to travel and work elsewhere, for a complete career
change, and because of dissatisfaction with the job role. Career advancement was not for higher
pay for the same job, but to move on to a similar job at a higher level. TeleSouth employees
were highly regarded in the labor market. Mobility and travel was seen as an almost inevitable
part of the lifestyle of younger employees seeking to experience a bit more of the country. The
reasons for career change were varied, but such changes could suggest a lack of good fit in the
first place. Dissatisfaction with their role meant that the actual job did not turn out as the
employees expected. More conventional reasons for leaving, such as dissatisfaction with pay,
family, or dismissal, were not significant in this case.
The Human Resource Manager was rather concerned with these findings. It was estimated that,
at a minimum, the combined direct and indirect cost of this turnover was $20,000 per person.