solutions pro 6

OTL520

Critical Thinking Rubric - Module 6

Criteria Meets Expectation Approaches Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence

Content, Research, and Analysis

37-45 Points 28-36 Points 19-27 Points 10-18 Points

Requirements All required

components of the

assignment were

present and included

adequate detail,

including:

• Three to five learning objectives

• Indication of how each objective will

be measured

• Identification of critical content

needed for learners

to meet each

objective

• Organized and sequenced content

The assignment was

missing one component

or one or more of the

following components did

not include enough

detail:

• Three to five learning objectives

• Indication of how each objective will be

measured

• Identification of critical content

needed for learners

to meet each

objective

• Organized and sequenced content

The assignment was

missing two components

or two or more of the

following components did

not include enough

detail:

• Three to five learning objectives

• Indication of how each objective will be

measured

• Identification of critical content

needed for learners

to meet each

objective

• Organized and sequenced content

The assignment was

missing three or more

components or three or

more of the following

components did not

include enough detail:

• Three to five learning objectives

• Indication of how each objective will be

measured

• Identification of critical content

needed for learners

to meet each

objective

• Organized and sequenced content

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points

Content Demonstrates strong or

adequate knowledge of

learning objectives;

correctly represents

knowledge from the

readings and sources.

Some significant but not

major errors or omissions

in demonstration of

knowledge.

Major errors or omissions

in demonstration of

knowledge.

Failed to demonstrate

knowledge of the

materials.

Mechanics and Writing

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points

Demonstrates

college-level

proficiency in

organization,

grammar and

style.

Project is clearly

organized, well written,

and in proper format as

outlined in the

assignment. Strong

sentence and paragraph

structure; few errors in

grammar and spelling.

Project is fairly well

organized and written,

and is in proper format as

outlined in the

assignment. Reasonably

good sentence and

paragraph structure;

significant number of

errors in grammar and

spelling.

Project is poorly

organized; does not

follow proper paper

format. Inconsistent to

inadequate sentence and

paragraph development;

numerous errors in

grammar and spelling.

Project is not organized

or well written, and is not

in proper paper format.

Poor quality work;

unacceptable in terms of

grammar and spelling.

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points

Demonstrates

proper use of

APA style

Project contains proper

APA formatting,

according to the CSU-

Global Guide to Writing

and APA Requirements,

with no more than one

significant error.

Few errors in APA

formatting, according to

the CSU-Global Guide to

Writing and APA

Requirements, with no

more than two to three

significant errors.

Significant errors in APA

formatting, according to

the CSU-Global Guide to

Writing and APA

Requirements, with four

to five significant errors.

Numerous errors in APA

formatting, according to

the CSU-Global Guide to

Writing and APA

Requirements, with more

than five significant

errors.

Total points possible = 75