I WOULD LIKE TO SOMEONE WHO REALLY GOING TO DO WHAT THE ASSIGNMENT SAY APA STYLE 100%PLAGIARISM THANK YOU
NOTE: If a component is absent, student receives a zero for that component.
CJA345 LASA 1 Rubric
|
Components |
Unsatisfactory
|
Emerging
|
Proficient
|
Exemplary
|
|
Assignment Components |
||||
|
Identify and describe the available research approaches and data sources. CO 1 |
Inaccurate information provided, missing the main components to identify and describe available research approaches and data sources |
Vague description of available research approaches and data sources provided
|
Demonstrated comprehension of available research approaches and data sources with some detail provided
|
Provided clear analysis and concise descriptions with synthesized details that support evaluation of available research approaches and data sources appropriated to the topic |
|
Recommend research approaches and data sources that were appropriate to the Chief’s information needs. CO 1 |
Provided an incomplete recommendation that was incorrect for the Chief’s information needs |
Provided a vague recommendation that was partially appropriate to the Chief’s information needs |
Provided a recommendation that demonstrated understanding of the Chief’s information needs with some details provided |
Provided a recommendation that was analyzed with an evaluation that was clearly intended to recommend solutions for the Chief’s information needs |
|
Provide an effective rationale for the recommended research approaches and data sources. CO 1 |
Failed to complete task/incomplete; providing little rationale for the recommended research approaches and data sources. |
Provided some rationale for the recommended research approaches and data sources with vague descriptions. |
Provided a rationale for the recommended research approaches and data sources that demonstrates comprehension with some detail provided. |
Provided a clear, concise rationale for the recommended research approaches and data sources with synthesized details that support evaluation of the topic. |
|
Select two research designs for the task. CO 1 |
Inaccurate information provided; demonstrated an incomplete understanding of appropriate research designs for the task. |
Select two partially appropriate research designs for the task. |
Demonstrated an understanding of options available and good decision making when selecting two appropriate research designs for the task. |
Demonstrated analysis of options available and constructive judgment when selecting two appropriate research designs for the task.
|
|
Compare the two research designs for the task. CO 1 |
Demonstrated an incomplete understanding of the two research designs attempted but was not successful in listing similarities and differences of each design. |
Attempted to compare the similarities and differences of the two research designs but some information was missing. |
Provided a comparison of the two designs; similarities and differences were clearly pointed out.
|
Provided through evaluation of the two research designs with clear and concise comparison of the two designs, highlighting all of the relative strengths of each design. |
|
Identify the cultural, ethical, or other considerations that may impact research efforts. CO 3 |
Inaccurate information provided; missing the main components to identify possible cultural and ethical considerations that may impact research efforts. |
Underdeveloped description of possible cultural and ethical considerations that may impact research efforts. |
Summary identified possible cultural and ethical impacts to research and makes an attempt to examine other considerations that may impact research efforts. |
Provided clear and concise descriptions of cultural and ethical considerations that may impact research while demonstrating original thinking in explaining the application of other considerations that may impact research.
|
|
Evaluate the cultural, ethical, or other considerations that may impact research efforts. CO 3 |
Inaccurate information provided; did not clearly evaluate the ways in which the cultural or ethical issues might impact the research efforts. |
Demonstrated a vague understanding, but did attempt to evaluate some of the ways in which cultural or ethical issues might impact the research efforts. |
Provided a correct evaluation of the ways in which most of the identified cultural or ethical issues might impact the research efforts. |
Provided a clear, concise, and insightful evaluation of the ways in which each cultural or ethical issue might impact research efforts as well as offered suggestions to improve research efforts for integrity and verification. |
|
Writing Components |
||||
|
Organization Introduction Thesis Transitions Conclusion |
Introduction is limited or missing entirely. The paper lacks a thesis statement. Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely. Conclusion is limited or missing entirely.
|
Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped. The paper is loosely organized around a thesis that may have to be inferred. Transitions are sporadic. Conclusion is present, but incomplete or underdeveloped.
|
Introduction has a clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic. The paper is organized around an arguable, clearly stated thesis statement. Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas. Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.
|
Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background info, and clearly states the topic. The paper is well organized around an arguable, focused thesis. Thoughtful transitions clearly show how ideas relate. Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights. |
|
Usage and Mechanics Grammar Spelling Sentence structure
|
Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension.
|
Errors in spelling and grammar exist that somewhat interfere with readability and/or comprehension.
|
Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension. |
The paper is basically error free in terms of mechanics. Grammar and mechanics help establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic.
|
|
APA Elements Attribution Paraphrasing Quotations |
No attempt at APA format. |
APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant. |
Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited in many spots throughout when appropriate or called for. Errors present are somewhat minor.
|
Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited throughout the presentation when appropriate or called for. Only a few minor errors present. |
|
Style Audience Word Choice |
Writing often slips into first and/or second person. Word choice is consistently inaccurate, unclear, or inappropriate for the audience. |
Writing sometimes slips into first and/or second person. Word choice is sometimes inaccurate, unclear, or inappropriate for the audience. |
Writing remains in third person throughout. Word choice is accurate, clear, and appropriate for the audience. |
Writing remains professional in third person throughout. Word choice is precise, appropriate for the audience, and memorable.
|
AU-CJA345 LASA 1 Grading Rubric 1