THIS assignment i really need 100% free plagiarized and APA sytle and that follow the rubic step by step

profilealvrez1
auo_cja345_lasa2_grading_rubric.doc

image1.jpg

NOTE: If a component is absent, student receives a zero for that component.

CJA345 LASA 2 Rubric

Components

Unsatisfactory

Emerging

Proficient

Exemplary

Assignment Components

Summarize the research findings from the selected research study.

CO 4

Incomplete summary; did not match the research findings of the research study.

Provided a summary of most of the research findings, but the summary was vague or did not match some of the findings from the selected research study.

Provided a complete summary of the research findings but did not show initiative to present supporting details that could be found in the selected research study.

Demonstrated and analysis of the research findings; provided a clear and concise evaluation of all of the findings in the selected research study.

Interpret the results of the selected research study.

CO 2

Underdeveloped with inaccurate or incomplete comparison of the two designs; incomplete list of relative strengths of each design.

Provided a vague explanation of the two designs, with limited examples of the relative strengths of each design.

Provided an analysis of the two designs, comparing most the relative strengths of each design.

Provided a clear and concise analysis of the two designs, evaluating, and in some cases debating, the relative strengths of each design.

Identify the key facts and issues of the selected research study.

CO 4

Incomplete or few key facts and issues presented in the selected research study. Identified many minor details as key facts.

Identified some of the key facts and issues presented in the selected research study. Identified some minor details as key facts.

Identified the majority of the key facts and issues presented in the selected research study. Did not identify minor details as key facts.

Provided clear and concise descriptions of all the key facts and issues presented in the selected research study demonstrating original thinking. Did not identify minor details as key facts.

Analyze the key facts and issues of the selected research study.

CO 2

Incomplete analysis; did not demonstrate an understanding of the key facts and issues contained in the study.

Analysis partially addressed some key facts and issues that were researched in the study but was vague and lacking in detail.

Analysis demonstrated and understanding and accounted for most key facts and issues that were researched in the study.

Provided a rational analysis of the key facts and issues that were researched in the study. Analysis demonstrated a thorough understanding of the key facts and issues contained in the study.

Propose an appropriate set of recommendations for the selected stakeholder or constituent.

CO 2

Recommendations for the selected stakeholder were missing or unclear. Recommendations did not demonstrate an understanding of stakeholder needs.

Provided recommendations for the selected stakeholder. However, the recommendations did not demonstrate a complete understanding of stakeholder needs or did not relate those needs to the recommendation.

Provided a clear set of recommendations for the selected stakeholder. Recommendations demonstrated a thorough understanding of stakeholder needs and related those needs to the recommendation.

Provided a concise set of recommendations for the selected stakeholder. Recommendations demonstrated an analysis of stakeholder needs and synthesized those needs into the recommendation.

Support recommendations with appropriate sources and effective arguments.

CO 2

Arguments for recommendations were unclear and selected source material was not appropriate to support arguments. Arguments were not clearly based on selected source material.

Argued for recommendations, but selected source material was not entirely appropriate to support arguments. Arguments were not clearly based on selected source material.

Made solid arguments for recommendations. Selected source material was appropriate to support most arguments. Arguments were based on selected source material.

Made rational, sound arguments for recommendations. Selected appropriate source material to support arguments. Arguments flow clearly and logically from selected source material.

Create an effective script for visual presentation of the data cited.

CO 2

Script barely addressed the visual data contained in the PowerPoint presentation. Script summarized or restated the on-screen text from the presentation.

Created a script that addressed most of the visual data contained in the PowerPoint presentation. Script provided some context for the visual data, but also did a significant amount of summarizing or restating the on-screen text from the presentation.

Created a script that addressed all of the visual data contained in the PowerPoint presentation. Script provided context for the visual data, with only some summarizing or restating the on-screen text from the presentation.

Created an engaging script that addressed all of the visual data contained in the PowerPoint presentation. Script provided complete context for the visual data without summarizing or restating the on-screen text from the presentation.

Writing Components

Organization

Introduction

Thesis

Transitions

Conclusion

Introduction is limited or missing entirely.

The paper lacks a thesis statement.

Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely.

Conclusion is limited or missing entirely.

Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.

The paper is loosely organized around a thesis that may have to be inferred.

Transitions are sporadic.

Conclusion is present, but incomplete or underdeveloped.

Introduction has a clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic.

The paper is organized around an arguable, clearly stated thesis statement.

Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas.

Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.

Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background info, and clearly states the topic.

The paper is well organized around an arguable, focused thesis.

Thoughtful transitions clearly show how ideas relate.

Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights.

Usage and Mechanics

Grammar

Spelling

Sentence structure

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension.

Errors in spelling and grammar exist that somewhat interfere with readability and/or comprehension.

Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension.

The paper is basically error free in terms of mechanics. Grammar and mechanics help establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic.

APA Elements

Attribution

Paraphrasing

Quotations

No attempt at APA format.

APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant.

Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited in many spots throughout when appropriate or called for. Errors present are somewhat minor.

Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited throughout the presentation when appropriate or called for. Only a few minor errors present.

Style

Audience

Word Choice

Writing often slips into first and/or second person.

Word choice is consistently inaccurate, unclear, or inappropriate for the audience.

Writing sometimes slips into first and/or second person.

Word choice is sometimes inaccurate, unclear, or inappropriate for the audience.

Writing remains in third person throughout writing.

Word choice is accurate, clear and appropriate for the audience.

Writing remains professional in third person throughout writing.

Word choice is precise, appropriate for the audience, and memorable.

AU-CJA345 LASA 2 Grading Rubric 1

image1.jpg