Research Paper using ForecastX and forecasting techniques
BUSI 405
Research Paper Grading Rubric
|
|
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
|
Knowledge (70 points) |
Demonstrates a broad base of general knowledge |
Demonstrates adequate general knowledge |
Demonstrates inadequate general knowledge |
|
Communication (50 points) |
Demonstrates exemplary skills in writing |
Demonstrates sufficient skills in writing for effective classroom communication |
Demonstrates insufficient skills in writing for effective classroom communication |
|
Structure (30 points) |
TOPIC & DEVELOPMENT: Articulates a main point or topic; supports or amplifies thesis/topic sentence throughout; draws appropriate conclusions from evidence ORGANIZATION: Clear structure with appropriate transitions where needed PARAGRAPHS: Focused and well organized |
TOPIC & DEVELOPMENT: Generally articulates a main point or topic early on; mostly supports or amplifies thesis/topic sentence throughout; draws basically appropriate conclusions from evidence ORGANIZATION: Generally clear structure with appropriate transitions where needed PARAGRAPHS: Generally focused and well organized |
TOPIC & DEVELOPMENT: Contains a point, evidence, and conclusion, but does not necessarily put them in the proper order or make them clearly visible ORGANIZATION: Salvageable structure with some attempt at transition PARAGRAPHS: Mostly on topic though with some shifts and errors in focus |
|
Content (25 points) |
FOCUS: Clear and coherent LOGIC: Clear and obvious flow of ideas EVIDENCE: Assertions fully and appropriately supported CONCEPT: Appropriate choice of topic, examples, and style PURPOSE: Meets assignment guidelines and addresses appropriate material |
FOCUS: Obvious focus, generally maintained LOGIC: Generally logical flow of thought EVIDENCE: Supports most assertions well CONCEPT: Generally appropriate choice of topic, examples, and style PURPOSE: Basically meets assignment guidelines and addresses appropriate material |
FOCUS: Weakly focused LOGIC: Some leaps in logic or fallacious reasoning EVIDENCE: Some assertions unsupported, or failure to distinguish between assertions and proof CONCEPT: Weak choice of topic, examples, and style PURPOSE: Does not meet assignment guidelines (but does not entirely fail to accomplish the objective) |
|
Readability (25 points) |
MECHANICS: Contains only very minor grammar and punctuation errors or typos; errors must not seriously distract or harm clarity DICTION: Appropriate word usage for topic and assignment CLARITY: Easily understandable; clearly expressed
|
MECHANICS: Contains some grammar and punctuation errors or typos; errors may distract but must not seriously harm clarity DICTION: Generally appropriate word usage for topic and assignment CLARITY: Generally understandable and clearly expressed
|
MECHANICS: Contains significant and distracting grammar and punctuation errors or typos; errors may harm clarity (but not render the paper incomprehensible) DICTION: Some errors in word usage for topic and assignment CLARITY: Reader may have to work to understand; thought may seem muddled
|
Total Points: /200